Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


Every broker with a marketing budget now slaps the letters "ECN" on its homepage. Few of them actually deliver what those letters promise. For a serious trader — a scalper, a day trader, an algo trader, anyone whose edge lives or dies on execution quality — the gap between a true ECN broker and a market maker wearing an ECN costume can quietly cost you hundreds of pips a year in slippage, requotes, and inflated spreads. So we cut through the marketing, looked at the brokers that genuinely offer raw pricing and deep liquidity, and cross-checked every one of them on WikiFX. Here are the six ECN accounts that actually earn the label in 2026 — ranked. First, a short primer, because understanding ECN is what lets you judge these brokers properly.

If you have been shopping around for a forex broker and landed on FX Novus and VCG Markets, you have stumbled onto a genuinely instructive pair. On the surface they look like cousins: both are relatively young, both wave around multi-asset trading and tight spreads, and both operate from the kind of offshore corners of the world that should make any beginner slow down. But dig into the data on WikiFX and the two part ways sharply. One carries active, screaming red flags. The other is merely standing in a yellow zone. Neither is what a cautious newcomer would call "safe" — but understanding how they differ is exactly the kind of lesson that protects your money. Let's put them head to head, decode the jargon along the way, and reach an honest verdict.

There are few feelings in trading more sickening than this one: you funded your account, you walked away confident your money was safe, and when you came back to check on it, the platform calmly informed you that your login details were wrong. Not your trades — your very identity, locked out. And on the other side of that login screen sits a balance you can no longer touch and a support team that has gone silent. That is the heart of a complaint filed against New Frontier on WikiFX. One trader reported depositing 40,500 pesos, returning to log in with the exact email and password they had registered, and being told the data was "incorrect" — which, in their words, meant their earnings had simply been taken. Customer service, they said, did not react. Let's look closely at this broker, what makes its profile so unsettling, and why verification here is not optional.

On May 30, WikiFX participated as an official partner at Wealth Expo Colombia 2026, engaging in extensive exchanges with investors, trading professionals, IBs, KOLs, fintech institutions, and industry partners from Latin America and around the world. The event attracted significant attention on-site, once again demonstrating WikiFX’s growing brand influence and industry recognition across the LATAM market.