Abstract:The FCA restricts London Capital Group's activities, barring them from onboarding new clients following FlowBank's bankruptcy.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of the United Kingdom (UK) has placed severe limitations on London Capital Group Ltd (LCG), a retail FX and contracts for differences (CFD) broker. The Swiss regulator launched this case after the insolvency of LCG's parent business, FlowBank.
The FCA's decision came after the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority terminated FlowBank's license and filed for bankruptcy on June 13, 2024. FlowBank, formed by former LCG CEO Charles-Henri Sabet, has suffered substantial financial difficulties, which has led to its present situation.
Charles-Henri Sabet, who created FlowBank in 2020, purchased LCG in 2018. He dissociated it from the now-defunct London Capital Group Holdings. LCG experienced significant changes under his tenure, including a shift in business strategy last year to become an introducing broker for IG, a former rival.
The FCA has imposed various rigorous limitations on LCG, including suspending new customer onboarding and accepting new client funds. LCG is also barred from engaging in any regulated operations, as well as disposing of or decreasing its own assets or client cash, whether in the UK or elsewhere.

According to a notification on LCG's UK website, “LCG has engaged an independent firm to determine the current financial status of the UK entity.” While this review is underway, LCG has requested that the FCA put some limits on our regulatory permits. The corporation has also advised its current customers to withdraw their monies, assuring them that they are safe in ring-fenced, authorized client money accounts.
LCG recommends that legacy customers who still have accounts with the business should remove their monies. These limitations do not, however, impact customers of LCG's Introducing Broker/Partnership business who have accounts with partner companies. Their accounts are operational as usual.
While LCG's UK business is subject to these limitations, its Bahamas sister entity has yet to post any regulatory notification, suggesting that it is unaffected by these events.
In reaction to the Swiss regulator's measures, FlowBank's main shareholder has sharply condemned the decision, dubbing it a breach of rights. The shareholder has said that he would pursue “all necessary procedures” against the regulator, implying that he may file a lawsuit.
The current scenario with LCG and FlowBank highlights the difficulties that financial organizations confront when negotiating regulatory frameworks across various countries. The FCA's decisive steps demonstrate the regulator's dedication to safeguarding clients' interests in the midst of financial turbulence. The ramifications for LCG's customers and the wider market will be carefully watched as the independent evaluation of its financial position progresses.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation’s website will be temporarily unavailable for three days from June 26-28, 2026, due to a scheduled system migration. The retirement body has intimated its over 290 million subscribers through a pop-up alert on the portal. It is titled - Important Notice: Scheduled System Migration and Temporary Service Unavailability. The EPFO expects users to maintain patience during the scheduled downtime.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.