用戶評價
More
用戶評論
71
條評論發布評價
FX2085521854
6-12個月
客服态度不好 不解决问题 像机器人一样回答问题 速度慢
客服态度不好 不解决问题 像机器人一样回答问题 速度慢
翻譯成繁體中文
2025-12-20 10:58Legitimate and strictly regulated financial institutions typically have strict procedures when dealing with customer funds, especially when it comes to punitive measures such as fines and confiscation. Clear evidence of violations, prior notice to clients, opportunities for clients to appeal and defend themselves, and ultimately arbitration by independent third parties (such as regulatory agencies or arbitration institutions). It is highly abnormal to impose penalties solely based on internal professional team audits, lacking transparency and fairness. Confiscation "is a mandatory legal or administrative enforcement action, usually made by a court or specific regulatory agency in accordance with the law. A commercial company usually does not have the authority to" confiscate "citizens' legal property. A responsible platform should have a clear regulatory framework and appeal channels for all operations, especially those involving punishing customers. If the platform cannot provide clear terms and procedures recognized by regulatory authorities on which its actions are based, then the legality of its actions is seriously questionable. A regulated platform must have laws and regulations to follow in its behavior, rather than relying on some bullshit professional review by an internal professional team. FXTM is an extremely hypocritical and hypocritical platform, with a high score of 9.26, doing things that seriously lack supervision. It did not negotiate with customers in advance, did not display clear evidence of violations, did not give customers the opportunity to defend themselves, did not have third-party arbitration, and did not have a judgment. However, based on just one email, if you violate the rules, you can confiscate the customer's account amount and then close the account
Legitimate and strictly regulated financial institutions typically have strict procedures when dealing with customer funds, especially when it comes to punitive measures such as fines and confiscation. Clear evidence of violations, prior notice to clients, opportunities for clients to appeal and defend themselves, and ultimately arbitration by independent third parties (such as regulatory agencies or arbitration institutions). It is highly abnormal to impose penalties solely based on internal professional team audits, lacking transparency and fairness. Confiscation "is a mandatory legal or administrative enforcement action, usually made by a court or specific regulatory agency in accordance with the law. A commercial company usually does not have the authority to" confiscate "citizens' legal property. A responsible platform should have a clear regulatory framework and appeal channels for all operations, especially those involving punishing customers. If the platform cannot provide clear terms and procedures recognized by regulatory authorities on which its actions are based, then the legality of its actions is seriously questionable. A regulated platform must have laws and regulations to follow in its behavior, rather than relying on some bullshit professional review by an internal professional team. FXTM is an extremely hypocritical and hypocritical platform, with a high score of 9.26, doing things that seriously lack supervision. It did not negotiate with customers in advance, did not display clear evidence of violations, did not give customers the opportunity to defend themselves, did not have third-party arbitration, and did not have a judgment. However, based on just one email, if you violate the rules, you can confiscate the customer's account amount and then close the account
翻譯成繁體中文
2025-11-28 22:12
