Abstract:The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed significant fines on Investment Network, Inc. (INI) and its CEO, Gary L. Arnold, for a series of regulatory violations connected to the sale of pre-initial public offering (pre-IPO) funds between October 2020 and May 2021.
Deceptive Business Practices
INI misled investors about its compensation structure, falsely claiming it would only receive a 10% sales commission for its involvement in the private placement offerings. However, INI had secretly agreed to an additional 5% in selling compensation and half of the carried interest from the offerings. This hidden compensation agreement, which was never disclosed to investors, constituted a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 and Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Failure to Meet Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) Requirements
INI also willfully violated Reg BI by failing to meet the standards set forth in its Disclosure and Care Obligations. The firm did not ensure that the offerings were in the best interests of its customers, failing to confirm the existence of pre-IPO shares and the reasonableness of the issuers prices. This negligence violated Exchange Act Rule 15l-1 and FINRA Rule 2010.
Lack of Due Diligence and Supervision
In addition to the deceptive practices, INI failed to establish a reasonable supervisory system to ensure compliance with regulatory obligations. INI and its CEO did not enforce proper written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for private placement offerings. This led to further violations of Reg BIs Compliance Obligation and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.
Customer Identification and Filing Failures
INIs violations extended to failures under the Bank Secrecy Act, as the firm lacked an adequate Customer Identification Program (CIP) when opening accounts for the offerings. Furthermore, the company failed to file necessary documentation with FINRA, violating FINRA Rules 3310(b), 5123, and 2010.
Conclusion
FINRAs action against Investment Network and Gary L. Arnold underscores the importance of transparency, due diligence, and adherence to regulatory standards in the financial industry. By failing to disclose compensation agreements, conduct proper due diligence, and establish a supervisory system, INI and its CEO breached their obligations to both investors and regulators, leading to substantial fines and penalties. These violations serve as a reminder that firms must prioritize the best interests of their clients and maintain strong compliance programs to avoid legal and regulatory consequences.


Did your good trading experience with TAG MARKETS reverse when applied for fund withdrawals at the Mauritius-based forex broker? Besides withdrawal denials, did you also witness account blocks or deletions by the broker? Did the broker’s customer support team fail to provide you a proper reason for these trading activities? Have you also witnessed glitches on deposit bonus? These allegations have only grown further in 2026. Read on as we share these allegations in this TAG MARKETS review article.

Is your trading experience with MYFX markets full of fund withdrawal denials despite repeated communications with its customer support team? Has the broker deleted all your profits? Did the broker accuse you of false trading strategy implementation while deleting your profits? There have been many such instances reported by traders against these activities online. In this MYFX Markets review article, we have shared some complaints. Take a look!

Exfor, a Malaysia-based forex broker, has allegedly been the centre of attention for all the wrong reasons. These include long-pending withdrawal denials, no communication or assistance from the broker’s customer support team, manipulated pricing upon a withdrawal request by the trader, and account blowups due to bonus-related issues. It’s the traders who allegedly bear the brunt of all these suspicious trading activities. A lot of them have criticized it on broker review platforms. We have highlighted some of their complaints in this Exfor review article. Take a look!

When choosing a broker, the most important question is: "Is my broker properly regulated and is my capital safe?" For Xlibre, the answer is straightforward but worrying. Based on detailed research from independent global regulatory checking platforms, Xlibre is not regulated by any major financial authority. This article looks at the main issues around Xlibre Regulation status, or more correctly, the lack of it. We will examine the truth behind the claimed Xlibre License and explain why its business setup has high-risk warning signs such as a "Suspicious Regulatory License" and very low trust scores from auditors. The goal of this research is to give a clear, fact-based analysis of Xlibre's company registration, its claims, and the real risks these create for traders' capital. While this article provides a detailed analysis, regulations can change. Traders should always check the most current information before working with any broker. You can find the detailed verification report for