Abstract:A former finance officer in Malaysia lost RM450,000 in savings after being deceived by an investment scheme advertised on social media.

A former finance officer in Malaysia lost RM450,000 in savings after being deceived by an investment scheme advertised on social media. The 40-year-old man, known only as Ken Wong, shared how an online ad promising high returns led him into a fraudulent scheme that ultimately left him financially devastated.
Drawn by the prospect of lucrative profits, Wong, an investor with nearly a decade of experience, admitted that despite his background, his judgment was clouded by the appeal of quick gains. The advertisement led him to click a link that connected him to an online chatroom, where he was offered guidance and assurance on how to profit through investments.
Wong explained that after entering the chatroom, he was encouraged to make an initial investment through an online platform. To build trust, the platform permitted him to withdraw a dividend of around RM5,000. He noted that his account appeared to show promising returns, yet he was unable to withdraw the accumulated profits. Instead, he said, he was pressured to invest an additional RM1.5 million in an initial public offering (IPO) for a foreign company. It was at this point, he explained, that he realized he had fallen victim to a scam.

Between July and August, Wong reported making 23 separate money transfers into four accounts held by private companies. After finally recognizing the schemes fraudulent nature, he filed a police report in August in an effort to recover his losses.
In response to this case, Joseph Prakash, founder of the Pertubuhan Kebajikan Integriti Persahabatan Nasional (PKIPN), highlighted the growing issue of financial scams targeting the public. Prakash called for stricter oversight and enforcement against such fraudulent activities, including tighter controls on investment advertisements across social media platforms, which are frequently exploited to attract unsuspecting victims.
Prakash further noted that some victims of these scams are retirees who have reported their cases to the authorities, providing documentation and evidence of the fraud. He disclosed that PKIPN has received over 10 complaints linked to similar investment schemes, representing collective losses exceeding RM3 million.


Binany, a United Kingdom-based forex broker, has been accused of severe trading misconduct by users worldwide. These include the usual withdrawal denial problems, accompanied by the contradictory move from the broker when processing deposits and withdrawals, deposit credit failures, and poor customer service, etc. Annoyed by these undesirable experiences, many traders have gone online and expressed their frustration. In this Binany review article, we have reviewed these complaints thoroughly and shared our overall analysis about the brokerage firm. Read on!

FOREX.com presents a troubling paradox that should give traders serious pause before committing their capital. Despite accumulating 218 reviews and showcasing notable strengths like responsive customer support, a user-friendly interface, and fast execution with low latency, the broker ultimately earns a "Not Recommended" status with a middling 6.5 out of 10 rating. While 154 positive reviews might initially seem encouraging, the concerning 19.7% negative rate reveals systemic issues that overshadow any technical advantages. The most alarming problems reported by traders center on fund safety issues, withdrawal delays and rejections, and support teams that are slow to respond with no meaningful solutions—a stark contradiction to claims of responsive service.

E*TRADE presents a troubling paradox in the forex brokerage landscape, earning a concerning overall rating of just 2.3 out of 10 based on 207 trader reviews and carrying a "Use with Caution" designation. While the platform maintains certain foundational strengths, including a good reputation for safety, responsive customer support infrastructure, and a user-friendly interface that appeals to both novice and experienced traders, these positives are dramatically overshadowed by severe operational deficiencies. The sentiment distribution reveals an alarming reality: 93.2% of reviews are negative, with only 7 positive and 7 neutral assessments among the total feedback collected.

When choosing a forex broker, safety is always the most important question. Traders often ask, "Is AXIORY Safe or Scam?". This review takes a close look at AXIORY's business practices, government oversight, and what users are saying about them. We're using information only from WikiFX, a worldwide platform that checks broker regulations. Our goal is to give you clear, fact-based information to help you make a smart choice.