Abstract:BitMEX fined $100M for anti-money laundering and KYC violations. The case highlights the U.S. crackdown on crypto platforms ignoring Bank Secrecy Act rules.

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX has been hit with a $100 million fine by U.S. authorities for failing to comply with anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules. The ruling, issued by a Manhattan federal court, also sentenced the exchange to two years of probation after it pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
While the fine is significant, its a far cry from the $417 million prosecutors originally pursued. The case spotlighted how BitMEX operated with a disregard for U.S. laws designed to prevent financial crimes, including money laundering.
Prosecutors uncovered that BitMEX knowingly allowed U.S.-based customers to use its platform, despite regulations prohibiting this. Even after claiming to withdraw from the U.S. market in 2015, the Seychelles-based company implemented only weak measures to block American users. At the same time, its executives continued to promote the exchange at U.S. events.
Adding to the violations, BitMEX allegedly used a Hong Kong-based business as a pass-through for U.S. dollar transactions. Prosecutors said the company misled a Hong Kong bank about the nature of these activities.
“Todays sentence sends a clear message that companies that willfully violate these rules and refuse to implement AML/KYC programs will face consequences,” U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky said.

BitMEX addressed the ruling in a blog post, calling the charges “old news” and expressing disappointment about the penalty. However, the exchange acknowledged that the fine was far lower than the Justice Departments original demands.
The company also emphasized that it has been working to improve its AML and KYC protocols, even before the charges were brought against it. This effort is part of BitMEXs strategy to rebuild trust and ensure compliance with global regulations.
This isnt the first time BitMEX has faced consequences for its regulatory missteps. In 2021, the company agreed to pay $100 million to settle with U.S. regulators. In 2022, its three founders pleaded guilty to related criminal charges, each agreeing to pay $10 million in fines.
The BitMEX case highlights the growing pressure on cryptocurrency platforms to comply with financial regulations. With digital assets becoming more mainstream, governments worldwide are stepping up their efforts to ensure that exchanges have proper systems in place to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes.
The $100 million penalty is a wake-up call for the cryptocurrency industry. Its a clear reminder that compliance with AML and KYC regulations is not optional. For companies like BitMEX, failing to meet these standards risks not only hefty fines but also reputational damage. Moving forward, cryptocurrency exchanges must recognize that building trust with regulators and users alike is essential for long-term success in this evolving market.


Among the many DeltaFX complaints reviewed, the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) account lock during live trading was arguably the most prominent one. Secondly, a Turkish trader complained about the sudden closure of trades within five to six minutes. This raises suspicion over the trading manipulation at the broker. Looking further, we came across a complaint about the blockage of the trading account immediately after a deposit. In this DeltaFX review, we have examined several user allegations in 2026.

amari Capital, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage firm, may have limited user feedback. However, users only highlight the cons that warrant immediate attention from the broker officials to prevent a further dip in its trust score, which already sits at a low of 1.80 out of 10, according to the WikiFX data. Users have openly claimed foul play while trading on the platform. This amari Capital review aims to uncover those allegations against the broker.

Whether it’s South Asia, Western Asia, Europe or America, users all over are basically asking this: Why is VITTAVERSE cancelling my profits without providing any evidence? While they may be user allegations, a large volume of such complaints creates suspicion, if not affirmation, about the broker’s alleged involvement in profit cancellations. Users also complained about massive withdrawal delays in the name of ‘Account Review’ or ‘Account Upgrade’. This VITTAVERSE review article closely examines user allegations, including those concerning profit deletions, by the Seychelles-based brokerage firm. To give you a fair idea of its legitimacy, we have also provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

This is allegedly the case for most traders at WHITEFOREX, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage entity, as we look at real user reviews on broker investigation platforms such as WikiFX. Regardless of the profit seizure amount, whether it's $100 or $5,000, traders have expressed their utter frustration over this suspicious trading activity by the broker. Other complaints, such as poor customer support service, further add to traders’ woes. In this WHITEFOREX review 2026, we have investigated reported cases against the brokerage firm.
EBC FINANCIAL GROUP
TMGM
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
D prime
EBC FINANCIAL GROUP
TMGM
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
D prime
EBC FINANCIAL GROUP
TMGM
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
D prime
EBC FINANCIAL GROUP
TMGM
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
FOREX.com
D prime