Abstract:This article sheds light on the alarming experiences of a trader who encountered CM Trading.

About CM Trading

CM Trading is a broker that offers a diverse range of market instruments, including forex, CFDs, commodities, indices, stocks, and cryptocurrencies. They provide various account types catering to different trader requirements, including Islamic accounts. However, WikiFX has given this broker a relatively low score of 4.28/10. But why?
Is It Legit?
They provide various account types catering to different trader requirements, including Islamic accounts. The South Africa regulation claimed by this broker with license number 38782 is suspected to be a clone. The Seychelles FSA regulation with license number SD070 is an offshore regulation. While not all offshore regulations are inherently fraudulent, it is important to be aware of the associated risks.

The Case in Detail
In the world of online trading, brokers play a crucial role in connecting traders to the financial markets. However, not all brokers are created equal, and some unscrupulous entities take advantage of unsuspecting investors. One such case is that of CM Trading, as narrated by a victim who fell prey to their tactics.
1. The Deceptive Persuasion
The victim recounts the initial encounter with CM Trading, where persistent calls from the broker's representatives led to an unwanted association. Despite prior knowledge of negative reviews on Wikipedia and platforms like TrustPilot, the victim was persuaded to engage with CM Trading, with promises of personalized deals and attractive rebates.

2. The False Promises
In an effort to gain the victim's trust, CM Trading offered a 45% rebate and promised unrestricted withdrawal methods. These tempting offers lured the trader into a false sense of security, prompting a deposit and an exploration of CM Trading's services.



3. The Service Test
The victim, cautious about introducing their followers to CM Trading, decided to test the broker's services themselves. While initial withdrawals were processed smoothly, trading experiences revealed inconsistent spreads, slippage, and unexpected trade closures, which were attributed to “glitches.”
4. The Unwelcome Surprise
As the victim's trading account showed a profit, an unauthorized trade that resulted in a significant loss raised suspicions. CM Trading explained the loss as a mistake due to a financial department error, urging the victim to return the mistakenly transferred funds. The victim's reluctance due to the apparent absence of the funds led to further disputes.


5. The Disappearance
The trader's repeated efforts to recover the lost funds and withdraw their remaining balance led to further arguments and, ultimately, the disabling of their trading account. CM Trading's representatives blocked the victim on WhatsApp, leaving them with no recourse.
Conclusion
The victim's harrowing experience with CM Trading underscores the importance of conducting thorough research before choosing a broker. The promises of high rebates, flexible withdrawals, and exceptional trading conditions turned out to be mere enticements used to draw the victim into a web of deceit. This expose serves as a cautionary tale for potential traders, emphasizing the significance of due diligence in the world of online trading.


HIJA MARKETS, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage entity, is dealing with multiple trading complaints from users worldwide. Among the complaints, what captured our imagination was the $3,000 fee demand for the unfreezing of profits on the broker’s platform. Such a payment demand immediately raises legitimacy concerns regarding the brokerage firm. Complaints do not stop here; in fact, they suggest a pattern of disappearing funds and endless withdrawal denials. Many traders have accused the broker of carrying out illicit trading activities online. In this HIJA MARKETS review 2026, we have examined every user allegation against the brokerage firm. To give you more means to assess its legitimacy, we have given a thorough look into its regulatory framework.

EMAR Markets, a South Africa-based forex broker, allegedly never misses the opportunity to disappoint its traders, according to their reviews. The user allegations present a disturbing picture, with users repeatedly complaining about pending EMAR MARKETS withdrawal processing in the pretext of a data review process that reportedly seems to have no end. They even accused the broker of withholding funds even after they paid the verification fee worth 2,000 to 5,000 yuan as requested. Some users complained about the not-so-meaningful updates and complete communication halt that further made the overall trading scenario precarious. In this EMAR MARKETS review, we have examined serious user allegations to provide an overview of the overall situation. To further help you assess its legitimacy, we have provided a regulatory framework of this company.

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.