Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


M4Markets, a Seychelles-based forex broker, is accused of severe glitches by traders worldwide. While users have reported actively about withdrawal denials by the broker, the alleged excuse by it has not gone down well with its clients. Moreover, the accusation of illegitimate profit cancellation and serious platform glitches has not helped the broker’s reputation either. In this M4Markets review article, we have examined several cases alleging misconduct by the broker. Keep reading!

The regulatory system for Finalto is complicated. It doesn't work as just one company, but through several different business entities. Each entity has its own licenses in different countries. At first glance, the brand has strong, real licenses from top regulators, including the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). These credentials show a solid compliance system that serves professional and institutional clients.

When thinking about a broker such as Finalto, every trader wants to know one thing: Is Finalto legit, or is it a potential scam? This isn't just about finding someone to trade with - it's about protecting your investments. At first look, Finalto seems solid. It's been around for more than ten years and has licenses from multiple countries, which are good signs that it's real. But as we dig deeper, things become more complicated. While it has top-level licenses, there are also some warning signs, including official alerts about fake companies using its name and mixed information about where it actually operates. These problems need a closer look. This review goes beyond basic opinions. We'll look at real data about Finalto's licenses, its trading systems, what users actually say about it, and the serious warnings connected to its name. Our goal is to show you the facts clearly, so you can make your own smart decision about whether this broker can be trusted.

Traders looking into Finalto usually want a professional-level trading setup with strong liquidity and advanced technology. However, this review shows a complicated picture. Finalto is a brokerage with two sides - it has licenses from top international regulators, but also has serious warning signs, including a suspicious fake license alert. This analysis provides a complete Finalto Review by examining its regulatory status, services, and important pros and cons. This article gives an objective, fact-based breakdown to help financial professionals do their own careful research. The information comes from verified public data, allowing for an informed view of the broker's complex operations.