Abstract:FxOnUs was registered in 2015 in Marshall Isles. It supports MT5, and offers trading services on forex, commodities, and indices. However, this company is not regulated, and its website is inaccessible now.
Note: FxOnUs's official website https://fxonus.com/ is currently inaccessible normally.
| FxOnUsReview Summary | |
| Founded | 2015 |
| Registered Country/Region | Marshall Isles |
| Regulation | No regulation |
| Market Instruments | Forex, commodities, indices |
| Demo Account | ❌ |
| Leverage | Up to 1:500 |
| Spread | From 1.1 pips (Standard zero-bonus account) |
| Trading Platform | MT5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 |
| Customer Support | Phone: +44-2031501511 |
| Email: fxonus@fxonus.com | |
FxOnUs was registered in 2015 in Marshall Isles. It supports MT5, and offers trading services on forex, commodities, and indices. However, this company is not regulated, and its website is inaccessible now.
| Pros | Cons |
| MT5 supported | Lack of regulation |
| Unavailable website |

FxOnUs is not regulated by the financial services regulatory authority in Marshal Isles, which means that the company lacks regulation from its registration site. Moreover, the current status shows that activities like transferring and updating are prohibited.


FxOnUs claims to offer products like forex, commodities, and indices.
| Tradable Instruments | Supported |
| Forex | ✔ |
| Commodities | ✔ |
| Indices | ✔ |
| Stocks | ❌ |
| Cryptocurrencies | ❌ |
| Bonds | ❌ |
| Options | ❌ |
| Mutual Funds | ❌ |
FxOnUs offers various account types including a Standard zero-bonus option for cautious traders (minimum $100 deposit advertised). They also have a Standard account with a 50% bonus, but be wary of such offers from unregulated brokers. Finally, an ECN account is advertised, but without regulatory oversight, its legitimacy is questionable.
On FxOnUs, the leverage can be up to 1:500. When the leverage is high, potential risks may also be high. Therefore, careful considerations are needed.
FxOnUs provides different spreads and commissions across its three account types.
The Standard zero-bonus account offers spreads from 1.1 pips with no commission.
In contrast, the 50% bonus Standard account features spreads starting at 2.5 pips.
The ECN account boasts spreads as low as 0.2 pips and incurs a commission of USD 10 per lot.
The broker does not impose any additional trading-related fees.
FxOnUs uses MT5 as its trading platform.

The options for deposit and withdrawal are the same, and it is free to withdraw if the amount is bigger than $100. However, when the amount is less than $100, $20 should be charged for withdrawal.
| Payment Option | WithdrawalFee | Processing Time |
| Cards, wire transfers | $20 if less than $100; free if bigger than $100 | 1 - 5 days |

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework