Abstract:Regulatory compliance, transparency, and trustworthiness should always come first when we choose a forex broker. Unfortunately, many traders fall victim to unregulated brokers or poorly monitored platforms that put their funds at risk. In this article, we’ll highlight several brokers with low WikiFX scores and serious complaints from traders worldwide. If you’re looking for a safe trading environment, you should be extremely cautious with the following names.

When choosing a forex broker, regulatory compliance, transparency, and trustworthiness should always come first. Unfortunately, many traders fall victim to unregulated brokers or poorly monitored platforms that put their funds at risk. In this article, we‘ll highlight several brokers with low WikiFX scores and serious complaints from traders worldwide. If you’re looking for a safe trading environment, you should be extremely cautious with the following names.
DeltaStock – WikiFX Score: 2.22/10
DeltaStock has been around for over two decades, but that doesn‘t necessarily make it safe. WikiFX’s on-field investigation found no physical office in Bulgaria, raising a major red flag about its legitimacy. Furthermore, reports on social media suggest that this broker may be freezing investors funds. Traders should think twice before depositing money here.



MTrading – WikiFX Score: 2.39/10
While MTrading promotes its FCA-linked license, its offshore base in SVG is concerning. WikiFX has received multiple complaints from traders in Southeast Asia and Africa, alleging unfair practices. The combination of offshore registration and a history of complaints makes this broker a high-risk choice for traders.


HTFX – WikiFX Score: 2.45/10
HTFX offers a wide range of account types and instruments, but the broker has been hit with over 170 complaints recently. Many victims allege that HTFX engages in fraudulentactivities, preventing withdrawals and manipulating trades. The large number of complaints strongly suggests this broker should be approached with extreme caution.


MultiBank Group – WikiFX Score: 2.59/10
MultiBank Group markets itself as a global trading giant, but WikiFX has published multiple investigative reports raising concerns about its legitimacy. Traders have filed numerous complaints regarding withdrawal issues and potential scams. For more details, see our coverage on forex scams.
Despite its international presence, the risk factor remains high.


Headway – WikiFX Score: 4.31/10
At first glance, Headway looks like a user-friendly broker. However, it operates without regulatory oversight. More than 90 complaints have been received by WikiFX, primarily about withdrawal failures and poor customer service. Without proper licensing, traders have little to no protection if problems occur.


| Broker | WikiFX Score | Year Founded | Headquarters | Regulation Status | Complaints / Issues |
| DeltaStock | 2.22/10 | 1998 | Bulgaria | FSC(status “Exceeded”) | No office found, funds frozen reports |
| MTrading | 2.39/10 | 2012 | SVG | Claims FCA via MONETRIX LTD | Complaints in SEA & Africa |
| HTFX | 2.45/10 | 2018 | Vanuatu | FCA, CySEC, VFSC (offshore) | 170+ scam-related complaints |
| MultiBank | 2.59/10 | 2005 | USA / APAC | Unclear/multiple claims | Numerous withdrawal complaints |
| Headway | 4.31/10 | 2022 | South Africa | Unregulated | 90+ complaints, no protection |
While the above brokers raise serious red flags, there are reliable alternatives that have strong regulatory oversight and positive reputations among traders. Here are some safer options:
If youre a beginner, you might also want to read our guide on how to choose a forex broker.
Your funds deserve a safe and regulated trading environment. Dont fall victim to brokers that could endanger your investments. The brokers listed above may appear legitimate on the surface, but low WikiFX ratings, lack of transparency, and a history of complaints are strong warning signs.
We suggest you:


The RBI Alert List, updated on 19 November 2025, names XM and www.xm.com at row 33. RBI says listed entities are not authorised to deal in forex under FEMA or operate an authorised forex ETP in India. XM also publishes overseas licence and risk information. These facts must stay separate. An overseas licence does not create RBI authorisation for an Indian resident.

The RBI Alert List, updated on 19 November 2025, names eToro and www.etoro.com at row 5. RBI says listed entities are not authorised to deal in forex under FEMA or operate an authorised forex ETP in India. eToro also lists regulated companies in the UK, Europe, Australia, and other markets. Those overseas licences are entity-specific. They do not create RBI authorisation.

A multi-asset liquidity solution can help a broker support FX, CFDs, commodities, and indices through a more unified operating model. But adding asset classes can also create fragmented symbols, pricing, routing, margin rules, records, and client messages if controls are not designed first. This 2026 guide explains how a multi asset liquidity provider, forex CFD liquidity setup, commodity liquidity provider, and indices liquidity provider fit into a broker-owned execution service. It outlines the due-diligence questions, shared-control model, cost drivers, and 90-day implementation plan that help teams expand without making the execution chain harder to explain. The aim is not to promise deeper liquidity or better trading outcomes. It is to create evidence that a broker can supervise market access, trace order events, reconcile costs, and communicate consistently to the relevant clients when conditions are difficult.

The RBI Alert List, updated on 19 November 2025, names Exness and the website www.exness.com. RBI says listed entities are not authorised to deal in forex under FEMA or operate an authorised forex ETP. Exness also publishes overseas regulatory records. These facts must not be mixed. Overseas regulation does not create RBI authorisation for an Indian resident.