Abstract: Canadian securities regulators said more than 7,586 fraudulent investment platforms and crypto scam websites targeting Canadians were deactivated between June 2025 and February 2026, covering over 13,000 related URLs.

Canadian securities regulators have released updated enforcement figures showing the scale of online investment fraud now being targeted across the country. According to the Canadian Securities Administrators, more than 7,586 fake investment platforms and crypto scam websites aimed at Canadians were deactivated between June 5, 2025, and February 12, 2026. The effort covered more than 13,000 individual URLs linked to those sites.
The numbers were published on March 3 as part of Fraud Prevention Month. The CSA said the campaign reflects a broader push to identify suspicious sites earlier and disrupt them before they can draw in more victims. Stan Magidson, who chairs the CSA and also leads the Alberta Securities Commission, said regulators are using both enforcement measures and technology-based tools to track and shut down fraudulent websites.
The latest release shows a sharp increase from the CSAs earlier update in December 2025, when regulators said a newer enforcement capability had helped disarm more than 3,900 fraudulent investment websites. The new figure suggests the campaign expanded significantly over the following two months, both in the number of sites affected and in the total volume of related web links tied to those operations.
Rather than focusing only on individual bad actors after losses occur, regulators appear to be putting more weight on disruption at the infrastructure level. In practice, that means cutting off access to websites that present fake investment offers, impersonate trading platforms, or use crypto-related narratives to attract deposits from retail users. The CSA did not frame the initiative as a one-off action, and said website deactivation figures will be added to its annual Year in Reviewpublication starting in 2026.
In its statement, the CSA described online investment fraud as an ongoing risk for Canadians and said securities regulators have increased coordination across sectors over the past year. The group also pointed to cooperation with law enforcement, regulatory partners, and industry bodies as part of the broader response to fraudulent online activity.
That matters because many scam sites no longer operate like crude, short-lived pages. They often imitate legitimate investment brands, use polished interfaces, and move quickly across domains or mirror pages when pressure builds. The CSA‘s latest figures suggest regulators are trying to keep pace by treating online fraud as a cross-platform enforcement problem rather than a series of isolated cases. This reading is based on the CSA’s description of coordinated, cross-sector efforts and its emphasis on large-scale site disruption.
Alongside the takedown update, the CSA again urged investors to verify the registration status of anyone offering investments or investment advice. The regulator specifically pointed users to its National Registration Search, which can be used to check whether a person or firm is properly registered.
That reminder is consistent with how many investment scams are structured. A website may look active, professional, and geographically relevant, yet still have no legal standing to offer securities-related services. For retail investors, a registration check remains one of the fastest ways to screen out entities that are presenting themselves as licensed without actually appearing in the official record. The CSA also advised anyone who believes they have been approached by a fraudulent investment operation, or may already be a victim, to contact their local securities regulator.
The latest release does not suggest the problem is shrinking. If anything, the jump from more than 3,900 deactivated websites in December to more than 7,586 by mid-February points to the scale and persistence of fraudulent online investment activity targeting Canadians. It also shows how closely investment scams and crypto-themed fraud now overlap in enforcement work.
For the market, the announcement is less about a single enforcement action and more about the shape of the current threat environment: large volumes of disposable domains, fast-moving scam infrastructure, and a regulatory response increasingly built around rapid detection and takedown. The CSAs decision to start publishing website deactivation statistics in its annual review suggests this has become a standing part of how Canadian regulators measure anti-fraud activity.
WikiFX is a global forex industry information platform dedicated to providing broker profiles, regulatory updates, field survey content, and risk-related news across multiple markets. We focus on helping readers better understand broker backgrounds, licensing status, and developments that may affect trading decisions.
We also follow regulatory actions, compliance issues, market disputes, and industry trends across the forex, CFD, and selected crypto-related sectors. Through ongoing editorial coverage and broker data services, WikiFX aims to offer clearer reference points in a fast-changing trading environment.


Are your funds stuck with OspreyFX, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Does your trade execution price always remain far away from the requested price due to heavy slippage? Does the broker, contrary to its claims of low-cost trading experience, widen spreads to inflate your costs? Like others, do you always witness constant fund withdrawal denials by the broker? In this OspreyFX review article, we have investigated complaints against the forex broker. Read on!

Did your good trading experience with TAG MARKETS reverse when applied for fund withdrawals at the Mauritius-based forex broker? Besides withdrawal denials, did you also witness account blocks or deletions by the broker? Did the broker’s customer support team fail to provide you a proper reason for these trading activities? Have you also witnessed glitches on deposit bonus? These allegations have only grown further in 2026. Read on as we share these allegations in this TAG MARKETS review article.

Is your trading experience with MYFX markets full of fund withdrawal denials despite repeated communications with its customer support team? Has the broker deleted all your profits? Did the broker accuse you of false trading strategy implementation while deleting your profits? There have been many such instances reported by traders against these activities online. In this MYFX Markets review article, we have shared some complaints. Take a look!

Exfor, a Malaysia-based forex broker, has allegedly been the centre of attention for all the wrong reasons. These include long-pending withdrawal denials, no communication or assistance from the broker’s customer support team, manipulated pricing upon a withdrawal request by the trader, and account blowups due to bonus-related issues. It’s the traders who allegedly bear the brunt of all these suspicious trading activities. A lot of them have criticized it on broker review platforms. We have highlighted some of their complaints in this Exfor review article. Take a look!