Abstract:Wetuoke requested a 75,000 USD tax payment yet prior to releasing its client’s funds.

Wetuoke (www.wetuoke.com) is an online broker that provides CFDs for several trading instrucments, such as forex, swap, commodities, options and more.
WikiFX did a review on Wetuoke and failed to find any information about this brokers regulatory status. The reason for this investigation was because WikiFX received an Exposure submission from a Vietnamese trader, named Trang, who was unfairly treated by this broker.
Trang has a live trading account with Wetuoke but when he wanted to withdraw, he was told that he must pay a 15% income tax to the International Tax Bureau, worth more than 75,000 USD.
We at WikiFX would also want to highlight this scenario as a warning sign that should not be ignored by any means. Tax scams is one of the common tactics used by dubious forex brokers. WikiFX has witnessed many cases wherein such a broker scared their clients about tax payments in arrears and urged them to pay before they could process their withdrawal requests. Unfortunately, in most cases, despite receiving the so-called tax payments, the client still could not receive the withdrawals that they are end to.
It is crucial to remember that no brokers are directly linked to a nations tax bureau. If your broker is requesting for such tax payments and claiming that they are doing it on behalf of the government body, it is a trap. Be careful.




Once again, we would like to reiterate that traders and/or investors should know their rights clearly, as well as the red flags that you see coming from a forex broker. When in doubt, always do as much due diligence as possible. Conducting a thorough research is not overwhelming nor time consuming when you have WikiFX at your fingertips.
WikiFX being the dedicated global forex broker query platform, will continue to investigate this case to do our best in helping out our users.
If you spot any red flags presented by your forex broker, please feel free to contact WikiFX for help or advice through these mediums below:



FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.

Choosing a tier 1 liquidity forex is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how an institutional liquidity provider, bank liquidity forex, or interbank liquidity provider arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best tier 1 liquidity forex” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

MIFX review 2026: understand published commissions and spreads, the withdrawal process, Instant Withdrawal conditions, and the PT Monex Investindo Futures complaint route without turning community discussion into factual allegations.

Choosing a forex liquidity provider is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how a forex LP, FX liquidity provider, or liquidity provider forex arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best forex liquidity provider” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.