Abstract:The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has announced enforcement actions against several former Executive and Non-Executive Directors of Exelcius Prime Ltd, the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) that previously operated the 1Market online trading brand through the websites 1market.eu and 1market.com.

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has announced enforcement actions against several former Executive and Non-Executive Directors of Exelcius Prime Ltd, the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) that previously operated the 1Market online trading brand through the websites 1market.eu and 1market.com.
Exelcius Prime‘s CySEC license was suspended in 2022, and in 2024 the regulator imposed a significant administrative fine on the company. Following that sanction, CySEC conducted a further examination focusing on the compliance and governance responsibilities of the company’s Board of Directors during the relevant period.
CySEC determined that the Board of Directors, during the period 1 January 2021 to 3 August 2022, acted in violation of Cyprus investment services legislation by failing to ensure effective corporate governance and oversight.
The individuals assessed by CySEC were:
According to CySEC, the Board failed to:
As a result of these findings, CySEC imposed the following sanctions:
CySEC decided not to impose fines or other measures on Christos Domazos and Marinos Gialeli, citing factors related to their roles and capacity within the company during the relevant period.
The decision underscores CySECs increasing focus on personal accountability at the board level, particularly in cases involving governance failures, client protection risks, and ineffective oversight within licensed investment firms.
The Exelcius Prime case follows a broader trend among European regulators to hold not only firms, but also individual directors, responsible for failures in governance frameworks and regulatory compliance.


Time is precious, more so in forex trading, where a millisecond delay can either make your winning position turn into a regretful loss or cut short your profit so much that it feels like a loss. While going through numerous user reviews, we often come across the disappointing experiences of slippage draining out their profits due to slow trade order execution. In this article, we have elaborated on low latency, its impact on your trading experience, a host of factors that determine it, etc.

As we examine plexytrade, we come across attractive terms like opening the account with just $50 and enjoying 100% tradable bonus and 120% cash bonus. These terms can prompt anyone to open a plexytrade trading account. But as an informed trader, you need to go beyond these marketing terms. What is the real-time trading experience? Are users receiving the benefits as promised? The plexytrade reviews shared by users online indicate that not everything is good at this broker. Traders have claimed pending withdrawals, high slippage eating into their margins and unwanted account suspensions by the broker. In this article, we have examined user allegations as well as provide our in-depth perspective into the broker’s regulatory status.

The moment the SQUARED FINANCIAL review column opens, a pattern of disturbing complaints appears, demonstrating massive user frustration over alleged withdrawal denials for months, fund disappearance from the platform, frequent login issues and more. These may be user allegations, but the lack of response from the broker side on many such reviews causes some doubt over this Seychelles-based brokerage firm. This article thus aims to provide an insight into the growing user resentment considering the nature of their complaints found until June 2026. Additionally, we will share the broker’s offerings and regulatory framework, allowing you to figure it out better.

Yes, it’s true! The Government of India decided to ban Telegram in the country on June 16, 2026, surprising many who rely on this platform for daily trading alerts & advisories. The ban has taken effect under Section 69A of the IT Act as part of the government’s plan to stop fraud during the NEET-UG re-examination. According to reports, fraudulent rackets were selling fake question papers for amounts ranging from INR 5,000 to 50,000. But the ban, which will be effective until June 22, 2026, affects far more than students. It transcended from a messaging blockout to a sudden disengagement from the app that shaped many traders’ daily routine over time. Out of the 15 crore plus unique registered investors in India, a large chunk sought trading tips, market news, along with buy and sell signals on Telegram. It must have taken investors by surprise. But is the ban detrimental to traders, or is there something more than meets the eye?