Abstract:An investigation into JP Markets has uncovered how the South African-based online forex broker has allegedly been trading against its clients and tampering with trading circumstances in order to drive down high earners' profitability while increasing the firm's.

An investigation into JP Markets has revealed how the South African-based online forex broker has apparently been operating in “absolute conflict” with its clients – trading against them and meddling with the trading conditions in a bid to drive down high earners‘ profitability and hike up the firm’s.
This according to papers filed by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in the South Gauteng High Court on Tuesday.
The FSCA suspended JP Markets financial services provider (FSP) license in June and is now moving to liquidate the company.
In the papers, Kedibone Dikokwe – who heads up the business supervision division at the FSCA – said while the companys core business model involved operating under an FSP licence, it had “structured its dealings in such a manner that it trades with or against its clients, acting as the principal”.
“This means that JP Markets core operating model creates an absolute conflict with each one of its clients. For every loss that a client makes on a transaction, JP Markets makes an equal and corresponding profit”.
The investigation into JP Markets – which is still ongoing – came in response to a barrage of complaints from clients, mainly that the firm had failed to pay out or that they had suffered losses due to interrupted access to the platform.
Described on its website as a “global Forex powerhouse” and “South Africa and Africas largest Forex broker,” JP Markets was in 2016 issued with a category 1 license to – as Dikokwe explained – “provide advice and render intermediary services in respect of derivative instruments and deposits as defined in the Banks Act”.
But during the course of investigations, a different picture of the companys operations emerged.
“JP Markets offered their clients access to a platform to trade in CFDs (contracts for difference). Clients opened accounts and deposited funds into one of the bank accounts in the name of and under the full control of JP Markets. A deposit would then permit the client to trade in forex exchange CFDs to the extent of the deposited funds. Clients would enter transactions and make profits or make losses, as the underlying forex exchange moved up or down,” she said.
“However, the clients were not trading on an online decentralised global financial market; they were merely entering trades on a platform that was no more than an off-the-shelf software application that recorded these trades. In fact, clients were purchasing CFDs issued by JP Markets … JP Markets required an over-the-counter derivative provider licence to conduct these services lawfully.”
The investigations had further revealed a separate so-called “toxic” group – with different trading conditions – had been created for high earners, who were unknowingly moved there.
Pakistani resident Saad Sidat – who managed the platform – blew the lid when he was interviewed by investigators.
“According to Sidat, JP Markets would also get rid of some ‘toxic’ clients by refusing withdrawal requests as some of the clients unexpectedly still profited while trading in the ‘toxic’ group,” Dikokwe said.
When its license was suspended, JP Markets was barred from concluding any new business but, said Dikokwe, the company had not complied.
“The authority considers that the interests of JP Markets clients and members of the public require that the company be liquidated,” she said.
The urgent application is expected to be heard later this month. In the meantime, the FSCA said in a statement this week that JP Marketss bank accounts had been frozen.
JP Markets did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.

Long Asia Group, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker, has come under increasing scrutiny as a growing number of traders report troubling experiences with the broker’s operations. User feedback highlights recurring issues such as delayed or blocked withdrawals, sudden communication breakdowns, and a lack of clear accountability once funds are deposited. Several traders claim that while small withdrawals may initially go through, larger payout requests often face unexplained obstacles. More concerning are allegations suggesting that the broker may no longer be operating transparently, with users reporting prolonged silence, unresolved complaints and suspected fund mishandling. These patterns have raised serious questions about Long Asia Group’s reliability and overall legitimacy, prompting traders to exercise extreme caution before engaging with the broker. For more details, keep reading this LONG ASIA review article, where we have elaborated on the traders’ pain wit

Has your MY MAA MARKETS forex trading experience been nothing short of a financial misery? Do you fail to gain the forex broker’s approval for fund withdrawals? Were you denied withdrawals on the grounds of fake accusations concerning system abuse and hedging? Does the broker deliberately cause you unwarranted slippage as you start executing winning trades? Do you feel the broker is unregulated? Your concerns seem genuine, as many traders have accused the broker of serious financial misconduct. In this MY MAA MARKETS review article, we have investigated some trader complaints. Take a look!

AssetsFX exposure reveals 5 scam‑like warning signs: unregulated operations, shaky fund safety, and alarming trader complaints you can’t afford to ignore.

PRCBroker is accused of withholding $1.13M in profits and freezing withdrawals. Read the details and decide if this broker is right for you.