Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework

Indian stock indices today, i.e., June 22, 2026, recorded growth, with the BSE Sensex rising 297.11 points to 77,094.07, recording a 0.38% jump. On the other hand, the NSE Nifty hit approximately 24100, largely aided by broad-based purchases across sectors, except for consumer durables and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG). The Nifty grew by 89.80 points (0.37%+) to 24,102.90.