Abstract:Warning: Zipphy Regulation is fake. Broker exposed for fraud and scams. Protect your funds and avoid risky platforms.

Zipphy presents itself as a modern trading platform offering MetaTrader 5 access, multiple account tiers, and promises of cashback and instant withdrawals. However, the evidence points to a troubling reality: Zipphy Regulation is non-existent. According to the brokers own disclosures and independent verification, Zipphy operates without a valid license. This raises immediate red flags about its legitimacy.

Customer complaints documented in the attached report reveal repeated withdrawal failures, aggressive upselling tactics, and suspiciously consistent “profitable trades” designed to lure investors. These patterns align with common hallmarks of fraudulent brokers.
Despite marketing itself as a global broker, Zipphy Regulation is unverifiable. No recognized authority (ASIC, FCA, CySEC, or others) lists Zipphy as a licensed entity. This absence of oversight means traders have no legal protection if disputes arise.

Zipphy offers a tiered account structure ranging from entry-level to premium packages.
| Account Type | Minimum Deposit | Leverage | Withdrawal Time | Notes |
| Classic | $100 | 1:100 | 96 hours | Fixed spreads |
| Islamic | $200 | 1:150 | 96 hours | Shariah-compliant |
| Funded | $1,000 | 1:150 | 72 hours | $1,000 “funded” bonus |
| Trader | $5,000 | 1:250 | 48 hours | Cashback guaranteed |
| Expert | $10,000 | 1:300 | 24 hours | Variable spreads |
| Exclusive | $25,000 | 1:500 | 12 hours | Events & trades |
| Premium | $50,000 | 1:1000 | Instant | High leverage risk |
Key Takeaway: The escalating deposit requirements and extreme leverage ratios (up to 1:1000) are highly risky. Legitimate brokers rarely offer such aggressive terms due to regulatory restrictions.
Zipphy claims to support:
However, multiple user reports highlight withdrawal failures. Cases include:
This pattern strongly suggests systemic withdrawal obstruction — a hallmark of scam operations.
Zipphy advertises access to MetaTrader 5 (desktop, web, mobile) with:
While MT5 is a legitimate platform, its availability does not validate Zipphy Regulation. Fraudulent brokers often piggyback on trusted software to appear credible.
Such high leverage magnifies risk. Regulated brokers typically cap leverage at 1:30 (EU/UK) or 1:50 (US). Zipphys extreme ratios are not only dangerous but also a clear indicator of its unregulated status.
| Broker | Regulation | Leverage Cap | Transparency | Withdrawal Reliability |
| Zipphy | None | 1:1000 | Low | Poor (blocked requests) |
| IG | FCA, ASIC | 1:30 AM | High | Reliable |
| Pepperstone | ASIC, FCA | 1:30–1:50 | High | Reliable |
| Exness | CySEC, FCA | 1:200 (pro) | Moderate | Reliable |
Observation: Competitors with valid regulations offer safer leverage limits, transparent fee structures, and proven withdrawal reliability. Zipphy fails across all these benchmarks.
Pros:
Cons:
Zipphy Regulation is fake. The broker operates without oversight, exposes traders to extreme leverage risks, and has a track record of blocked withdrawals. While its polished website and MT5 integration may appear convincing, the absence of licensing and repeated fraud complaints make Zipphy a high-risk platform.
Final Verdict: Zipphy is not a legitimate broker. Traders should avoid depositing funds and instead choose regulated alternatives with proven transparency and investor protection.


Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Deriv exposed via client cases of withdrawal issues, 13‑month refund delays, severe slippage, and disabled accounts despite multiple “regulated” licenses.

For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.