Abstract:Liquidnet brought in £159 million since its acquisition. The group is now focused on revenue diversification.

TP ICAP, the world‘s biggest inter-deal broker, published its annual financials for 2021, reporting more than 81 percent drop in its profits for the 12 months. It generated £24 million as pre-tax profits last year compared to 2020’s £129 million.
Additionally, the basic earnings per share of the company plunged to 0.7 pence from 15.4 pence in the prior year.
“Our performance naturally reflects the unusually quiet secondary markets that we experienced in 2021, particularly in the first half of the year. However, as market conditions started to improve in the second half, TP ICAP recovered most of the ground and grew overall market share,” said Nicolas Breteau, the CEO of TP ICAP.
Indeed, the revenue of the company showed resilience and came in at £1.86 billion, which is slightly higher than the previous years £1.79 billion. But, Liquidnet turned out to be a successful bet for the company as it brought in £159 million in revenue post-acquisition.
Without adding Liquidnet‘s numbers, TP ICAP’s annual revenue lowered by 1 percent in 2021, which is in line with the guidance provided by the company earlier.
Now, the group is focused on diversifying its revenue stream, bringing 42 percent of its total revenue from non-global broking businesses. Meanwhile, the global broking business of the group declined by 2 percent.
Data and analytics business within Parameta Solutions, which generates a high margin, grew by 10 percent last year.
Cautious on the Outlook
TP ICAP already saw 16 percent in revenue growth until March 11, when compared to the same period of the previous year. In addition, the figure is 4 percent higher without business from Liquidnet.
But, the company is cautious of the market conditions and did not put down any absolute number or range, saying “predicting future market activity is difficult.”
“Market volatility has continued at more elevated levels in 2022, with the return of inflation and geopolitical uncertainty driving higher volumes across many of our markets,” Breteau added.
“While it is too early to judge whether this activity will be sustained, we believe the results of our many actions will show through in improved performance across the group in 2022 and beyond.”


Did INGOT close your account and seize the accumulated funds in it? Did the broker prevent you from withdrawing your funds, including your deposited capital? Faced a capital loss due to frequent slippage in your trade order execution? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed their frustration over these alleged trading incidents. In this INGOT review article, we have examined these allegations and share our views on the broker’s regulatory oversight.

The reputation of OW Markets, a Seychelles-based forex brokerage entity, seems to have taken a hit amid a growing number of user complaints recently. They complained about slow withdrawals, poor response from customer support officials, and profit deletions. Enraged by these alleged trading activities, traders have given their sharp reactions on broker review platforms. If you are one of the affected traders or are planning to trade with it, this OW Markets review is meant just for you! Here, we will not only review the user complaints but also share its regulatory details. A comprehensive guide will help you make an informed financial decision.

The rupee bounced to 95.20 but RBI's forex reserves took a brutal $8.1 billion hit in a single week — here is what every Indian investor needs to understand right now.
CMC MARKETS presents a mixed picture for forex traders, earning a moderate overall rating of 6.4 out of 10 based on 228 reviews and a "Use with Caution" designation. The broker demonstrates notable strengths that have resonated with the majority of its client base, particularly its user-friendly interface that simplifies the trading experience, responsive customer support that addresses initial inquiries effectively, and a solid reputation for safety that provides some reassurance to traders. These positive attributes are reflected in the sentiment distribution, where 150 reviews were positive compared to just 47 negative ones, suggesting that many traders have had satisfactory experiences with the platform. However, the 20.6% negative rate cannot be ignored, as it highlights recurring concerns that potential clients should carefully consider.