Abstract:London & Oxford Capital Markets was founded in 2000 and registered in the United Kingdom. The firm is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
| London & Oxford Review Summary | |
| Founded | 2000 |
| Registered Country/Region | United Kingdom |
| Regulation | FCA |
| Market Instruments | / |
| Demo Account | ❌ |
| Leverage | / |
| Spread | / |
| Trading Platform | / |
| Minimum Deposit | / |
| Customer Support | Contact form |
| Phone: +44 (0) 20 3746 5800 | |
| Email: info@londonandoxford.com | |
| Address: 4 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6DA | |
London & Oxford Capital Markets Limited was founded in 2000 and is registered in the United Kingdom. The firm is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). However, it is currently not undertaking any Part 4A regulated activity, onboarding new clients, or marketing any investment activities.

| Pros | Cons |
| Regulated by FCA | Unavailable website parts |
| Lack of transparency | |
| No demo accounts |
Yes, London & Oxford is currently regulated by FCA, holding a Market Maker (MM) License.
| Regulated Country | Regulated Authority | Regulated Entity | Current Status | License Type | License Number |
![]() | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | London and Oxford Capital Markets Limited | Regulated | Market Maker (MM) | 163299 |

London & Oxford is currently not undertaking any Part 4A regulated activity, onboarding any new clients or marketing, or communicating any invitation to engage in investment activities.
Further information about the requirements that apply to Part 4A permission can be found at the FCA Register (https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/financial-services-register). You can contact them to discuss further.
Most parts of their website are currently unavailable.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.