Abstract:CLSA Premium Limited (HKG:6877), a forex broker headquartered in Hong Kong, has dodged another business wind-up attempt as a majority of shareholders voted against the proposal on Friday.

Around 80 percent of shareholders of the broker voted against the wind-up resolution.
At least 75 percent of votes are required to pass any such resolutions.
It was the third wind-up attempt that the shareholders of the brokers have voted against within the last couple of years.
KVB Holdings, which is one of the shareholders of the broker, moved the resolution to wind up the business last month. This shareholder also made earlier attempts to close the business but failed.
As much as 80 percent of the CLSA shareholders voted against the wind-up resolution, whereas only 20 percent of the shareholders voted in favor. To pass the resolution seeking the companys closure, at least 75 percent of the votes needed to be in favor.
KVB Holdings itself holds around 14.75 percent of CLSA Premiums issued share capital.
“As at the date of the EGM, the total number of issued Shares was 2,033,290,000 Shares, which was the total number of Shares entitling Shareholders to attend and vote for or against the Resolution at the EGM,” the notice published after the voting stated.
“It is noted that no parties had indicated in the Circular their intention to vote against or abstain from voting on the Resolution at the EGM.”
A Troubled Broker
CLSA now operates in Hong Kong and Australia. The broker also had a regulated presence in New Zealand, but it was forced to exit from that market for some serious anti-money laundering (AML ) breaches. It even had to pay a monetary fine of NZ$770,000 (around $546,676) to the Kiwi financial market regulator.
Meanwhile, the broker ended the first half of 2021 with around $3.8 million in losses and issued a profit warning earlier this month with approximately HK$57 million in expected annual losses for 2021, Finance Magnates reported earlier.


Did PocketOption block your trading account while it still had funds? Did the forex broker cancel the profits made on your investments? Have you witnessed trading losses due to trade manipulation? Did your deposit fail to show up on the PocketOption login? These are some reported user allegations against the brokerage entity. These allegations hint at a potential operational glitch at the broker’s end. To ensure an informed financial decision, we have conducted an extensive PocketOption review sharing user allegations and a regulatory oversight the broker is under.

If you open a random forex beginner’s trading platform, the screen will almost certainly show just one chart: EURUSD (the euro against the US dollar). It is nearly everyone’s default starting point - the most heavily traded pair in the world, with tight spreads and endless tutorials. Choosing it as your first pair is not a mistake. But the surprising part comes from a different scene. When you ask a group of traders who have actually traded for several years - and survived - which pairs they trade, you get answers that differ wildly. Some watch only 4 pairs, with a list that does not change for years. Others track 27 or 28, fitting nearly every major and cross pair into their system.

Spreads. The single forex cost that quietly eats into every trade you place, every single day, regardless of whether you win or lose. For active traders in India and Pakistan — where most retail traders run on tight margins and bigger position sizes — the difference between a 0.6-pip spread and a 1.6-pip spread can be the difference between a profitable month and a losing one. But here is what most "best spreads" articles will not tell you: a broker advertising 0.0-pip spreads is almost meaningless if they slip your orders by 5 pips during news, freeze your withdrawals, or appear on the RBI Alert List. Real-world spread cost is only one part of the equation. Real-world total cost — including commission, slippage, execution quality, and regulatory protection — is what actually determines whether you keep your profits. This is WikiFX's 2026 ranking of the lowest-spread brokers serving South Asian retail traders, factoring in not just headline numbers but operational reality.

naqdi, a South Africa-based forex broker, is reportedly facing criticism from users over the long-pending withdrawal cases. Some users reported four to eight months of unresolved fund withdrawal requests. With no support over these requests, their frustration became evident in the naqdi reviews they shared online. This article sheds light on those complaints while giving users a view of the broker’s regulatory status