Abstract:The domestic currency is expected to remain within the range of RM4.64 to RM4.65 today.

An analyst noted that the ringgit started the day with gains against major currencies except for the US dollar.
According to Afzanizam Rashid, Chief Economist of Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd, the ringgit has been in an oversold position for a considerable period.
Consequently, it is reasonable to anticipate certain corrective movements. For instance, the ringgit may experience intermittent strengthening, particularly in cases where data indicators unveil vulnerabilities within the global economy.
Highlighting a recent example, the global Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector stood at 48.7 points in July, falling below the pivotal 50-point threshold. This indicates a growing pessimism among businesses worldwide, as more have turned cautious.
Simultaneously, he observed that investors are eagerly awaiting the speech by Jerome Powell, Chair of the US Federal Reserve (Fed), scheduled for the Jackson Hole Symposium tonight. This address is expected to provide additional insights into the future course of US monetary policy.
The indications suggest that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to deliver a definitive message, despite various data signals hinting at the potential for a shift in monetary policy approach.
“In light of this, it is anticipated that the ringgit will maintain a range approximately between RM4.64 and RM4.65 against the US dollar,” he stated.
As of 9 AM, the domestic currency showed a slight decrease, trading at 4.6535/4.6570 against the US dollar, compared to the previous day's close of 4.6435/4.6485.
During the initial trading session, the domestic currency gained ground against the Japanese yen, trading at 3.1865/3.1891 compared to 3.1932/3.1968 at the previous day's close. It also strengthened against the euro, reaching 5.0230/5.0268 from 5.0373/5.0427, and saw a slight increase against the British pound, trading at 5.8578/5.8622 in contrast to 5.8829/5.8892 previously.
Conversely, the local currency exhibited declines against several ASEAN currencies, although it remained nearly unchanged against the Singapore dollar, hovering at 3.4298/3.4326 from 3.4292/3.4332 recorded at Thursday's close.
Against other regional currencies, it faced depreciation, moving lower against the Thai baht to 13.2749/13.2905 from 13.2645/13.2848 on the previous day's close. Similarly, it weakened against the Indonesian rupiah, trading at 305.1/305.5 compared to 304.5/305.0 previously, and experienced a decrease against the Philippine peso, reaching 8.19/8.21 from 8.17/8.19 on Thursday.


A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact

Trust has always been a widely discussed topic in the forex industry. When genuine, rational voices are drowned out, market participants struggle to discern which information is trustworthy amid a sea of complex data. This difficulty in establishing trust has placed industry transparency at the forefront of attention.

Before thinking about ZarVista, you need to understand the complete picture. At first glance, ZarVista (which used to be called Zara FX) presents itself as a modern, feature-packed trading company. It advertises appealing trading terms, different account options, and the powerful MetaTrader 5 platform. However, our detailed research shows a completely different reality. This broker has major warning signs, an extremely low trust rating, and a high-risk business model. This ZarVista review will examine the broker's promises, comparing what it advertises with actual evidence. We will explore the ZarVista Pros and Cons by looking at its rules and regulations, platform features, and most importantly, the large number of user complaints that show a troubling pattern. This investigation is based on careful analysis of information from independent verification websites like WikiFX, giving you an objective and fact-based review to help you make a smart decision and protect your capital.