Home -
FXRHS -

Score

1.58 /10
Danger

FXRHS

New Zealand

5-10 years

Suspicious Regulatory License

Suspicious Scope of Business

Suspicious Overrun

High potential risk

--

Add brokers

Comparison

Quantity 2

Exposure

Open Account
Website

Score

Regulatory Index0.00

Business Index7.57

Risk Management Index0.00

Software Index4.00

License Index0.00

Open Account
Website

Licenses

VPS Standard
No restriction on the broker account. Support service provided by WikiFX

Single Core

1G

40G

open now

Broker Information

More

Company Name

FXRHS

Company Abbreviation

FXRHS

Platform registered country and region

New Zealand

Company website

Pyramid scheme complaint

Expose

Check whenever you want

Download App for complete information

Warning: Low score, please stay away! 3
Previous Detection : 2025-01-22
  • It has been verified that this broker currently has no valid regulation. Please be aware of the risk!
  • The number of this brokers's negative field survey reviews has reached 1. Please be aware of the risk and the potential scam!

New Zealand broker FXRHS not found according to provided address

A field investigation according to the address shown in its regulation details did not find FXRHS’s office. The company claims to hold a Financial Services Provider license from the New Zealand FSPR, but a check with the regulator shows that the registration and license details appear to belong to another entity.

Danger New Zealand

WikiFX Verification

Exposure

2 pieces of exposure in total
Pyramid scheme complaint
Expose

User Reviews

More

User comment

1

Comments

Write a review

自由人1555
more than one year
As soon as the company's website is opened, it shows an error... I saw in the field investigation section of wikifx that the address it claims in New Zealand has no office at all.
As soon as the company's website is opened, it shows an error... I saw in the field investigation section of wikifx that the address it claims in New Zealand has no office at all.
Translate to English
2022-12-08 10:15
Reply
0
0
2