Abstract:A 37-year-old Singaporean businessman, Ng Yu Zhi, is currently on trial for allegedly orchestrating one of the largest investment frauds in the country's history. The scheme reportedly defrauded more than 900 investors of SGD1.5 billion (approximately US$1.1 billion) between 2016 and 2021.

A 37-year-old Singaporean businessman, Ng Yu Zhi, is currently on trial for allegedly orchestrating one of the largest investment frauds in the country's history. The scheme reportedly defrauded more than 900 investors of SGD1.5 billion (approximately US$1.1 billion) between 2016 and 2021.
According to prosecutors, Ng misled investors by promoting a fictitious nickel trading venture. He claimed to have secured a lucrative deal with a major Australian mining company to purchase nickel at a discounted rate. However, no such deal existed. Instead, Ng operated a Ponzi-like structure, using funds from new investors to pay earlier participants, creating an illusion of profitability.
Victims of the scam included prominent figures such as wealth fund managers, highlighting the scale and sophistication of the operation. Prosecutors revealed that Ng funnelled approximately SGD481 million—nearly one-third of the defrauded funds—into his extravagant lifestyle.

Luxury assets purchased with the misappropriated money included four high-end properties valued at SGD20 million and artworks worth SGD5 million. He also acquired several luxury vehicles, such as a Porsche 911 GT3, Rolls-Royce Phantom, Lamborghini Aventador SVJ, and an Aston Martin Rapide.
Authorities have charged Ng with 42 offences, including fraudulent trading, cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust, and money laundering. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
The case underscores the growing problem of financial fraud in Singapore. According to a recent police report, the number of scam cases in the country rose by more than 16% year-on-year in the first half of 2024, reaching 26,587 incidents. These scams collectively caused losses exceeding SGD385.6 million.
Prosecutors described Ngs scheme as a well-crafted facade designed to deceive investors into believing in a profitable nickel trading enterprise. They emphasised that the supposed business was nothing more than a fabrication. The trial is expected to delve into the intricacies of the fraud, shedding light on how Ng managed to sustain the scheme for nearly five years.


In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

31 Malaysians rescued from Myawaddy scam center returned home after joint cross-border operation

WikiFX has launched the “Inside the Elite” Interview Series, featuring outstanding members of the newly formed Elite Committee. During the committee’s first offline gathering in Dubai, we conducted exclusive interviews and gained deeper insights into regional market dynamics and industry developments. Through this series, WikiFX aims to highlight the voices of professionals who are shaping the future of forex trading — from education and compliance to risk control, technology, and trader empowerment.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.