Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


Did PocketOption block your trading account while it still had funds? Did the forex broker cancel the profits made on your investments? Have you witnessed trading losses due to trade manipulation? Did your deposit fail to show up on the PocketOption login? These are some reported user allegations against the brokerage entity. These allegations hint at a potential operational glitch at the broker’s end. To ensure an informed financial decision, we have conducted an extensive PocketOption review sharing user allegations and a regulatory oversight the broker is under.

If you open a random forex beginner’s trading platform, the screen will almost certainly show just one chart: EURUSD (the euro against the US dollar). It is nearly everyone’s default starting point - the most heavily traded pair in the world, with tight spreads and endless tutorials. Choosing it as your first pair is not a mistake. But the surprising part comes from a different scene. When you ask a group of traders who have actually traded for several years - and survived - which pairs they trade, you get answers that differ wildly. Some watch only 4 pairs, with a list that does not change for years. Others track 27 or 28, fitting nearly every major and cross pair into their system.

Spreads. The single forex cost that quietly eats into every trade you place, every single day, regardless of whether you win or lose. For active traders in India and Pakistan — where most retail traders run on tight margins and bigger position sizes — the difference between a 0.6-pip spread and a 1.6-pip spread can be the difference between a profitable month and a losing one. But here is what most "best spreads" articles will not tell you: a broker advertising 0.0-pip spreads is almost meaningless if they slip your orders by 5 pips during news, freeze your withdrawals, or appear on the RBI Alert List. Real-world spread cost is only one part of the equation. Real-world total cost — including commission, slippage, execution quality, and regulatory protection — is what actually determines whether you keep your profits. This is WikiFX's 2026 ranking of the lowest-spread brokers serving South Asian retail traders, factoring in not just headline numbers but operational reality.

naqdi, a South Africa-based forex broker, is reportedly facing criticism from users over the long-pending withdrawal cases. Some users reported four to eight months of unresolved fund withdrawal requests. With no support over these requests, their frustration became evident in the naqdi reviews they shared online. This article sheds light on those complaints while giving users a view of the broker’s regulatory status