사용자 후기
More
사용자 댓글
2
의견의견 제출
firefists
1년 이상
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company.
In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company.
In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
한국어로 번역
2023-04-03 18:37firefists
1년 이상
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia.
While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia.
While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
한국어로 번역
2023-04-03 18:37
