Abstract:A 37-year-old Singaporean businessman, Ng Yu Zhi, is currently on trial for allegedly orchestrating one of the largest investment frauds in the country's history. The scheme reportedly defrauded more than 900 investors of SGD1.5 billion (approximately US$1.1 billion) between 2016 and 2021.

A 37-year-old Singaporean businessman, Ng Yu Zhi, is currently on trial for allegedly orchestrating one of the largest investment frauds in the country's history. The scheme reportedly defrauded more than 900 investors of SGD1.5 billion (approximately US$1.1 billion) between 2016 and 2021.
According to prosecutors, Ng misled investors by promoting a fictitious nickel trading venture. He claimed to have secured a lucrative deal with a major Australian mining company to purchase nickel at a discounted rate. However, no such deal existed. Instead, Ng operated a Ponzi-like structure, using funds from new investors to pay earlier participants, creating an illusion of profitability.
Victims of the scam included prominent figures such as wealth fund managers, highlighting the scale and sophistication of the operation. Prosecutors revealed that Ng funnelled approximately SGD481 million—nearly one-third of the defrauded funds—into his extravagant lifestyle.

Luxury assets purchased with the misappropriated money included four high-end properties valued at SGD20 million and artworks worth SGD5 million. He also acquired several luxury vehicles, such as a Porsche 911 GT3, Rolls-Royce Phantom, Lamborghini Aventador SVJ, and an Aston Martin Rapide.
Authorities have charged Ng with 42 offences, including fraudulent trading, cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust, and money laundering. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
The case underscores the growing problem of financial fraud in Singapore. According to a recent police report, the number of scam cases in the country rose by more than 16% year-on-year in the first half of 2024, reaching 26,587 incidents. These scams collectively caused losses exceeding SGD385.6 million.
Prosecutors described Ngs scheme as a well-crafted facade designed to deceive investors into believing in a profitable nickel trading enterprise. They emphasised that the supposed business was nothing more than a fabrication. The trial is expected to delve into the intricacies of the fraud, shedding light on how Ng managed to sustain the scheme for nearly five years.


Do you find mBank services too slow or unresponsive? Do you find your account getting blocked? Failing to access your account online due to several systemic glitches? Can’t perform the transactions on the mBank app? Do you also witness inappropriate stop-level trade execution by the financial services provider? You are not alone! Frustrated by these unfortunate circumstances, many of its clients have shared negative mBank reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of the reviews. Read on!

For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici

For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.

Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!