Abstract:9Cents (established 2024) presents the risk profile of a newly formed, unsupervised financial entity. Despite utilizing the reputable MT5 trading infrastructure, the broker operates without effective regulatory oversight and has already accrued serious allegations regarding fund safety. 9Cents is classified as a High-Risk Platform, primarily due to the discord between its high minimum deposit requirements for competitive accounts and its lack of legal accountability or capital protection schemes.

WikiFX Score: 1.82 (Dangerously Low)
Regulatory Status: Unregulated / Offshore (Saint Lucia)
9Cents (established 2024) presents the risk profile of a newly formed, unsupervised financial entity. Despite utilizing the reputable MT5 trading infrastructure, the broker operates without effective regulatory oversight and has already accrued serious allegations regarding fund safety. 9Cents is classified as a High-Risk Platform, primarily due to the discord between its high minimum deposit requirements for competitive accounts and its lack of legal accountability or capital protection schemes.
The following checklist summarizes the operational capabilities versus the structural risks associated with 9Cents:
A formal audit of the regulatory data indicates that 9Cents operates without authorization from any major financial oversight body (such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC).
Jurisdictional Analysis:
The broker is registered in Saint Lucia. From an auditing perspective, registration in Saint Lucia usually constitutes a simple business incorporation rather than a Forex brokerage license.
Conclusion on Safety: The WikiFX score of 1.82 reflects a near-total lack of safety protocols. The “Influence Rank” of D further confirms the broker has little to no reputable standing in the global market.
9Cents offers dynamic leverage scaling based on account tiers:
Analyst Note: While leverage up to 1:400 offers high capital efficiency for aggressive traders, it far exceeds the safety caps (typically 1:30) enforced by Tier-1 regulators. This confirms the broker's offshore nature, prioritizing flexibility over trader protection. This level of exposure can lead to rapid account liquidation during volatility events.
The broker's pricing model is heavily tiered, penalizing smaller investors while gatekeeping competitive pricing behind high deposit walls.
The platform utilizes MetaTrader 5 (MT5). The software qualification is listed as “Main Label” (Perfect rating), which implies 9Cents has full control over the server rather than just a white-label lease. While MT5 is a robust platform supporting EA (Expert Advisors) and automated trading, the software is only as safe as the broker managing the backend execution.
Data from the casesText file highlights an immediate red flag regarding fund processing.
Case ID: Deposit Failure (Chile)
Evidence:
Institutional Assessment:Unsafe / Do Not Trade
9Cents exhibits the classic characteristics of a high-risk offshore entity. While the provision of MT5 is a positive technical feature, the commercial terms are predatory. The requirement of a $25,000 deposit to access competitive ECN spreads—while operating without a license and failing to credit small $200 deposits—renders this broker a severe risk to client capital.
The WikiFX Score of 1.82 is justified. The regulatory vacuum in Saint Lucia, combined with verified liquidity issues (missing deposits), suggests a high probability of capital loss.
Actionable Advice: Traders are strongly advised to avoid unregulated entities demanding high initial capital.
For the most current regulatory certificates and real-time blocklisting status, verify 9Cents on the WikiFX App.

Mazi Finance is a trading company registered in Saint Lucia, an offshore location. Recently, it has received a lot of attention in the trading world. The company shows off many modern trading features, but when we look closer, we find many potential dangers. Before any trader thinks about opening an account, they need to understand the most important finding from our research: Mazi Finance does not have proper regulation. This single fact creates major warning signs about whether client capital is safe.

When you look for information about a forex broker, you often find a confusing mix of great reviews and serious warnings. This is especially true for Pemaxx, where traders have one main question: Is Pemaxx Safe or Scam? The internet has many different user experiences, making it hard to know what's true. This article won't give you a simple yes or no answer. Instead, we'll do an objective, fact-based study to help you make a smart choice. We'll look at the available information, focusing on real user reviews, common Pemaxx Complaints, and whether it follows proper regulations. By looking at patterns in both good and bad reports, we want to give you a clear picture of the risks and warning signs with this broker, helping you protect your capital.

The regulatory status of Pemaxx is a major concern for traders. When you search online, you can find the broker claiming to be regulated, but financial watchdog sites show serious warnings and user complaints. This creates a confusing and potentially risky situation for anyone considering an investment. The goal of this analysis is to clear up the confusion. We will examine the available information, explain the facts about the Pemaxx License status, and look at the risks for traders.

HFM users report withdrawal delays and missing funds. Read verified scam complaints, check regulatory info, and report your HFM case now.