Abstract:Account Executive of Fullbright found guilty of Fraud after series of investigation done by Hong Kong authorities

As a result of the fraud, a client lost $48,321.
Five years ago, Hong Kong's SFC slammed Kwong Shing with a lifetime industry ban.
The Eastern Magistrates' Court in Hong Kong found that Danny Fung Kwong Shing, who used to work as a Fulbright Securities account executive, was guilty of fraud.
This comes after the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) imposed a lifetime industry ban on Kwong Shing five years ago.
Kwong Shing was found guilty of lying or cheating when he bought and sold securities, which is a violation of the country's Securities and Futures Ordinance.
The SFC said on Friday that the former Fulbright Securities executive would stay in jail until his sentencing on October 27.
Kwong Shing pleaded guilty to all 25 charges brought against him by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
According to the SFC, during the hearing, Kwong Shing admitted to using two of his client's funds and securities without permission between August 2 and December 16, 2013.
The executive told the government watchdog that he used the two accounts to trade in eight stocks in a dishonest way. He purchased shares at a high price with money borrowed from one client and sold them at a low price to his friend's (and the client's) account.
The SFC stated that “these transactions resulted in a trading profit of $172,890 for his friend and a loss of $48,321 for his client.”
The Life Ban of SFC
The SFC fined Kwong Shing $542,071 and barred him from returning to the country's trading industry for life in 2017.
According to the financial markets regulator, between January 2013 and 2014, he executed 772 unauthorized transactions in the account of his friend-cum-client at Fulbright Securities, according to the financial markets regulator.
Also, the watchdog says that he made up a recording of a phone order so that Fulbright Securities would think the order was made by a friend.
Also, Kwong Shing posed as another friend-turned-client over the phone and put orders in for them at another Enhanced Securities Limited.
According to SFC, the executive profited for the second friend-cum-client while losing $2.6 million because his account was used without his permission.
This year, the SFC found that several online brokerages in Hong Kong were not following the rules.
The government agency looked at 50 licensed businesses in the country that offer brokerage, distribution, and advisory services online.
Also, the SFC found that 96% of brokers opened accounts without meeting the client face-to-face in the previous year.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a search engine for global corporate financial information. Its primary function is to search for basic information, regulatory licenses, credit evaluation, platform identification, and other services for participating foreign exchange trading companies.

There are over 39,000 brokers listed on the platform, both regulated and unregulated. WikiFX's administrators have been working hard with 30 financial regulators from around the world to ensure that the information they provide is correct.
Keep checking back for more Broker News.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.


When traders search for "Is ZarVista Safe or Scam," they want to know if their capital will be safe. Nice features and bonuses do not matter much if you can't trust the broker. This article skips the marketing talk and looks at real evidence about ZarVista's reputation. We want to examine actual user reviews, look into the many ZarVista Complaints, and check the broker's legal status to get a clear picture. The evidence we found shows serious warning signs and a pattern of major user problems, especially about the safety and access to funds. This report gives you the information you need to make a smart decision about this risky broker.

Scam alert on Pinnacle Pips: Unregulated, denies $20K withdrawal via pinnaclepips.com fraud. South Korea victims speaking out—avoid this forex scam now!

The question "Is ZarVista legit?" is a crucial one that has led many traders, probably including you, to this page. Worries about the safety of your capital, problems with withdrawing funds, and whether you can trust a broker are not just reasonable concerns—they are necessary for staying safe in financial markets. This article aims to give you a clear, fact-based answer to that question. Our goal is to conduct a comprehensive legitimacy check, examining ZarVista's regulatory status, real user experiences, and its transparency regarding its operations. To be upfront, our detailed analysis of publicly available information shows major warning signs that every potential investor must think about before working with this broker. While ZarVista presents itself as a modern, worldwide trading partner, the evidence we have gathered shows a high-risk operation where trader capital is not properly protected. We will go through this evidence step-by-step, giving you the power to make an informe

When choosing a trading broker, every trader asks the same important question: "Will my capital be safe?" To answer this question about ZarVista, we need to look at the facts carefully. While the broker does have licenses, our first look shows that all of its regulation comes from offshore locations. This fact alone creates serious concerns about how well traders are protected. When we look deeper into ZarVista regulation and license details, we find a complicated situation with many warning signs. Read on for more updates.