Abstract:China’s Supreme People’s Court disclosed a major cross-border investment scam in which fraudsters used fake gold trading and fabricated profits to deceive victims, resulting in losses exceeding 280 million yuan. The case highlights the growing sophistication of online investment fraud and reinforces the need for investor vigilance and proper due diligence.

On February 26, China‘s Supreme People’s Court held a press conference to announce a series of representative cases highlighting the judiciarys ongoing efforts to combat telecommunications and online fraud. Among the cases disclosed was a major cross-border scam involving 14 defendants led by an individual surnamed Yu. The case revolved around a scheme that combined stock recommendation tactics with fraudulent investment operations, ultimately causing enormous financial losses to victims.

According to information presented at the briefing, the criminal group targeted mainland Chinese residents by promoting what appeared to be legitimate investment opportunities. Gold trading, particularly so-called “high-return” investments, was used as the central lure. Exploiting investors natural desire for profit, members of the syndicate carefully constructed a façade of credibility. They posed as experienced investors, created the image of celebrity mentors, and fabricated records of successful trades to convince victims that substantial gains were within easy reach.
Investigators revealed that Yu and his associates operated through a platform known as “Chuanglifeng Gold Industry,” which falsely claimed to offer access to gold trading services, including “London gold” transactions. The group established its operational base overseas, where dedicated scam centres were set up to coordinate activities. Working in a structured and coordinated manner, syndicate members added large numbers of potential victims through social networking platforms. After initial contact, victims were gradually guided into private chat groups and livestream sessions designed to reinforce the illusion of professional investment guidance.
Within these groups, fraudsters shared manipulated screenshots of profits and repeatedly promoted narratives suggesting that following the advice of designated “teachers” or “analysts” would generate reliable returns. Victims were persuaded to deposit funds into the platform, believing they were participating in genuine gold trades. In reality, no legitimate trading took place. Funds transferred by victims were channelled through third-party payment systems and moved across multiple accounts before being consolidated into accounts controlled by the fraudulent platform. The proceeds were then distributed among members of the operation according to pre-arranged profit-sharing agreements.
Authorities stated that over a period of approximately one year, the scheme resulted in losses affecting 1,789 victims, with total damages exceeding 280 million yuan. The scale of the case underscores the growing sophistication of modern investment scams, particularly those leveraging digital platforms and cross-border structures to obscure the movement of funds and evade detection.
For observers in Malaysia and across the region, the case reflects patterns that are increasingly familiar. Fraud schemes frequently rely on social media outreach, carefully scripted communication, and the promise of unusually high returns to attract investors. The use of professional-looking platforms and fabricated profit data continues to blur the line between legitimate investment services and criminal operations, making vigilance more important than ever.
Financial regulators and enforcement agencies consistently remind investors that genuine trading platforms do not guarantee profits, nor do they rely on informal messaging channels to solicit deposits. As digital finance becomes more accessible, the responsibility for verification and due diligence remains firmly with individual investors. Cases such as this serve as a stark reminder that the appearance of legitimacy can be meticulously engineered, while the financial consequences for victims can be devastating and irreversible.


CAPEX.com, a Cyprus-based forex broker, has been receiving flak from its clients all over for its alleged trading practices. These include allegations concerning withdrawal denials to clients, pressuring them into investing more, giving them false promise returns, and causing bonus discrepancies and numerous reported fund scams. With these allegations continuing to grow, it was important for us at WikiFX to highlight before you. This 2026 CAPEX.com review article is aimed at making you aware of trading glitches reported by users. Read on as we share an in-depth guide.

Did Switch Markets lure you into trading with it using a fake bonus scheme? Did your deposit fail to show up in your forex trading account? Were you subject to heavy slippage once the stop-loss triggered? Did you receive a notification from the broker about the sudden deposit seizure? These issues are no longer yours only. Many traders have faced these and vented out on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Switch Markets review article, we have investigated some complaints against the forex broker. Keep reading!

Failed to withdraw funds from RoboForex despite following up with its customer support team numerous times? Did the Belize-based broker close your forex trading account when you requested a fund withdrawal? Did your deposits fail to show up in your trading account? Were you prevented from placing trades due to issues concerning the RoboForex login? These issues have become increasingly common for traders. In this RoboForex review article, we have examined these issues thoroughly to allow you to make an informed decision about the broker. Have a look!

Is your Aximtrade withdrawal application pending for months despite everything right from your end? Even after months, do you still see the withdrawal application under review while logging in to the trading platform? Or does the broker official tell you that the withdrawal is approved, but give you the excuse of the payment provider’s unavailability? These issues have allegedly become the norm at Aximtrade, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker. In this Aximtrade review article, we have highlighted numerous complaints that need your attention.