Abstract:City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.

City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.
According to the inquiry, CIFHKL neglected to perform due research on the customer-supplied systems (CSSs) that 16 customers used to place orders. As a result, CIFHKL was unable to effectively assess and handle the dangers of money laundering and terrorism funding (ML/TF) posed by the use of such CSSs by its customers.

The SFC also found that the sums deposited into two client accounts did not match the stated financial characteristics of those clients. Although CIFHKL asserted that it monitored client account money moves on a daily basis and was aware of the sizeable deposits in the two client accounts, it was unable to demonstrate that it had properly investigated the deposits and adequately handled the related ML/TF risks.
The SFC discovered that CIFHKL did not put in place a reliable system of continuous surveillance to identify suspect trading trends in customer accounts. The regular and numerous transactions in the two customer accounts made this clear. The same customer frequently made buy and sell orders at the same price for the products of the same future in the same second.
Because CIFHKL's systems and controls didn't successfully guarantee adherence to the AML Guideline and the Code of Conduct, the SFC found them to be insufficient and ineffectual.
The investigation's results highlight the significance of strong AML/CFT controls for banking organizations. Inadequate due diligence and tracking procedures can have serious legal repercussions for businesses as well as harm their reputations.
The instance of CIFHKL further emphasizes the necessity for businesses to keep efficient controls to recognize and reduce ML/TF risks. The goal of customer due diligence and continuous tracking should be to spot odd or suspect behavior as well as transactions that could be an indication of ML/TF activity.
Banking organizations should use the right technological tools to effectively watch the activities of their customers. Such technology can help identify activities that may be a sign of ML/TF threats, enabling businesses to respond appropriately and quickly.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html?source=fma3


Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!