Abstract:Liquidnet brought in £159 million since its acquisition. The group is now focused on revenue diversification.

TP ICAP, the world‘s biggest inter-deal broker, published its annual financials for 2021, reporting more than 81 percent drop in its profits for the 12 months. It generated £24 million as pre-tax profits last year compared to 2020’s £129 million.
Additionally, the basic earnings per share of the company plunged to 0.7 pence from 15.4 pence in the prior year.
“Our performance naturally reflects the unusually quiet secondary markets that we experienced in 2021, particularly in the first half of the year. However, as market conditions started to improve in the second half, TP ICAP recovered most of the ground and grew overall market share,” said Nicolas Breteau, the CEO of TP ICAP.
Indeed, the revenue of the company showed resilience and came in at £1.86 billion, which is slightly higher than the previous years £1.79 billion. But, Liquidnet turned out to be a successful bet for the company as it brought in £159 million in revenue post-acquisition.
Without adding Liquidnet‘s numbers, TP ICAP’s annual revenue lowered by 1 percent in 2021, which is in line with the guidance provided by the company earlier.
Now, the group is focused on diversifying its revenue stream, bringing 42 percent of its total revenue from non-global broking businesses. Meanwhile, the global broking business of the group declined by 2 percent.
Data and analytics business within Parameta Solutions, which generates a high margin, grew by 10 percent last year.
Cautious on the Outlook
TP ICAP already saw 16 percent in revenue growth until March 11, when compared to the same period of the previous year. In addition, the figure is 4 percent higher without business from Liquidnet.
But, the company is cautious of the market conditions and did not put down any absolute number or range, saying “predicting future market activity is difficult.”
“Market volatility has continued at more elevated levels in 2022, with the return of inflation and geopolitical uncertainty driving higher volumes across many of our markets,” Breteau added.
“While it is too early to judge whether this activity will be sustained, we believe the results of our many actions will show through in improved performance across the group in 2022 and beyond.”


If you have spent even a week inside trading communities lately, you already know the pitch by heart. Pass a quick "challenge," get handed a funded account worth tens of thousands of dollars, and keep up to 80% of everything you make. No risking your own savings, no slow grind of building capital from scratch — just skill, a small fee, and a fast track to the big leagues. It is the exact dream every new trader is secretly chasing, and an entire industry has sprung up to sell it. XPO Fund is one of the louder voices selling that story right now. Its website is slick, its plans sound generous, and its marketing leans hard on words like "industry's lowest fee" and "fast payouts." But before you reach for your card, there is one number sitting quietly on this firm's profile — a number it would rather you scroll past — that every experienced trader would beg you to look at first. And no, it is not the profit split. Let's pull XPO Fund apart piece by piece: what it actually is, who is real

Every broker with a marketing budget now slaps the letters "ECN" on its homepage. Few of them actually deliver what those letters promise. For a serious trader — a scalper, a day trader, an algo trader, anyone whose edge lives or dies on execution quality — the gap between a true ECN broker and a market maker wearing an ECN costume can quietly cost you hundreds of pips a year in slippage, requotes, and inflated spreads. So we cut through the marketing, looked at the brokers that genuinely offer raw pricing and deep liquidity, and cross-checked every one of them on WikiFX. Here are the six ECN accounts that actually earn the label in 2026 — ranked. First, a short primer, because understanding ECN is what lets you judge these brokers properly.

If you have been shopping around for a forex broker and landed on FX Novus and VCG Markets, you have stumbled onto a genuinely instructive pair. On the surface they look like cousins: both are relatively young, both wave around multi-asset trading and tight spreads, and both operate from the kind of offshore corners of the world that should make any beginner slow down. But dig into the data on WikiFX and the two part ways sharply. One carries active, screaming red flags. The other is merely standing in a yellow zone. Neither is what a cautious newcomer would call "safe" — but understanding how they differ is exactly the kind of lesson that protects your money. Let's put them head to head, decode the jargon along the way, and reach an honest verdict.

There are few feelings in trading more sickening than this one: you funded your account, you walked away confident your money was safe, and when you came back to check on it, the platform calmly informed you that your login details were wrong. Not your trades — your very identity, locked out. And on the other side of that login screen sits a balance you can no longer touch and a support team that has gone silent. That is the heart of a complaint filed against New Frontier on WikiFX. One trader reported depositing 40,500 pesos, returning to log in with the exact email and password they had registered, and being told the data was "incorrect" — which, in their words, meant their earnings had simply been taken. Customer service, they said, did not react. Let's look closely at this broker, what makes its profile so unsettling, and why verification here is not optional.