Abstract:BitPania is a relatively new brokerage established in 2024 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform markets itself as a digital trading solution offering multiple account types and support for automated trading (EAs). However, potential investors should approach with significant caution. Currently, BitPania holds a WikiFX Score of 1.20, a very low rating that reflects its lack of regulatory oversight and recent user complaints regarding withdrawals.

BitPania is a relatively new brokerage established in 2024 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform markets itself as a digital trading solution offering multiple account types and support for automated trading (EAs). However, potential investors should approach with significant caution. Currently, BitPania holds a WikiFX Score of 1.20, a very low rating that reflects its lack of regulatory oversight and recent user complaints regarding withdrawals.
The following points summarize the key features and risks associated with this broker based on current data:
When evaluating the safety of a broker, the primary factor is regulatory oversight.
Regulatory Status: Unregulated
According to the available data, BitPania is not regulated by any recognized financial institution. The broker is registered in Saint Lucia, a jurisdiction often used by offshore entities due to its relaxed registration requirements. Unlike brokers regulated by Tier-1 authorities (such as the FCA in the UK or ASIC in Australia), BitPania is not legally required to segregate client funds or participate in compensation schemes in the event of insolvency.
The WikiFX system has assigned BitPania a score of 1.20, which is considered high-risk. Operating without a license means there is no government body monitoring the broker's activities to ensure fair trading practices. Traders have no recourse through an ombudsman if disputes arise regarding pricing or withdrawals.
In the last three months, WikiFX has received multiple complaints regarding BitPania, specifically from users in regions like Colombia. The common themes involve inability to withdraw funds and account blocking.
Users have reported severe difficulties when attempting to access their capital. One user detailed an experience where, after accumulating a balance of nearly $7,134, their account was blocked while trades were open, resulting in significant losses. When the user attempted to resolve the issue, an analyst allegedly demanded an additional $2,019 deposit to “recover” losses. When the user refused, the remaining balance was withheld under the guise of operational costs.

Another case highlights aggressive sales tactics. A trader reported starting with a small investment ($244) but was pressured to add $3,000 more. After investing a total of over $2,000 and growing the account to $7,000, the user found their inquiries about withdrawals were ignored. Eventually, the account was blocked, and communication with the advisor ceased completely.
A third report describes a scenario where the broker requested upfront deposits to pay “taxes” before a withdrawal could be processed. The user was directed to register on external crypto platforms, but after complying, messages were ignored and calls were rejected.

BitPania offers a tiered account structure, but the entry barriers are significantly higher than the industry average.
The broker offers seven account types, but even the entry-level “Basic” account requires a deposit of $5,000, which is unusually high for a retail broker. The tiers are as follows:
Leverage offerings vary by account type.
High leverage (1:100) can amplify potential profits but also increases the risk of rapid capital loss, especially when combined with an unregulated environment.
BitPania presents several critical warning signs for potential investors. While the broker supports automated trading and offers a variety of account types, the lack of regulation, the high minimum deposit of $5,000, and the low WikiFX Score of 1.20 outweigh these features. Furthermore, documented user complaints regarding blocked accounts and withdrawal denials suggest a high level of risk.
Investors are strongly advised to prioritize brokers that hold valid licenses from reputable regulatory bodies.
To stay safe and view the latest regulatory certificates, check BitPania on the WikiFX App.

Has eFX Markets taken away your deposited capital? Faced losses due to manipulative ‘stop loss and take profit’ orders? Were you denied fund withdrawals because you did not finish your trading lot? Did the broker lure you into trading through a fake welcome bonus and scam you later? Traders have accused the Virgin Islands-based forex broker of driving these fraudulent practices. In this eFX Markets review article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

Has OTET Markets scammed you by freezing your forex trading account? Were you caught off guard by hidden trading rules diminishing your trading gains? Is the Otet Markets withdrawal process too slow or negligent? Don’t you receive adequate support from the broker’s customer care department? You are not alone! Many traders have opposed the Saint Lucia-based forex broker for their alleged malicious tactics. In this Otet Markets review article, we have covered a series of complaints against the broker. Read on!

Have you witnessed a failure of order closure by the E-Global Forex executive? Did you see an unprecedented rise in a forex pair not available on platforms other than that of this broker? Did the slow trading server prevent you from closing your trade at a favorable price? Has the broker scammed you after earning you from your investment? Many traders have expressed disappointment over the unfair forex trading practices at the US-based forex broker. In this E-Global Forex review article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

JP Markets SA (Pty) Ltd holds FSCA License No.46855. Learn about its regulation, derivatives trading license, and MT4/MT5 platform compliance.