Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


When choosing a forex broker, the most important question is whether it's safe. You've probably searched "Is Core Prime Safe or Scam?" Because you need a clear answer before investing here. This review will give you that answer. To figure out if any broker can be trusted, we need to look at two main things: whether it's properly regulated and what real users say about it. This article will examine both for Core Prime. Our conclusion is simple: a careful look at available information shows serious warning signs, no proper regulation, and troubling Core Prime complaints. These aren't small problems - they're major red flags that any potential investor must consider before moving forward.

When checking out a broker, the first and most important question is about regulation. For traders looking into Core Prime, this is the main issue. We will tackle the search for Core Prime Regulation directly: our research, based on public information, shows that Core Prime works without a real license from any top financial authority. This finding right away brings up big questions about capital safety, business transparency, and whether their business practices are legitimate. The goal of this article is to give a detailed, fact-based look at the Core Prime license status and its complicated business structure. We want to help you, the trader, make a well-informed decision based on facts you can check, not marketing claims. Before we get into the details, it's an important rule in trading to always check a broker's claims. You can verify Core Prime's current regulatory status on platforms, such as WikiFX, to see the information yourself.

A recent complaint circulating on LinkedIn has placed broker STMarket under renewed scrutiny after a trader publicly alleged that the company withheld a withdrawal request worth US$3,250. The accusation surfaced shortly after the broker intensified its promotional activities surrounding financial education programmes in Cambodia, raising concerns among retail traders about the gap between marketing promises and customer experiences.

amana, a United Arab Emirates-based broker, is reportedly losing most of the traders’ favour recently. These traders have accused the brokerage entity of serious misconduct, including the long-pending fund withdrawal requests and poor customer services. Negative amana reviews have emerged across broker evaluation platforms such as WikiFX. Through this article, we have covered these allegations while providing our perspective on the broker’s regulatory status. This will help you make an informed call on whether you can trust amana with your capital.