Abstract:An Indian and a South African trader investing in Just Markets have one thing in common - their reported $2,000 (approx.) loss on the platform. Both complaints have come on broker review platforms in 2026. Similarly, a Pakistani trader complained about the cancellation of a fund withdrawal request worth $2,700. We investigated most allegations that came in 2026 in this Just Markets review article.

An Indian and a South African trader investing in Just Markets have one thing in common - their reported $2,000 (approx.) loss on the platform. Both complaints have come on broker review platforms in 2026. Similarly, a Pakistani trader complained about the cancellation of a fund withdrawal request worth $2,700. We investigated most allegations that came in 2026 in this Just Markets review article.
Just Markets claims to be a multi-asset brokerage entity offering a plethora of trading products - Forex, Indices, Stocks, Commodities and Crypto. The company is listed as many as five entities, according to the information shared on its official website. They are -
The accounts offered cater especially to beginners with a very low minimum deposit of $10. A minimum spread of 0.3 pips is just what traders want to lower their overall trading cost. However, under volatile market conditions, spreads can widen and cause slippage too. At the same time, using an extensive leverage of 1:3000 can help you maximize your gain on the large-sized position you will likely acquire. However, an overleveraged account comes with a pronounced risk of unfortunate account blowups and margin calls. As a trader, it is advised to use it with discretion and in response to your position size. Commission-free trading may reduce overall transaction costs, depending on market conditions and the account type selected.
An Indian client reported a sudden loss of profits worth $2000 he generated. The system closed around 1 minute before the reported amount flashed. At the same time, a South African trader wrote that he was allegedly waiting since June 24, 2026, to find his $2,000 funds as requested on the platform. The Just Markets reviews shared below highlight this pressing concern.


A client from South Africa took strong exception to the constant money deduction reportedly happening while achieving gains and losses on the platform. According to the complaint, the client alleged that after depositing 8000 USD in his old account. The trader noticed illegitimate fund deductions from the profit or loss made by him. The deposit balance kept changing because of this alleged deduction. According to the user, he paid a negative balance fee from his profits and expressed shock over his unfortunate trading experience at Just Markets. For more details, check this complaint screenshot.

An Irish trader complained about the failure to open trades with a leverage offered as high as 1:3000 on the Just Markets login. However, as the trader managed to open trades, he was reportedly 200 pips away from his position, leading to an alleged liquidation. Shocked over the trade manipulation and login issues, the trader shared it all in this sharp Just Markets review.

A user from Pakistan claimed a poor Just Markets withdrawal management experience while sharing a review online. According to the allegation, the user claimed that the broker cancelled a withdrawal amount worth $2,700 on grounds of suspicious trading activities. The traders account was reportedly reset to zero. The user counteracted by claiming that all of his trades were normal and sought an explanation from the broker about the problems it noticed. However, the trader stated that the brokerage firm failed to respond to any of his queries. Worried by the overall experience, the user did not hesitate to share this negative Just Markets review.

A user from Nigeria explained that while picking a successful trader with seven trades, he could only find two trades on the Just Markets login dashboard. Explaining the situation further, the trader refused to accept that his account was low on balance or was on hold. Expecting a quick reflection of all his trades and an updated trading account balance, the user made this complaint official. Have a look.

A user from Jordan alleged that Just Markets kept his trading account under restriction for more than 50 days without reaching a resolution. According to the complaint, the broker informed him on June 19, 2026, that the account had been permanently closed and that more than $57,516 in Introducing Broker (IB) commissions, along with a $10,000 loyalty gift, had been deducted to compensate for what the company described as its own losses.
The complainant further claimed that, two days after the account closure, the broker's Verification Department requested additional AML/KYC documents, including another liveness check through an external link rather than within the broker's application. The user questioned why enhanced due diligence was requested after the account had already been permanently closed and views the timing as an attempt to create a compliance record after the fact.
The trader stated to have anyway completed all requested verification steps and submitted documents to demonstrate the legitimacy of his source of funds. The user argued that this left the broker with no regulatory basis to continue withholding his funds or commissions. The complaint concludes by expressing frustration over what the user describes as contradictory communication and indicates that they intend to continue updating their public review based on future interactions with the broker.
This extensive complaint below shares massive insights into the alleged problems faced by the user.

The fund loss, withdrawal denial, and trade manipulation complaints do not reportedly put Just Markets in the right spot. While the broker claims to have multiple regulations from authorities such as the Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CYSEC), the independent investigation carried out by WikiFX, a renowned forex broker regulation inquiry tool, did not find any license for the broker. Considering elevated investment risks in the face of zero Just Markets regulation status and a spate of user complaints questioning the broker for fund-related issues, WikiFX recommends that you search for a credible brokerage firm with strict regulations and least to zero complaints. The broker thus receives a poor score of 1.25 out of 10.
Download the WikiFX app for the latest forex updates, including in-depth broker investigation reports.

Interesting Articles for You
Can Prove You Wrong!
A fresh Pune police probe has reportedly booked 57 people in connection with an alleged forex investment scam involving a trading platform. This India-focused report separates the allegation from confirmed regulatory rules, explains how fake trading app scams use social media, fabricated profits, third-party bank accounts and blocked withdrawals, and shows how investors can verify an online forex trading platform through RBI and SEBI resources. It also places the case within Pune's wider pattern of online investment fraud and provides an immediate response checklist, including the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and helpline 1930.

A TickTrader white label can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the TickTrader platform is, where a Soft-FX broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server licence, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks TickTrader cost beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a Soft-FX TickTrader provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.

eToro, a United Kingdom-based brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations concerning the basic facility a trader expects - Fund Withdrawal. Users worldwide are complaining about the lack of a withdrawal option, account restriction, and lack of customer support in real time. Many of their complaints appeared on credible broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this eToro review, we have examined these complaints.

A Fortex white label can look like the fastest route to a modern branded trading environment, but a fast launch is not the same as a controlled launch. This 2026 broker guide explains what the Fortex platform is, where a Fortex broker solution can sit in a wider operating stack, and how to evaluate the difference between a white label, a server licence, and a connected CRM or Client Office setup. It also unpacks Fortex cost beyond the monthly headline, including implementation, integration, support, data, governance, migration, and exit assumptions. Use the practical questions, workflow tests, comparison table, and launch checklist to assess a Fortex provider without mistaking a feature demo for evidence that your brokerage can run the service safely at scale.