Abstract:BitMEX fined $100M for anti-money laundering and KYC violations. The case highlights the U.S. crackdown on crypto platforms ignoring Bank Secrecy Act rules.

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX has been hit with a $100 million fine by U.S. authorities for failing to comply with anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules. The ruling, issued by a Manhattan federal court, also sentenced the exchange to two years of probation after it pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
While the fine is significant, its a far cry from the $417 million prosecutors originally pursued. The case spotlighted how BitMEX operated with a disregard for U.S. laws designed to prevent financial crimes, including money laundering.
Prosecutors uncovered that BitMEX knowingly allowed U.S.-based customers to use its platform, despite regulations prohibiting this. Even after claiming to withdraw from the U.S. market in 2015, the Seychelles-based company implemented only weak measures to block American users. At the same time, its executives continued to promote the exchange at U.S. events.
Adding to the violations, BitMEX allegedly used a Hong Kong-based business as a pass-through for U.S. dollar transactions. Prosecutors said the company misled a Hong Kong bank about the nature of these activities.
“Todays sentence sends a clear message that companies that willfully violate these rules and refuse to implement AML/KYC programs will face consequences,” U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky said.

BitMEX addressed the ruling in a blog post, calling the charges “old news” and expressing disappointment about the penalty. However, the exchange acknowledged that the fine was far lower than the Justice Departments original demands.
The company also emphasized that it has been working to improve its AML and KYC protocols, even before the charges were brought against it. This effort is part of BitMEXs strategy to rebuild trust and ensure compliance with global regulations.
This isnt the first time BitMEX has faced consequences for its regulatory missteps. In 2021, the company agreed to pay $100 million to settle with U.S. regulators. In 2022, its three founders pleaded guilty to related criminal charges, each agreeing to pay $10 million in fines.
The BitMEX case highlights the growing pressure on cryptocurrency platforms to comply with financial regulations. With digital assets becoming more mainstream, governments worldwide are stepping up their efforts to ensure that exchanges have proper systems in place to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes.
The $100 million penalty is a wake-up call for the cryptocurrency industry. Its a clear reminder that compliance with AML and KYC regulations is not optional. For companies like BitMEX, failing to meet these standards risks not only hefty fines but also reputational damage. Moving forward, cryptocurrency exchanges must recognize that building trust with regulators and users alike is essential for long-term success in this evolving market.


While Capex presents itself as a multi-regulated entity with a respectable B-ranking, a deeper look into recent user activities reveals a troubling dichotomy between its public image and client reality. Our investigation uncovers a systematic pattern of withdrawal blockers, aggressive account management tactics, and regulatory inconsistencies—particularly concerning for traders in the African and Latin American markets. Before you deposit, read this full breakdown of the primary risks associated with Capex.

Is your MBFX withdrawal request pending even after months of raising it? Has the broker defrauded you? Does the broker keep changing spreads to pile losses for you? Have you lost due to its copy trading activities? Is the customer support service silent to your trading queries? Many traders have called out the broker for these alleged wrongdoings. In this MBFX review article, we have highlighted these trading concerns. Read on!

In the complex world of online trading, a broker's regulatory status is the only safety net standing between a trader and financial ruin. Our investigation into GFS reveals a disturbing disconnect between its marketing claims and its operational reality. With a WikiFX Score of only 1.55/10, GFS lacks valid regulation and has been flagged for severe issues ranging from exorbitant hidden fees to the sudden deletion of client accounts. This report exposes the mechanisms used to trap investor funds.

Does every trade on the LonghornFX platform drain your profits with high slippage? Does the slippage occur even when markets remain normal? Do you constantly witness Bitcoin (BTC) withdrawal issues with this platform? Traders have highlighted how these inefficiencies affect their overall trading experience with the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based broker. In this LonghornFX review article, we have highlighted issues raised by traders. Take a look!