Abstract:NZD/USD was 0.17% higher at the time of writing after rising from a low of 0.6144 to a new high of 0.6161 in Tokyo market trading. The focus is on the Federal Reserve today following Tuesday's inflation report, which showed stable core inflation.

Highlight
• NZD/USD rose in Tokyo as investors eyed the Fed.
• The Fed is the main event after the release of the main US CPI on Tuesday.
NZD/USD was 0.17% higher at the time of writing after rising from a low of 0.6144 to a new high of 0.6161 in Tokyo market trading. The focus is on the Federal Reserve today following Tuesday's inflation report, which showed stable core inflation.
Data shows that the US Consumer Price Index rose a slight 0.1% last month after rising 0.4% in April, the core CPI rose 0.4% in May, rising by the same margin for three consecutive months. However, the Greenback trimmed the initial weakening because this figure is too high to match the Fed's 2% inflation target, so there is still a possibility that the FOMC will allow another 25-bp hike at the outcome of the FOMC meeting.
''The kiwi rose slightly this morning, and despite some ups and downs yesterday due to the US CPI data, the foreign exchange market is much more volatile than the bond market, with the 10-year US government bond trading in the 15bp range yesterday,'' analysts at ANZ Bank explains.
Although US bond yields are now back near their late-May highs, that has not helped the USD, partly because while the data has reinforced market calls that the Fed will 'miss' tomorrow, it also suggests that we will see more tightening. Later, and that will ultimately slow down the US economy,' the analysts added.
Regarding the Fed, the analysts at TD Securities said that they'maintain our long-held view that the Fed will tighten interest rates by 25bp in June to a range of 5.25%-5.50%. If the Fed decides to 'skip' the June meeting, we expect the decision to be accompanied by heavy communication , signalling a possible hike in July.
“Whether the Fed raises interest rates in June or July (or skips both), the USD is focused on nearing the end of the tightening campaign, which creates a risk of USD pullback in Semester 2,” said the analysts.

The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

Withdrawal delays are precisely the complaint we keep receiving on WikIFX, a veteran in the forex regulation inquiry space. While some users receive withdrawal access initially and find rejections on their applications later, some fail to receive a single approval. Some delays usually result from genuine compliance requirements that brokers need to adhere to. However, in many cases, traders have accused the broker of repeated excuses as part of its alleged strategy to deny a seamless fund release. A pending withdrawal cannot be an outright indicator of fraudulent activity. Financial institutions, including forex brokerage entities, need to abide by the anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. However, as the monitoring process stretches beyond weeks or months, traders become frustrated and raise questions over the broker’s reliability.

Switched from one trading strategy to another but could not avert heavy losses? Wondering what went wrong despite your market analysis being spot on? It may not be a strategic issue then. It may just be that you chose the wrong lot size. Yes, a single oversized position can get your account exposed to far greater risks than you may imagine. You may be moved by the impressive profits with increasing lot sizes. But by doing so, you also invite a proportionate rise in losses. This is where you need to apply the essential 1% risk management principle. This rule helps you assess how much you can afford to lose if a trade does not go as planned.