Abstract:The firm plans to separately report its financials of three divisions from next quarter.

It is expecting the crypto business to be a growth enabler.
NAGA Group (XETRA: N4G) on Friday published its Q1 of 2022 financials, reporting revenue of EUR 18 million, which is a 63 percent increase year-over-year. The EBITDA for the period came in at EUR 5 million, which is up from Q1 of 2021‘s EUR 3 million. These figures were generated from the company’s brokerage business.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London.
“We are happy to see a dynamic start into 2022 and NAGA continuing steady towards its targets,” said Benjamin Bilski, who is heading NAGA Group as its CEO.
“The unfortunate escalation in Ukraine has indeed affected client appetite during Q1 but started to recover by the end of March.”
The headquarters of the German company ended 2021 with record numbers, generating a total revenue of EUR 55.3 million and an EBITDA of EUR 12.8 million.
NAGA made its name as a copy-trading service provider. But now, the company has expanded into other financial services businesses. The company is now planning to separately report the figures from its neo brokerage, crypto trading and payments platform.
“All our platforms are by now live and have a clear monetization model in place. Now it's all about scaling marketing activities and operations in each vertical,” Bilski added.
New Crypto License
Meanwhile, NAGA is focused on geographical expansion, particularly with its new crypto business. NAGAX, which is the companys crypto exchange brand and was launched last month, gained the Estonian crypto license last month and is expecting to gain two more crypto asset service provider licenses by the second quarter of the year.
Further, the company is exploring strategic acquisitions in Europe and Southeast Asia to accelerate its expansion plan.
“There is no doubt that the future lies with fully licensed and compliant companies in our very dynamic and fast-paced world,” Bilski said.
“[Crypto] is expected to be an important growth enabler in all three verticals we operate in. Hence, we see licensing and expanding our regulatory map as a core priority.”

The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has grown remarkably recently. However, it has also amplified the scope for financial fraud. One such is the rapid use of deepfake technology involving AI-generated videos, images and audio clips imitating real people. Fraudsters are leveraging these technologies to impersonate financial advisers, celebrities, business leaders and government officials to lure victims into fake investment schemes. Understanding the emerging implications, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has cautioned investors of investment avenues promoted through convincing AI-generated content. Seemingly authentic, deepfakes are designed to manipulate trust and make people transfer funds before authenticating the investment’s legitimacy.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

ABET, a Bulgaria-based brokerage firm, faces severe allegations from users for the reportedly inefficient way it handles their funds. While some alleged illegitimate account blocks by the broker, others reported fund scams and trade manipulations. These ABET reviews have raised question marks over the broker’s legitimacy.