Home -

Main body -

WikiFX Express

Earthport

WikiFX | 2026-04-20 23:28

Abstract：Established in 1999 and based in the United Kingdom, Earthport is an investment business. It was controlled by the FCA, however its position as such has changed. Through the Visa-associated handles and pages, the corporation keeps a presence on several social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn and offers customer service via email at support@earthport.com.

Note:Earthport's official website:https://www.visa.co.uk/run-your-business/visa-direct.html is currently inaccessible normally.

Aspect	Information
Company Name	Earthport
Registered Country/Area	United Kingdom
Founded Year	1999
Regulation	FCA(Exceeded)
Customer Support	Email:support@earthport.comSocal media:Twitterhttps://twitter.com/earthportFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/VisaUnitedStates Instagram: https://instagram.com/visauk/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/visa

Earthport Information

Established in 1999 and based in the United Kingdom, Earthport is an investment business. It was controlled by the FCA, however its position as such has changed. Through the Visa-associated handles and pages, the corporation keeps a presence on several social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn and offers customer service via email at support@earthport.com.

Is Earthport Legit or a Scam？

	Financial Conduct Authority(FCA)
Current Status	Exceeded
Regulated by	FCA
License Type	Payment License
License No.	537580
Licensed Institution	Visa Payments Limited

Downsides of Earthport

Earthport crosses the regulated business of the FCA (licence number: 537550), but it exceeds. This therefore begs issues of dependability and compliance.

Field studies suggest that Earthport does not really have a UK office. This challenges the company's true presence and openness, therefore encouraging mistrust.

Investors run a big risk since the company runs outside of its regulatory authority and without a physical office. This suggests that corporate operations could not be completely legal or safe.

Conclusion

Founded in 1999, Earthport is a UK-based investment firm that runs outside of FCA control and does not have a physical presence, so generating questions regarding its compliance and openness. Earthport is risky; consumers should trade under public knowledge using controlled brokers.

Broker Dealer Learn basic forex

Related broker

Not Regulated

Earthport

Company name：Earthport PLC

Score

1.94

Website：https://www.earthport.com/

5-10 years | Questionable Regulatory License | Regional Brokers | High Potential Risk

Score

1.94

Spreadex Review: Wider Spread & Unexplained Account Closure Allegations for This 2-Decade-Old Broker

Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

Original 2026-07-29 21:01

cTrader White Label Platform: A Practical Guide for Broker Evaluation and Multi-Asset Expansion in 2

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

Original 2026-07-29 17:36

Is TradingPRO Safe? FCA Warning, Indonesia Blocklist Evidence, and 7 Checks Before You Deposit

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.

Original 2026-07-24 18:49

MT4 White Label Cost in 2026: What Brokers Must Budget Beyond the Platform Fee

The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.

Industry 2026-07-23 21:38