Abstract:The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.
Deceptive Business Practices
INI misled investors about its compensation structure, falsely claiming it would only receive a 10% sales commission for its involvement in the private placement offerings. However, INI had secretly agreed to an additional 5% in selling compensation and half of the carried interest from the offerings. This hidden compensation agreement, which was never disclosed to investors, constituted a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 and Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Failure to Meet Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) Requirements
INI also willfully violated Reg BI by failing to meet the standards set forth in its Disclosure and Care Obligations. The firm did not ensure that the offerings were in the best interests of its customers, failing to confirm the existence of pre-IPO shares and the reasonableness of the issuers prices. This negligence violated Exchange Act Rule 15l-1 and FINRA Rule 2010.
Lack of Due Diligence and Supervision
In addition to the deceptive practices, INI failed to establish a reasonable supervisory system to ensure compliance with regulatory obligations. INI and its CEO did not enforce proper written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for private placement offerings. This led to further violations of Reg BIs Compliance Obligation and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.
Customer Identification and Filing Failures
INIs violations extended to failures under the Bank Secrecy Act, as the firm lacked an adequate Customer Identification Program (CIP) when opening accounts for the offerings. Furthermore, the company failed to file necessary documentation with FINRA, violating FINRA Rules 3310(b), 5123, and 2010.
Conclusion
FINRAs action against Investment Network and Gary L. Arnold underscores the importance of transparency, due diligence, and adherence to regulatory standards in the financial industry. By failing to disclose compensation agreements, conduct proper due diligence, and establish a supervisory system, INI and its CEO breached their obligations to both investors and regulators, leading to substantial fines and penalties. These violations serve as a reminder that firms must prioritize the best interests of their clients and maintain strong compliance programs to avoid legal and regulatory consequences.


Fidelity Investments has been grabbing attention of late for negative reasons. These include complaints concerning withdrawals, account closure without notice, technical glitches in trade order processing, and inept customer support service. As the complaints continue to grow, we prepared a Fidelity review article showcasing some of them. Read on as we share details.

Does ICE FX ask you to pay taxes for fund withdrawal access? Were you made to pay a hefty fee on a verification failure? Does the broker deliberately cancel your profitable trades? Have you failed to receive assistance from the ICE FX customer support team on your fund deposit and withdrawal queries? These issues have become common for its traders. Many of them have highlighted these issues online. In this ICE FX review article, we have investigated some of their complaints. Read on as we dive deep.

When choosing a financial services company, the most important question is about its regulatory status. For traders looking at NEWTON GLOBAL, this question is extremely important. A basic investigation using third-party verification platforms shows a worrying picture: The broker is marked for having no valid regulation. This article provides a detailed, fact-based analysis of NEWTON GLOBAL's regulatory claims, company registration, and the major risks with how it operates. We will examine the data provided by global broker inquiry apps and public records to present a clear and objective report. For any trader, an important first step before investing in any broker is to do a basic check on such a platform. This simple action can be the most important part of your research process.

When you come across a broker, such as NEWTON GLOBAL, your main concern is simple: Can you trust it for investments? The search for "Is NEWTON GLOBAL Legit" comes from needing a clear, fact-based answer to protect your capital. We understand this urgency. Read on as we answer this query.