Abstract:Failed to withdraw funds from the Plus500 platform? Does the Israel-based forex broker give many excuses to deny withdrawals, such as imposing the minimum withdrawal amount restriction? Does the broker’s app fail constantly during the trading hours? These allegations have reportedly taken vicious shape on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Plus500 review article, we have examined these allegations. Let’s begin!

Failed to withdraw funds from the Plus500 platform? Does the Israel-based forex broker give many excuses to deny withdrawals, such as imposing the minimum withdrawal amount restriction? Does the broker‘s app fail constantly during the trading hours? These allegations have reportedly taken vicious shape on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Plus500 review article, we have examined these allegations. Let’s begin!
Plus500 is a full-fledged brokerage entity offering trading opportunities across numerous CFDs, such as forex. It claims to have a presence across 65 countries globally with over 15 licenses from reputable authorities such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Cyprus Securities & Exchange Commission (CySec), and the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC).
A user from Belgium reported facing issues when attempting to withdraw his USDT funds after his country became unsupported on the platform.
Key Issue:
Explanation:
This suggests a possible issue, such as:
Here is the Plus500 review shared by the trader.

A United States-based trader complained about Plus500 denying her from either withdrawing or spending funds that totaled £280. The user reportedly wrote two statements to which she allegedly did not receive any response despite passing the verification check. Check out the complaint screenshot to know more.

A user from Hong Kong reported having faced withdrawal denials despite submitting the salary slips and transaction records as asked by Plus500. Understandably, the trader got frustrated with this and shared a negative review of the broker.

A Taiwan-based user reported difficulties when applying for a withdrawal amount of more than $10,000. Recounting his story, the trader shared that Plus500 allegedly told him to pay a fee. The user made the Plus500 review public, containing several screenshots.

A user from the United Arab Emirates reported a heavy loss of 40000 AED on the Plus500 platform following the AI-based market analysis. The trader criticized it by saying the AI-based news trading always proved wrong as the price moved in the direction opposite to the estimate. Perceiving all this as misleading, the user urged others not to follow its AI news signals blindly. Look below to find a long complaint containing extensive details regarding the massive loss suffered by the user.

A client from the United Kingdom made a serious allegation that can damage the brokers reputation. According to the user, Plus500 is good only when traders make losses. As they make significant gains, the broker allegedly closes their trading accounts without any explanation. Sharing his case, the trader reported that, while being asked for an account verification, the user shared the bank statement and all other details. Subsequently, the trader received an email notifying him of the account closure. Worryingly, the user reportedly had seven open trades, with his overall profit estimated to be over £150k, which he feared losing. The negative Plus500 review following this unexpected development was understandably apparent. Take a look at this review.

A user claimed that Plus500 engaged in unfair trading practices that resulted in consistent losses, even on trades that should have been profitable. According to the complaint, the platform shows extremely high and unrealistic spreads, sometimes allegedly reaching up to 100%, which makes it difficult for traders to maintain positions. The user stated that trades that appear to be in profit suddenly turn into losses due to these abnormal spread spikes.
According to the trader, the broker also highlights a noticeable difference between demo and real accounts, where everything seems normal in demo trading but behaves unfavorably once real money is involved. Based on this experience, the user believed the system may be set up in a way that disadvantages traders by forcing them out of positions.
Overall, the complaint reflects a strong concern about pricing transparency and trading fairness, along with a warning to other users about the potential risk of losing money on the platform.
Read the complete complaint below.

As far as the regulations are concerned, Plus500 is indeed licensed by multiple authorities such as the FCA, ASIC, and CySec. Mostly, the regulatory claims made by the broker, as shown above, are true, which has been reflected in its score by the WikiFX team. It receives a healthy score of 7.99 out of 10. However, given a massive rise in complaints concerning Plus500 withdrawal problems, the broker management needs to step in and ensure a speedy resolution of the complaints. Doing so will only help boost its reputation in a dynamic forex market where positive sentiments drive business for brokers.
Want to read more exposure reports of forex brokers? Do not miss the WikiFX app. Download it today to begin your journey to an informed investment.


Every broker with a marketing budget now slaps the letters "ECN" on its homepage. Few of them actually deliver what those letters promise. For a serious trader — a scalper, a day trader, an algo trader, anyone whose edge lives or dies on execution quality — the gap between a true ECN broker and a market maker wearing an ECN costume can quietly cost you hundreds of pips a year in slippage, requotes, and inflated spreads. So we cut through the marketing, looked at the brokers that genuinely offer raw pricing and deep liquidity, and cross-checked every one of them on WikiFX. Here are the six ECN accounts that actually earn the label in 2026 — ranked. First, a short primer, because understanding ECN is what lets you judge these brokers properly.

If you have been shopping around for a forex broker and landed on FX Novus and VCG Markets, you have stumbled onto a genuinely instructive pair. On the surface they look like cousins: both are relatively young, both wave around multi-asset trading and tight spreads, and both operate from the kind of offshore corners of the world that should make any beginner slow down. But dig into the data on WikiFX and the two part ways sharply. One carries active, screaming red flags. The other is merely standing in a yellow zone. Neither is what a cautious newcomer would call "safe" — but understanding how they differ is exactly the kind of lesson that protects your money. Let's put them head to head, decode the jargon along the way, and reach an honest verdict.

There are few feelings in trading more sickening than this one: you funded your account, you walked away confident your money was safe, and when you came back to check on it, the platform calmly informed you that your login details were wrong. Not your trades — your very identity, locked out. And on the other side of that login screen sits a balance you can no longer touch and a support team that has gone silent. That is the heart of a complaint filed against New Frontier on WikiFX. One trader reported depositing 40,500 pesos, returning to log in with the exact email and password they had registered, and being told the data was "incorrect" — which, in their words, meant their earnings had simply been taken. Customer service, they said, did not react. Let's look closely at this broker, what makes its profile so unsettling, and why verification here is not optional.

Did your profits disappear just as you tried to withdraw funds from your Headway account? Have you been manipulated in the name of a forex bonus challenge by receiving a negligible sum compared to what was promised? Did you face capital losses due to abnormal spreads and slippages? Your issues resonate with others who have complained about the broker online. In this Headway review article, we have investigated these complaints while providing our firm view on the broker’s regulatory oversight.