Abstract:Malaysian influencer Hu Chang Mun, widely known as Ady Hu, has been detained in Taiwan for his alleged involvement in a fraudulent operation. The 31-year-old, who was reported missing earlier in December, was located by Taiwanese authorities after suspicions arose regarding his activities.

Malaysian influencer Hu Chang Mun, widely known as Ady Hu, has been detained in Taiwan for his alleged involvement in a fraudulent operation. The 31-year-old, who was reported missing earlier in December, was located by Taiwanese authorities after suspicions arose regarding his activities.
According to reports, Hu had informed his family and friends on 11 December that he was in Taiwan and intended to stay for several more months. Shortly after, he ceased communication, prompting his family in Bentong, Pahang, to file a police report. They also sought assistance from Bilut assemblyman Lee Chin Chen, who contacted the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Malaysia for help in locating Hu.
Mr Lee later confirmed that the office had responded, verifying Hu‘s whereabouts. However, developments took a surprising turn when Taiwan’s ETtoday News portal reported that a 31-year-old man named Hu had been apprehended by the Yuanlin Police Substation in Changhua district. The man, a tourist from Malaysia, was found to be involved in a scam network. Investigations revealed that Hu and the arrested individual were the same person.

The fraud case came to light when a middle-aged woman from Changhua district fell victim to an online investment platform promoted on social media. Enticed by promises of high returns, she conducted two in-person transactions with the group, handing over NT$2.3 million (approximately S$96,000). Realising she had been deceived, she alerted the authorities.
On 11 December, during a third transaction where the woman delivered an additional NT$2 million (approximately S$83,500), Taiwanese police intervened and arrested Hu at the scene. Further investigations revealed that Hus role in the operation was consistent with what Taiwanese media refer to as a “driver.” This individual is typically tasked with collecting cash from victims who have been tricked into withdrawing money.
Authorities explained that such “drivers” earn commissions based on the amounts they collect. Hu, who had entered Taiwan under the visa exemption policy, reportedly claimed that he was unaware of the fraudulent nature of the operation. He stated that he had been seeking to earn money during his holiday but had unknowingly become involved in a scam.
Following his arrest, the case was handed over to legal authorities on charges of fraud, money laundering, and violations of banking laws. Taiwanese prosecutors requested Hu‘s detention, which was approved. The authorities in Taiwan have since informed their Malaysian counterparts about Hu’s arrest.
While Malaysian officials have yet to issue a formal statement, the case highlights the growing involvement of foreigners in sophisticated scam networks in Taiwan.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework