Abstract:Withdrawal of funds has always been one of the issues of great concern for investors.

While withdrawal problems do occur from time to time when trading with regulated brokers, they occur more frequently when investors are trading with illegal platforms.
Recently, several Malaysian investors have told WikiFX that they have encountered withdrawal problems, and Forbes Capital is the broker involved in the dispute with them.
Unable to withdraw funds despite paying the required fees
A user reported that he had inadvertently joined a WhatsApp group more than two months ago, where a so-called “professional teacher” shared trading strategies and signals, and dozens of group members often showed screenshots of their profits, echoing the teacher. The user at first just quietly watched them share screenshots, but after two months of looking at them, He was tempted and couldn't help investing. So he privately messaged a few of his groupmates to learn more about the situation. The groupmates all told him that they had made money following the teacher, and even made a lot of money. Then the victim opened an account with Forbes Capital based on their recommendations.
At first, he deposited only RM 35 (about $8) into his account, and it didn't take long for him to make a profit. The previous “teacher” then encouraged the victim to invest more money so that he could make more money, but the victim did not invest as the teacher said. In the meantime, his account continued to make profits of up to RM28,000 (about $6,402), a profit margin of 800%.
But will the “earned” money really go into the investor's pocket?
Forbes informed the victim that had had to top up his accounts with RM 3,000 (about $686) to withdraw the money. At this time, the victim, although suspected that this might be a scam, could not resist the temptation of huge profits and transferred the money to the other party as requested, but still could not withdraw his money. He submitted withdrawal requests for several times, but did not get any response, and finally had to quit the WhatsApp group.

More victims emerged
Another investor from Malaysia also had a similar experience with Forbes Capital. Just like the previous victim, her account was making a profit at first. But after some time, her account was inexplicably banned and she couldn't log in, no matter how she tried. The worst part was that she couldn't get back the RM3,000 principal she deposited.
Currently, Forbes Capital is still falsifying trading records and using them to advertise that investors can make large profits with this broker.

WikiFX reminds you
Forbes Capital is an unregulated and fraudulent broker that has no authority to provide financial services to clients.
To stop users from withdrawing their funds, the fraudulent trading platform often demands various inexplicable fees and threatens not to allow withdrawals without paying them. However, even if the user does pay the fees, the account balance cannot be withdrawn. This is because the funds deposited by the victims are not used for trading, but go directly into the pockets of the scammers. And the so-called “profits” are just some fake figures. Moreover, claiming that money can be withdrawn by paying a fee is just a way to make a final profit.
It is recommended that you check the regulatory status of your broker with WikiFX before investing and choose a regulated broker to reduce the risk of being scammed.


This is the problem an Indian trader reportedly faced on the Oron Trade platform. The Saint Lucia-based forex broker, despite receiving positive reviews for a low minimum deposit and a 5% monthly withdrawable bonus, continued to be criticized by users for its withdrawal processing. In this Oron Limited review, we have thoroughly investigated user claims and revealed whether this brokerage firm is regulated.

TopFX, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, continues to face user allegations globally, including those in South Asia. While complaints against the firm are on several issues, the one that is very concerning is the alleged account termination following a withdrawal request by traders upon profit generation on the platform. Traders have even opposed deposit delay and operational glitches concerning leverage. In this TopFX review, we have examined wide-ranging allegations against the broker while also sharing its regulatory framework for an informed decision-making experience.

octa, a Cyprus-based brokerage company, continues to face a common question from traders: when will my withdrawal requests be successfully processed? Maybe not literally, but contextually, it is allegedly the issue many traders have reported on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Regardless of the trader’s region, be it South Asia, Indonesia, Brazil or any other, most traders have expressed their concerns over the alleged withdrawal delays or denials. In this octa review, we have examined several user allegations concerning withdrawal issues and other problems encountered on the platform.

Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.