Abstract:The agency alleges the defendants falsely claimed to trade forex utilizing a highly successful automated trading robot with guaranteed coverage of losses.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has filed a civil enforcement action against five individuals and five companies with fraud, misappropriation, and registration violations in connection with a fraudulent foreign currency (forex) scheme.
The regulator charged Ukraine-based Borys Konovalenko, Canada-based Alla Skala, as well as three individuals based in the United States: Jase Davis, Timothy Stubbs, Anna Shymko, and Timothy Stubbs.
$58 MILLION STOLEN IN FOUR YEARSAll five individuals are involved in the alleged FX scam ROFX and acted as a common enterprise to fraudulently solicit and misappropriate at least $58 million from U.S. and international customers for purported trading in forex.
The scheme may have lasted for nearly four years – from January 2018 through September 2021 – and over 1,100 customers opened trading accounts through the ROFX.net website and deposited funds via checks or wires to bank accounts in the name of one or more of the companies, all controlled by the individual defendants, the CFTC stated.
The agency alleges the defendants falsely claimed to trade forex utilizing a highly successful automated trading robot with guaranteed coverage of losses.
During the relevant period, the defendants received at least $58 million from customers, all of which was misappropriated by wiring to non-trading corporate entities in Poland, Thailand, and elsewhere, as well as to the individual defendants themselves, said the CFTC.
VICTIMS SUED ROFX FOUNDERS IN 2021The companies allegedly acted as futures commission merchants by doing business as ROFX, soliciting or accepting orders for retail forex transactions via the ROFX website, and accepting funds in or in connection with such transactions without being registered with the CFTC.
The CFTC seeks restitution to defrauded customers, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, permanent registration and trading bans, and permanent injunctions against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.
Restitution orders may not result in the recovery of money lost, because the wrongdoers may not have sufficient funds or assets.
In September 2021, dozens of victims have taken ROFX and its founders to Court over alleged fraud. At the time, there were letters from 300 victims in support of forming a class action.
Individual defendants at the time included Andrei Fetin, Anna Shymko, Anton Bilous, Borys Konovalenko, Dmytro Fokin, Jorge Luis Castillo, Manuchar Daraselia, Mikhail Rymanov, Natalia Los, Nattpemol Krinara, PapahraTsor Nrviratporn, Peter Mogilniy, Stanislav Khomenko, and Youras Ziankovich.
According to the plaintiffs, ROFXs conduct occurred as early as 2016.

Is withdrawal denial becoming a constant cause of worry for you at Zacks Trade? Despite multiple attempts, including contacting the customer support official, have you failed to receive access to your funds? Dealt with capital losses because of deliberate trade manipulation by the United States-based broker? Many traders have reportedly faced similar issues. A few of them made their displeasure known to all by writing negative Zacks Trade reviews. In this article, we have revealed all these. Read on to find the exposure claims.

When choosing a broker, the most important thing for any trader is making sure the company follows proper rules and regulations. This helps protect your capital, ensure fair treatment, and give you options if problems arise. We know that checking a broker's regulatory status can be confusing. That's why we're giving you a detailed, fact-based review of Moneta Markets. The simple answer is that Moneta Markets works through multiple companies in different countries. This means the brand has licenses from various places around the world, including top-level regulators such as the UK's FCA and regional ones like South Africa's FSCA. However, it also includes offshore companies, which come with different risks. This article will explain each license, examine the companies behind the Moneta Markets brand, and analyze exactly what this regulatory setup means for you as a trader. We'll base our review on public regulatory information and real user experiences to give you a clear and honest pi

When checking out a forex broker, traders often deal with lots of mixed information. Moneta Markets is a perfect example of this problem. On one side, it shows itself as a well-established, regulated broker with good trading conditions that bring in thousands of clients. On the other side, the internet is full of serious scam allegations, especially about holding back people's capital. This creates an important question for any future trader: is Moneta Markets a legitimate partner or a clever trap? This investigation wants to cut through all the confusion. We will not give you a simple "yes" or "no" answer. Instead, we will do a balanced and fact-based analysis to help you make a smart decision. We will break down the clear signs of its legitimacy, look closely at the specific details of negative complaints, and compare this conflicting evidence. Our analysis is based on facts you can check, including the broker's official regulatory status, real-world operational checks, and a deep l

Have you witnessed a withdrawal freeze by JustForex, a Seychelles-based forex broker? Did you face wallet issues while trading with the broker? Failing to access either your deposit or profit amount despite completing the verification process? Facing capital losses due to the manipulated charts on the trading platform? You are not alone! These alleged issues have surfaced on broker review platforms. In this JustForex review article, we have examined these issues faced by traders. Keep reading!