Abstract:Plus500 forex trading scam alert: multiple cases of blocked withdrawals. Read the warnings and safeguard your money!

Plus500 presents itself as a regulated forex and CFD broker, but numerous traders report severe withdrawal problems that raise red flags. Despite its licenses from top regulators like FCA and ASIC, user complaints about frozen funds and deceptive tactics suggest deeper issues. Download the WikiFX App to check broker legitimacy before trading.
Plus500 was founded in 2008 and has headquarters in Israel and offices worldwide. It offers over 2,800 CFDs on forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and cryptos via its proprietary platform. The broker claims tight spreads around 0.5 pips on EUR/USD and no commissions, with a $100 minimum deposit.

Traders can access leverage up to 1:30 for retail clients, plus demo accounts and risk tools such as stop-losses. Payments include Visa, PayPal, and Skrill, with no deposit fees but potential inactivity charges after three months. Still, these features dont shield users from the withdrawal nightmares detailed ahead.
Plus500 holds multiple licenses, including FCA (UK, #509909), ASIC (Australia, #417727), CYSEC (Cyprus, #250/14), and ISA (Israel). Its publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, adding some transparency. Client funds are segregated, protected by SSL encryption, and eligible for investor compensation.

Regulation doesnt mean flawless operations, as scam alerts on WikiFX highlight persistent complaints. Even top-tier oversight fails when brokers allegedly manipulate balances or delay payouts. Use the WikiFX App for real-time exposure on regulated scams.
Recent cases expose Plus500s withdrawal blocks, starting with a Belgian trader on December 5, 2025. He held 58.76 USDT but faced a maximum withdrawal limit of 33.76, which rejected withdrawals above that limit even though he had available funds. This forex scam tactic traps capital during shifts in unsupported countries.
Another Belgian user on December 4 couldnt withdraw without explanation, questioning the sudden “protection” after smooth prior payouts. German traders echoed this on the same day, citing unexplained cancellations after years of hassle-free trading. These patterns scream forex investment scam.
German complaints from December 2 reveal sketchy bonuses to hook newbies. One trader received an email promising a 750 SR (~$200) deposit, but only 450 SR was credited, with support dodging queries. This bait-and-switch draws in victims, then blocks exits—classic forex trading scam.
US users repeated this on November 18 and 6, 2025, with £280 or similar balances frozen post-verification, and no responses to statements. Owners labelled “assholes” for personal ethics aside, evidence points to deliberate trader rollback. WikiFX App users spot these red flags early.
A Hong Kong trader waited over a month for approval of a withdrawal on September 18, 2025. After submitting income proof and address docs, review stalled indefinitely—no timeline given. Such delays erode trust, mimicking the hallmarks of scam brokers despite regulation.
These arent isolated; they form a pattern of stalling tactics post-deposit. Traders pass KYC yet hit invisible walls on payouts. Stay safe—scan with the WikiFX App before funding any platform.
| Red Flag | Description | User Impact |
| Balance Manipulation | Max withdrawal shown below actual funds (e.g., 33.76 vs 58.76 USDT) | Prevents full access to profits |
| Sudden Country Blocks | Unsupported regions halt USDT transfers to exchanges | Traps funds during moves |
| Bonus Shortfalls | Promised deposits undelivered (750 SR vs 450 SR) | Baits with false incentives |
| Verification Hell | Endless doc requests, no resolution | Delays payouts indefinitely |
| Ghost Support | No replies to statements or queries | Leaves traders stranded |
This table summarises exposures from global users. Patterns match forex scams: easy deposits, hard withdrawals. Regulated or not, these violate fair trading norms.
Plus500 mandates same-method withdrawals up to deposit amounts, with spreads funding operations. Yet complaints show arbitrary caps and “protection” excuses emerging suddenly. Even verified accounts face £280+ freezes, hinting at liquidity grabs or compliance dodges.
Inactivity fees kick in after three months, but active traders hit walls first. Overnight fees and leverage amplify losses, priming excuses for holds. WikiFX App logs confirm this as a serial issue.
Plus500 shines with user-friendly web/mobile apps, 24/7 chat, and multilingual support. Demo accounts help beginners test 2,800 instruments commission-free. Tight spreads and no MT4 needed suit casual CFD traders.
But cons bite hard: no MetaTrader, limited support channels, and now rampant withdrawal woes. Inactivity fees of up to $10/month add insult to injury. For pros seeking reliability, these gaps spell danger—especially amid scam alerts.
Verify brokers via the WikiFX App before depositing—its your shield against forex scams. Spot withdrawal glitches early, like manipulated max amounts or bonus lies. Demand timelines on requests; escalate to regulators if stalled.

Report issues on WikiFX to expose more cases. Avoid high-leverage CFDs without exit proof. Your funds deserve better than the alleged traps at Plus500.
Plus500s regulation masks user torment from blocked USDT, ghosted verifications, and bonus fraud. Traders worldwide—from Belgium to Hong Kong—cry scam after smooth deposits turn sour. Heed this exposure: withdraw early, check the WikiFX App often, and dodge forex trading scams.


Mazi Finance is a trading company registered in Saint Lucia, an offshore location. Recently, it has received a lot of attention in the trading world. The company shows off many modern trading features, but when we look closer, we find many potential dangers. Before any trader thinks about opening an account, they need to understand the most important finding from our research: Mazi Finance does not have proper regulation. This single fact creates major warning signs about whether client capital is safe.

When you look for information about a forex broker, you often find a confusing mix of great reviews and serious warnings. This is especially true for Pemaxx, where traders have one main question: Is Pemaxx Safe or Scam? The internet has many different user experiences, making it hard to know what's true. This article won't give you a simple yes or no answer. Instead, we'll do an objective, fact-based study to help you make a smart choice. We'll look at the available information, focusing on real user reviews, common Pemaxx Complaints, and whether it follows proper regulations. By looking at patterns in both good and bad reports, we want to give you a clear picture of the risks and warning signs with this broker, helping you protect your capital.

The regulatory status of Pemaxx is a major concern for traders. When you search online, you can find the broker claiming to be regulated, but financial watchdog sites show serious warnings and user complaints. This creates a confusing and potentially risky situation for anyone considering an investment. The goal of this analysis is to clear up the confusion. We will examine the available information, explain the facts about the Pemaxx License status, and look at the risks for traders.

HFM users report withdrawal delays and missing funds. Read verified scam complaints, check regulatory info, and report your HFM case now.