Abstract:City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.

City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.
According to the inquiry, CIFHKL neglected to perform due research on the customer-supplied systems (CSSs) that 16 customers used to place orders. As a result, CIFHKL was unable to effectively assess and handle the dangers of money laundering and terrorism funding (ML/TF) posed by the use of such CSSs by its customers.

The SFC also found that the sums deposited into two client accounts did not match the stated financial characteristics of those clients. Although CIFHKL asserted that it monitored client account money moves on a daily basis and was aware of the sizeable deposits in the two client accounts, it was unable to demonstrate that it had properly investigated the deposits and adequately handled the related ML/TF risks.
The SFC discovered that CIFHKL did not put in place a reliable system of continuous surveillance to identify suspect trading trends in customer accounts. The regular and numerous transactions in the two customer accounts made this clear. The same customer frequently made buy and sell orders at the same price for the products of the same future in the same second.
Because CIFHKL's systems and controls didn't successfully guarantee adherence to the AML Guideline and the Code of Conduct, the SFC found them to be insufficient and ineffectual.
The investigation's results highlight the significance of strong AML/CFT controls for banking organizations. Inadequate due diligence and tracking procedures can have serious legal repercussions for businesses as well as harm their reputations.
The instance of CIFHKL further emphasizes the necessity for businesses to keep efficient controls to recognize and reduce ML/TF risks. The goal of customer due diligence and continuous tracking should be to spot odd or suspect behavior as well as transactions that could be an indication of ML/TF activity.
Banking organizations should use the right technological tools to effectively watch the activities of their customers. Such technology can help identify activities that may be a sign of ML/TF threats, enabling businesses to respond appropriately and quickly.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html?source=fma3


Globinok, a Comoros-based new-age trading enterprise, is receiving bad reviews from users across India, in particular. These users have accused the brokerage firm of failing to deliver on their trading promise. This included failing to ensure the AI-based trading experience promised by them. The sudden disappearance of the account manager has been another key complaint highlighted by users. In this Globinok review article, we have shared user reviews and a regulatory overview of the broker.

As AI coding tools spread, a thought is surfacing in more and more traders’ minds: since writing code is now this easy, can I build a few forex EAs myself and let the program trade and earn money automatically? The idea is not naive - automation is genuinely a real and valuable direction in trading. But before you invest your time, several key questions must be thought through first: what do those "profitable EAs" on the market actually rely on? What does a system that truly survives long-term look like? How much can AI help here, and how much can it not? (An EA, or Expert Advisor, is a program that can automatically execute a trading strategy.)

Did PocketOption block your trading account while it still had funds? Did the forex broker cancel the profits made on your investments? Have you witnessed trading losses due to trade manipulation? Did your deposit fail to show up on the PocketOption login? These are some reported user allegations against the brokerage entity. These allegations hint at a potential operational glitch at the broker’s end. To ensure an informed financial decision, we have conducted an extensive PocketOption review sharing user allegations and a regulatory oversight the broker is under.

If you open a random forex beginner’s trading platform, the screen will almost certainly show just one chart: EURUSD (the euro against the US dollar). It is nearly everyone’s default starting point - the most heavily traded pair in the world, with tight spreads and endless tutorials. Choosing it as your first pair is not a mistake. But the surprising part comes from a different scene. When you ask a group of traders who have actually traded for several years - and survived - which pairs they trade, you get answers that differ wildly. Some watch only 4 pairs, with a list that does not change for years. Others track 27 or 28, fitting nearly every major and cross pair into their system.