Abstract:When selecting a broker, understanding its regulatory standing is an important part of assessing overall reliability. For traders seeking to protect their capital, ensuring that a platform operates under recognised and stringent oversight can make all the difference. Keep reading to learn more about FXVIEW and its licenses.

FXVIEW is a brokerage firm that offers online trading services to clients around the world. It holds licences from regulators in Cyprus, South Africa, and previously in the United Kingdom. While some of these licences are still active, others have been revoked or have raised concerns. Traders should carefully check the status of each licence before deciding to open an account.

FXVIEW is licensed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under licence number 367/18. This is its main and most reliable licence. CySEC is the financial regulator of Cyprus and a recognised authority within the European Union.
The licence held by FXVIEW is a Straight Through Processing (STP) type, which means that trades are sent directly to the market without interference from the broker. This licence is currently active and marked as “Regulated”, showing that FXVIEW is meeting the requirements set by CySEC.
For traders in the EU or EEA, this licence offers a level of protection and transparency.

FXVIEW was once listed with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, under licence number 850138. However, this licence has now been revoked. The FCA is known for its strict rules and is considered one of the most respected regulators in the world.
The revoked status could be linked to changes caused by Brexit, as many brokers had to adjust their regulatory structures after the UK left the European Union. Still, a revoked licence is a warning sign. It means the broker is no longer authorised by the FCA to offer services in the UK. UK traders, or anyone relying on FCA regulation, should take extra care.

FXVIEW is also listed with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa under licence number 50410. The FSCA is responsible for making sure financial companies in South Africa follow the rules.
However, FXVIEWs licence status with the FSCA is marked as “Exceeded”, which means the broker might be doing more than what the licence allows. This could create risks for traders, especially if something goes wrong and the FSCA cannot provide full protection.
Licences are one of the most important things to look at when choosing a broker. But its not enough to just see that a licence exists, as you also need to check if it is active and what it allows the broker to do.

Platforms like WikiFX help traders by checking licences and looking at whether brokers follow rules in the countries where they operate. In FXVIEWs case, the CySEC licence is active, but the FCA licence is revoked, and the FSCA licence has issues with scope. This mixed status should make traders think carefully before moving forward.
Understanding a brokers true regulatory standing can help prevent problems later. Always take time to verify the facts before sending any funds or placing trades.


EMAR Markets, a South Africa-based forex broker, allegedly never misses the opportunity to disappoint its traders, according to their reviews. The user allegations present a disturbing picture, with users repeatedly complaining about pending EMAR MARKETS withdrawal processing in the pretext of a data review process that reportedly seems to have no end. They even accused the broker of withholding funds even after they paid the verification fee worth 2,000 to 5,000 yuan as requested. Some users complained about the not-so-meaningful updates and complete communication halt that further made the overall trading scenario precarious. In this EMAR MARKETS review, we have examined serious user allegations to provide an overview of the overall situation. To further help you assess its legitimacy, we have provided a regulatory framework of this company.

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.