Abstract:City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.

City International Futures (Hong Kong) Limited (CIFHKL), formerly known as VERCAP Financial Services Limited, was reprimanded and fined $100,000 by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and other regulatory requirements between March 2016 and October 2018.
According to the inquiry, CIFHKL neglected to perform due research on the customer-supplied systems (CSSs) that 16 customers used to place orders. As a result, CIFHKL was unable to effectively assess and handle the dangers of money laundering and terrorism funding (ML/TF) posed by the use of such CSSs by its customers.

The SFC also found that the sums deposited into two client accounts did not match the stated financial characteristics of those clients. Although CIFHKL asserted that it monitored client account money moves on a daily basis and was aware of the sizeable deposits in the two client accounts, it was unable to demonstrate that it had properly investigated the deposits and adequately handled the related ML/TF risks.
The SFC discovered that CIFHKL did not put in place a reliable system of continuous surveillance to identify suspect trading trends in customer accounts. The regular and numerous transactions in the two customer accounts made this clear. The same customer frequently made buy and sell orders at the same price for the products of the same future in the same second.
Because CIFHKL's systems and controls didn't successfully guarantee adherence to the AML Guideline and the Code of Conduct, the SFC found them to be insufficient and ineffectual.
The investigation's results highlight the significance of strong AML/CFT controls for banking organizations. Inadequate due diligence and tracking procedures can have serious legal repercussions for businesses as well as harm their reputations.
The instance of CIFHKL further emphasizes the necessity for businesses to keep efficient controls to recognize and reduce ML/TF risks. The goal of customer due diligence and continuous tracking should be to spot odd or suspect behavior as well as transactions that could be an indication of ML/TF activity.
Banking organizations should use the right technological tools to effectively watch the activities of their customers. Such technology can help identify activities that may be a sign of ML/TF threats, enabling businesses to respond appropriately and quickly.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html?source=fma3


Has AssetsFX stolen your deposits when seeking withdrawals from the trading platform? Did the broker fail to give any reason for initiating this? Did you notice fake trades in your forex trading account? Does the Mauritius-based forex broker deny you withdrawals by claiming trading abuse on your part? Did you also receive assistance from the AssetsFX customer support team? Firstly, these are not unusual here. Many traders have shared negative AssetsFX reviews online. In this article, we have highlighted such reviews so that you can make the right investment call. Take a look!

Traders looking for unbiased information about ROCK-WEST often find mixed messages. The broker offers some appealing features: you can start with just $50, use the popular MetaTrader 5 trading platform, and get very high leverage. These features are meant to attract both new and experienced traders who want easy access to potentially profitable trading. However, as you look deeper, there are serious problems. The good features are overshadowed by the broker's weak regulation and many serious complaints from users, especially about not being able to withdraw their capital. This complete 2025 ROCK-WEST Review will examine every important aspect of how it works—from regulation and trading rules to real user experiences—to give traders clear, fact-based information for making smart decisions.

When you search for terms like "Is LTI Safe or Scam," you are asking the most important question any investor can ask. Picking a broker is not just about fees or trading platforms; it is about trust. You are giving the broker your hard-earned capital, expecting it to handle it honestly and professionally. The internet is full of mixed user reviews, promotional content, and confusing claims, making it hard to find a clear answer. This article is designed to cut through that confusion.

When choosing a forex broker, the most important question is always about regulation. For traders looking into the London Trading Index (LTI), the issue of LTI Regulation is not simple. In fact, there are conflicting claims, official warnings, and major red flags. According to data from global regulatory tracking platforms, LTI operates without proper regulation from any top-level financial authority. The main problem comes from the difference between what the broker claims and what can actually be verified. While LTI presents itself as a professional company based on London's financial standards, independent research shows a different story. This article will examine the claims about the LTI License, look closely at the broker's company structure, and analyze the warnings issued by financial watchdogs. Read on!