Abstract:City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.

City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.
According to the inquiry, CIFHKL neglected to perform due research on the customer-supplied systems (CSSs) that 16 customers used to place orders. As a result, CIFHKL was unable to effectively assess and handle the dangers of money laundering and terrorism funding (ML/TF) posed by the use of such CSSs by its customers.

The SFC also found that the sums deposited into two client accounts did not match the stated financial characteristics of those clients. Although CIFHKL asserted that it monitored client account money moves on a daily basis and was aware of the sizeable deposits in the two client accounts, it was unable to demonstrate that it had properly investigated the deposits and adequately handled the related ML/TF risks.
The SFC discovered that CIFHKL did not put in place a reliable system of continuous surveillance to identify suspect trading trends in customer accounts. The regular and numerous transactions in the two customer accounts made this clear. The same customer frequently made buy and sell orders at the same price for the products of the same future in the same second.
Because CIFHKL's systems and controls didn't successfully guarantee adherence to the AML Guideline and the Code of Conduct, the SFC found them to be insufficient and ineffectual.
The investigation's results highlight the significance of strong AML/CFT controls for banking organizations. Inadequate due diligence and tracking procedures can have serious legal repercussions for businesses as well as harm their reputations.
The instance of CIFHKL further emphasizes the necessity for businesses to keep efficient controls to recognize and reduce ML/TF risks. The goal of customer due diligence and continuous tracking should be to spot odd or suspect behavior as well as transactions that could be an indication of ML/TF activity.
Banking organizations should use the right technological tools to effectively watch the activities of their customers. Such technology can help identify activities that may be a sign of ML/TF threats, enabling businesses to respond appropriately and quickly.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html?source=fma3


Forex traders often wonder why the same currency pair, for instance, EUR/USD, shows 1.17450 on one broker but 1.17455 on another. This difference creates suspicion among traders, often leading to wrong calls and losses. Calm your nerves first by understanding that small price variations are normal and are a reflection of the global forex market’s operation. The forex market is decentralized with no single exchange or official price for any currency pair. That is some revelation for new forex traders. So, what’s the methodology for price determination? It is derived from an expanded network of financial institutions, banks, liquidity providers and brokers globally. So, as a forex trader, you must understand the price structure thoroughly to stay out of unnecessary chaos and continue to reap rewards.

Whether it’s South Asia, Western Asia, Europe or America, users all over are basically asking this: Why is VITTAVERSE cancelling my profits without providing any evidence? While they may be user allegations, a large volume of such complaints creates suspicion, if not affirmation, about the broker’s alleged involvement in profit cancellations. Users also complained about massive withdrawal delays in the name of ‘Account Review’ or ‘Account Upgrade’. This VITTAVERSE review article closely examines user allegations, including those concerning profit deletions, by the Seychelles-based brokerage firm. To give you a fair idea of its legitimacy, we have also provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

This NinjaTrader review provides a detailed examination of NinjaTrader regulation, licensing coverage, the NinjaTrader broker profile, and overall standing based on information available on WikiFX.

This GRD review provides a detailed examination of the GRD broker, its regulatory framework, licensing coverage, GRD regulation, and overall standing based on information available on WikiFX.