Abstract:A U.S. appeals court on Friday affirmed a decision to throw out a $308.5 million jury verdict against Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) for allegedly infringing a patent related to digital rights management.

A U.S. appeals court on Friday affirmed a decision to throw out a $308.5 million jury verdict against Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) for allegedly infringing a patent related to digital rights management.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., upheld an East Texas federal judge's ruling that Personalized Media Communications LLC's patent was invalid because the company engaged in misconduct before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
PMC denied to comment on the decision. Representatives for Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
PMC, a patent licensing company, first sued Apple for infringing several patents in 2015. An East Texas jury said in August 2021 that the FairPlay software used in Apple's iTunes and App Store to decrypt movies, music and apps infringed one of the patents and awarded the company $308.5 million in damages.
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap overturned the verdict four months later. He said PMC's
patent was unenforceable because thecompany had used a “deliberate strategy of delay” in applying for the patent, representing a “conscious and egregious misuse of the statutory patent system.” Gilstrap said PMC had used an improper “submarine” strategy that some applicants employed before 1995 to delay patents from becoming public until a market developed for their invention.
The Federal Circuit affirmed Gilstrap in a 2-1 ruling, finding that PMC's “inequitable scheme to extend its patent rights” had prejudiced Apple.


The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.

Switched from one trading strategy to another but could not avert heavy losses? Wondering what went wrong despite your market analysis being spot on? It may not be a strategic issue then. It may just be that you chose the wrong lot size. Yes, a single oversized position can get your account exposed to far greater risks than you may imagine. You may be moved by the impressive profits with increasing lot sizes. But by doing so, you also invite a proportionate rise in losses. This is where you need to apply the essential 1% risk management principle. This rule helps you assess how much you can afford to lose if a trade does not go as planned.

User complaints regarding profit withdrawals have become an increasingly discussed issue among some Exfor traders, including those in South Asia. Trading profits never come easy; they come by spending hours understanding the fundamental and technical factors and their impact on different markets such as forex. However, what matters is whether you are able to receive them. For exfor clients, according to their complaints, this problem is worse! While they claim profits on the dashboard, the same do not reach their trading accounts, resulting in many negative exfor reviews. In this article, we have examined user allegations concerning several issues, including this common profit withdrawal problem.