Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


Backtesting remains one of the primary skills forex traders learn. By implementing a trading strategy based on historical currency pair price information, traders can view their past performance. The strategy leading to consistent profits during backtesting can raise confidence and lay a structured approach to the forex market. However, the path is not as simple as it may sound. Several traders tend to meet a harsh reality when transitioning to live trading. The strategy that seemed almost flawless on historical charts suddenly fails to deliver the results it did before. The sudden difference may not necessarily be because of a poor strategy. Rather, it indicates limitations concerning backtesting and several factors that play their part in a live market where conditions change frequently. It is thus important to understand these differences so that you can set realistic expectations and work on to achieve consistent success.

While searching for user reviews for Seacrest Markets, a South Africa-based brokerage entity, we came across some repeated complaint patterns about the alleged account disablement and the funds that were trapped in it. At the same time, users have complained that the broker unnecessarily extended the fund withdrawal review process to deny them their hard-earned funds. While they may be user allegations and not established facts yet, the emergence of many complaints against the brokerage firm calls for an in-depth investigation in this Seacrest Markets review.

We are living in the age of artificial intelligence, where everything including financial matters such as forex are rapidly influenced by this phenomenon. AI-powered tools are here to identify numerous trading opportunities and analyze thousands of data, all in seconds, becoming the preferred option for both retail and institutional traders. Regardless of its immense benefits, traders often question - Whether the AI can truly transform their forex trading experience or is it just like another technology offering scope for unrealistic expectations? While the AI can ensure faster trading and more informed decisions, it is never a sure shot way to profits. As a trader, you need to understand both the strengths and limitations of AI when it comes to generating real wealth.

Among the many DeltaFX complaints reviewed, the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) account lock during live trading was arguably the most prominent one. Secondly, a Turkish trader complained about the sudden closure of trades within five to six minutes. This raises suspicion over the trading manipulation at the broker. Looking further, we came across a complaint about the blockage of the trading account immediately after a deposit. In this DeltaFX review, we have examined several user allegations in 2026.