天眼評分

1.47 /10
Danger

GCMAsia

澳大利亞

2-5年

監管牌照存疑

高級風險隱患

C

添加交易商

對比

我要爆料

爆料

線上開戶
官方網址

天眼評分

監管指數0.00

業務指數6.68

風控指數0.00

軟體指數4.00

牌照指數0.00

線上開戶
官方網址
提示:天眼評分過低,請遠離! 6
上次檢測 : 2024-11-10
  • 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效監管,請注意風險!
  • 該交易商WikiFX實勘差評已達到1條,請注意風險,謹防受害!

天眼鑑定

用戶評價

More

用戶評論

2

條評論

發布評價

firefists
超過1年
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company. In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
Furthermore, the lack of an office or physical presence can also raise concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of the company. In terms of trading specifics, it's difficult to evaluate GCMAsia's platform and services without more information, but it's important to remember that a broker's regulatory status should always be the primary consideration.
翻譯成繁體中文
2023-04-03 18:37
回復
0
0
firefists
超過1年
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia. While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
Based on the lack of regulatory licensing and the findings of Wikifx's on-site investigation that revealed the absence of an office, I would not recommend trading with GCMAsia. While some of their trading conditions may seem attractive, it's important to prioritize safety and security when it comes to choosing a broker. Without proper regulation and oversight, there is a higher risk of encountering fraudulent practices or issues with fund safety.
翻譯成繁體中文
2023-04-03 18:37
回復
0
0