Abstract:Generally, forex brokers do not have any relationship with your local tax bureau. They are just private entities that are running a business operation on their own. Therefore, if a forex broker were to ask for any tax payments from you on behalf of the tax bureau, do not make such payments by any means. Unfortunately, that is a sign that one of your feet is already caught in its trap. That is a scammer, not a legitimate forex broker.


Todays forex broker in question is Jinkra International Finance Ltd which is registered in the United Kingdom.


This broker has a low WikiFX score as we discovered that both of its licenses are not valid. We would not recommend this broker to anyone.
Kindly select a forex broker that has a WikiFX score of at least 7.0 and above, alongside valid regulatory status and license(s)

WikiFX received this Exposure piece from a client of Jinkra named Fedor.

Jinkra insisted Fedor pay an income tax of approximately 5.4K USD. However, Fedor explained that he had never made a single cent of profit from trading with Jinkra, thus there should not be any tax charged on losses.

Fedor backed his stance with a screenshot showcasing a nett loss of 1.7K USD on his Jinkra account.

As Fedor refused to pay the quote-on-quote income tax, Jinkra fined him an additional 3K USD and threatened to freeze his account under the pretense of him conducting a malicious tax evasion act.

Eventually, even though Fedor still had many unanswered questions, Jinkra proceeded to freeze his account and funds regardless.


This is the problem an Indian trader reportedly faced on the Oron Trade platform. The Saint Lucia-based forex broker, despite receiving positive reviews for a low minimum deposit and a 5% monthly withdrawable bonus, continued to be criticized by users for its withdrawal processing. In this Oron Limited review, we have thoroughly investigated user claims and revealed whether this brokerage firm is regulated.

TopFX, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, continues to face user allegations globally, including those in South Asia. While complaints against the firm are on several issues, the one that is very concerning is the alleged account termination following a withdrawal request by traders upon profit generation on the platform. Traders have even opposed deposit delay and operational glitches concerning leverage. In this TopFX review, we have examined wide-ranging allegations against the broker while also sharing its regulatory framework for an informed decision-making experience.

octa, a Cyprus-based brokerage company, continues to face a common question from traders: when will my withdrawal requests be successfully processed? Maybe not literally, but contextually, it is allegedly the issue many traders have reported on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Regardless of the trader’s region, be it South Asia, Indonesia, Brazil or any other, most traders have expressed their concerns over the alleged withdrawal delays or denials. In this octa review, we have examined several user allegations concerning withdrawal issues and other problems encountered on the platform.

Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.