FINRA Fines Investment Network and CEO for Misconduct in Pre-IPO Offerings

WikiFX

| 2024-10-19 08:00

Abstract：The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.

Deceptive Business Practices

INI misled investors about its compensation structure, falsely claiming it would only receive a 10% sales commission for its involvement in the private placement offerings. However, INI had secretly agreed to an additional 5% in selling compensation and half of the carried interest from the offerings. This hidden compensation agreement, which was never disclosed to investors, constituted a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 and Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Failure to Meet Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) Requirements

INI also willfully violated Reg BI by failing to meet the standards set forth in its Disclosure and Care Obligations. The firm did not ensure that the offerings were in the best interests of its customers, failing to confirm the existence of pre-IPO shares and the reasonableness of the issuers prices. This negligence violated Exchange Act Rule 15l-1 and FINRA Rule 2010.

Lack of Due Diligence and Supervision

In addition to the deceptive practices, INI failed to establish a reasonable supervisory system to ensure compliance with regulatory obligations. INI and its CEO did not enforce proper written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for private placement offerings. This led to further violations of Reg BIs Compliance Obligation and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.

Customer Identification and Filing Failures

INIs violations extended to failures under the Bank Secrecy Act, as the firm lacked an adequate Customer Identification Program (CIP) when opening accounts for the offerings. Furthermore, the company failed to file necessary documentation with FINRA, violating FINRA Rules 3310(b), 5123, and 2010.

Conclusion

FINRAs action against Investment Network and Gary L. Arnold underscores the importance of transparency, due diligence, and adherence to regulatory standards in the financial industry. By failing to disclose compensation agreements, conduct proper due diligence, and establish a supervisory system, INI and its CEO breached their obligations to both investors and regulators, leading to substantial fines and penalties. These violations serve as a reminder that firms must prioritize the best interests of their clients and maintain strong compliance programs to avoid legal and regulatory consequences.

Forex trading Forex news

SupremeFX Exposure: Do Traders Face Profit Deletions & Withdrawal Denials?

Is your SupremeFX trading experience mired with illegitimate profit deletions? Did the broker fail to return back your profits despite putting numerous pieces of evidence supporting fair trading on your end? Failed to receive withdrawals even after waiting for a long time? These are some reported concerns on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. We, through this SupremeFX review article, have endeavored to make it a transparent broker evaluation experience for you. Read on!

Original 2026-04-15 22:52

Long Asia Review: Is This Broker Safe or a Risk for Traders?

Long Asia, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based brokerage entity, continues to grab headlines, with users sharing varied reviews about their trading experience with the company. While some report negative experiences such as withdrawal denials and fund losses, others praise its various account types and low minimum deposit requirements. In this Long Asia review article, we have collected a list of both positive and negative experiences to figure out whether it’s suitable for your trading. Read on to find out.

Original 2026-04-15 21:00

Trader's Way Legitimacy Check: Is This a Fake Broker or a Legitimate Trading Partner?

When looking into a forex broker, the most important question is always about safety. For many traders asking, "Is Trader's Way legit?" The answer needs careful research based on facts. The most important finding from our research is that Trader's Way works as a broker without proper oversight. This fact alone is a major worry for any trader, no matter how much experience it has. Making this problem worse is the fact that official financial watchdogs have warned against them, and many users have made serious complaints that question whether the broker is honest and raise the possibility of it being a Trader's Way scam. While the broker's website may show attractive features such as high leverage and low minimum deposits, this article will examine the available information. We will look past marketing claims to give you a clear, fact-based view, helping you make a truly informed decision about whether this is a partner you can trust with your funds.

Original 2026-04-15 14:55

WM Markets Exposure: Reports of High Slippage & Withdrawal Issues

Have you witnessed poor trade order execution on the WM Markets platform? Does the platform cause you losses due to heavy slippage? Did the Comoros-based forex broker deny you fund withdrawals? On top of all, was the customer support experience far from desired? These allegations have arguably broken the traders’ trust over this brokerage entity with over two years of operation. If these issues resonate with you, you must read this in-depth WM Markets review.

Original 2026-04-14 21:44