Abstract:Swiss neobank FlowBank stops new client applications and onboarding as financial regulator FINMA initiates bankruptcy proceedings.

FlowBank, a Swiss online neobank, unexpectedly ceased accepting new customer applications and stopped providing client onboarding. This comes following the announcement earlier today that the bank will be filing for bankruptcy by the Swiss financial authority, FINMA.
While FlowBank's primary website is still up and running, a maintenance notice has been added to the “Open an Account” page informing users that the onboarding procedure is now not accessible. Customers who need help opening an account can get in touch with customer support.

CEO Charles-Henri Sabet founded FlowBank in 2020, with an initial emphasis on banking and investing operations. It has, however, just changed its emphasis to online CFD trading, which was akin to Sabet's prior business endeavor, London Capital Group Ltd (LCG). The cryptocurrency investment firm CoinShares owns a sizeable 30% of FlowBank's ownership.
Concerns about FlowBank's financial stability led FINMA to decide to file the bank for bankruptcy. The regulator disclosed that FlowBank may be overindebted and no longer satisfies the minimal capital criteria required for its operations. With preliminary estimates showing that FlowBank's “privileged deposits” may be completely reimbursed from the bank's available cash, this step seeks to safeguard depositors.

It's still unclear how FlowBank's insolvency would affect LCG, a subsidiary. Despite not having submitted its 2022 financial accounts—which are late by over six months—LCG is purportedly in good standing and has a separate license from the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The group also comprises LCG Capital Markets Limited, an offshore company based in the Bahamas, and London Capital Group (Cyprus) Ltd, a company whose CySEC license was revoked in 2021.
The demise of FlowBank is the second big blow to neobrokers in Europe in less than a year. Due to ongoing losses, Amsterdam-based BUX was sold to ABN Amro in the latter part of last year. The demise of FlowBank highlights the financial risks that may occur in the quickly changing digital banking ecosystem and adds to the expanding list of issues affecting the neobank industry.
Stakeholders and customers are waiting for more information as it develops on FlowBank's bankruptcy procedures and the implications for the neobanking sector as a whole.
You may also access the latest news in the financial market news.html" target="_self" style="color: rgb(46, 82, 153);">here.


FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.

Choosing a tier 1 liquidity forex is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how an institutional liquidity provider, bank liquidity forex, or interbank liquidity provider arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best tier 1 liquidity forex” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

MIFX review 2026: understand published commissions and spreads, the withdrawal process, Instant Withdrawal conditions, and the PT Monex Investindo Futures complaint route without turning community discussion into factual allegations.

Choosing a forex liquidity provider is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how a forex LP, FX liquidity provider, or liquidity provider forex arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best forex liquidity provider” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.