Abstract:EC Markets has reported a record $5.13 trillion trading volume in Q1 2026, marking a 14.6% increase from the previous quarter. The broker also saw an 18.3% rise in active traders, with the majority of its trading volume now coming from non-forex assets.

EC Markets, a leading global retail broker, has reported a significant increase in trading activity for Q1 2026, with a total trading volume of $5.13 trillion. This represents a 14.6% increase compared to the previous quarter. The growth in volume, combined with a substantial rise in active client participation, has positioned the broker among the top three by trading volume globally.
The number of active traders increased by 18.3% in the first quarter of 2026, reaching 272,000 clients. On average, EC Markets saw monthly trading volumes of $1.7 trillion, with daily volumes reaching $81.4 billion. The company attributes this growth to heightened demand for multi-asset trading, which continues to dominate client preferences.
Shift Toward Multi-Asset Trading
While forex trading has traditionally been a core focus for brokers like EC Markets, the companys latest figures indicate a shift in client behavior. In Q1 2026, forex trading accounted for just 2% of the overall trading volume, with 98% of activity driven by other asset classes such as commodities, indices, and digital assets. This reflects the growing trend among traders towards more diversified portfolios, seeking exposure to a wider range of financial instruments.
This trend is also mirrored in the companys geographic expansion, with EC Markets increasing its footprint in regions like Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. The broker continues to invest in technology and regulatory compliance to meet the evolving needs of its client base.
Brand Growth Through Strategic Partnerships
In addition to its impressive trading volumes, EC Markets has been focusing on brand recognition through strategic partnerships, such as its association with Liverpool FC. These partnerships help increase visibility and attract new clients, further cementing the firms position as a competitive player in the global market.
The continued growth and diversification of its product offerings have allowed EC Markets to remain resilient in an increasingly competitive market.
Looking Ahead: Adapting to a Changing Financial Landscape
Despite strong performance in Q1 2026, the market remains dynamic, and the broker is aware of the challenges ahead. EC Markets plans to continue adapting to market changes by focusing on technological innovation, regulatory compliance, and enhancing client services to ensure ongoing growth and competitiveness.
The firm is also actively expanding its multi-asset offerings, aligning its strategies with the growing demand for diversified investment options among retail traders.
About WikiFX
WikiFX is a trusted source for detailed reviews and information about forex brokers worldwide. With a mission to help traders make informed decisions, WikiFX provides insights into broker licensing, regulatory compliance, and client feedback, ensuring transparency in the forex trading landscape.


Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.

As you look forward to reading the Saxo reviews, you come across both positive and negative user experiences concerning trading. However, what makes prospective users dwell more is the significant insight shared through negative experiences compared to positive ones. The negative experiences are more detailed around fund withdrawals and deposits. Although they are allegations, they represent a disturbing picture. For example, we came across a case where a user highlighted the inability to trade an instrument, which is actively traded in the market. We have examined the recent allegations against the brokerage firm in this in-depth review. At the same time, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework