Home -
Broker -
Main body -

WikiFX Express

XM
FXTM
IC
EC markets
TMGM
D prime
FOREX.com
pepperstone
octa
SECURETRADE

WIKIFX REPORT: Investors take Forex platform ROFX and its founders to Court

RoFx | 2022-06-17 11:47

Abstract:Dozens of victims of the ROFX forex trading platform have sued the company and its founders for alleged fraud.

computer_code_hacker-978x400.jpg

Dozens of victims of forex trading platform ROFX have taken the entity and its founders to Court over alleged fraud.

The Complaint, seen by FX News Group, was filed in the Florida Southern District Court on September 29, 2021.

The plaintiffs are Ryan Birmingham, Roman Leonov, Mitchell Parent, Jonathan Zarley, and Steven Hansen – ROFX.net investors and citizens of the United States of America. Further, there are letters from 300 victims in support of forming a class.

The list of defendants includes: ROFX.net, Auro Advantages LLC, Aware Choice Ltd., Boonruk Ruamkit Co., Ltd., Brass Marker s.r.o., Easy Com LC, Epayments Systems Ltd., Ester Holdings Inc., Global E-Advantages LLC, Grovee, LLC, Igoria Trade S.A., IT Outsourcing Co., Ltd., Notus LLC, Shopostar, LLC, VDD-Trading, Ltd., Wealthy Developments LP, Andrei Fetin, Anna Shymko, Anton Bilous, Borys Konovalenko, Dmytro Fokin, Jorge Luis Castillo, Manuchar Daraselia, Mikhail Rymanov, Natalia Los, Nattpemol Krinara, PapahraTsor Nrviratporn, Peter Mogilniy, Stanislav Khomenko, Youras Ziankovich and John Does 1-30.

According to the Complaint, the defendants orchestrated a massive international scheme to defraud the investors by soliciting them to deposit money or cash equivalents with ROFX, a “robotically operated foreign exchange trading” platform that purportedly utilized algorithms to trade on behalf of investors. In exchange for the funds, the defendants falsely promised a return on investment in the form of a percentage of ROFXs daily trading profit that never came to pass.

After maximizing their current account balances and creating the illusion of stability for in excess of two years, ROFX distributed little profit to its investors, prevented investors from making withdrawals, and thereafter stole all remaining investment capital to perpetuate a massive fraud that is global in scope.

The defendants‘ conduct occurred as early as 2016 and has continued to the present. The Complaint alleges that, as a consequence of the defendants’ fraudulent scheme, the plaintiffs and the class members suffered significant harm, losing tens of millions of dollars by investing with ROFX under the false impression that they were investing with a legitimate foreign exchange trading platform.

The plaintiffs explain that they have brought the emergency action for fraud pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on behalf of a global class of ROFX investors. In addition to damages, including costs of suit, interest, and reasonable attorneys‘ fees resulting from the defendants’ fraudulent conduct, unjust enrichment and violations of federal RICO statutes, the plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, seek injunctive relief to maintain the status quo and preserve assets for the victims of this fraudulent scheme.

Specifically, the plaintiffs seek an immediate order: (i) freezing all ROFX assets and enjoining and restraining Defendants from dissipating or encumbering any of these assets; (ii) preventing the destruction of financial records and any other relevant documents; and (iii) permitting expedited discovery into the facts alleged herein.

The plaintiffs claim that the victims reported ROFX account balances are in excess of $15 million and growing.

BrokerDealerForex tradingForex BrokerForex news

Related broker

Not Regulated
RoFx
Company name:RoFx
Score
1.63
Website:https://rofx.net/
5-10 years | Questionable Regulatory License | Suspicious Operational Region | High Potential Risk
Score
1.63

Read more

FINEX Review: A+++ Rating Does Not Remove Risks - How to Read Spread, Withdrawals & Other Aspects

FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.

Original 2026-08-14 18:09

Tier 1 Liquidity Forex in 2026: What Institutional Really Means for a Broker

Choosing a tier 1 liquidity forex is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how an institutional liquidity provider, bank liquidity forex, or interbank liquidity provider arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best tier 1 liquidity forex” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

Original 2026-08-14 17:20

MIFX Review 2026: How to Read Spreads, Withdrawal Rules and the Complaint Route

MIFX review 2026: understand published commissions and spreads, the withdrawal process, Instant Withdrawal conditions, and the PT Monex Investindo Futures complaint route without turning community discussion into factual allegations.

Original 2026-08-13 18:41

Forex Liquidity Provider in 2026: Why the Tightest Spread is Not Always the Best Execution Decision

Choosing a forex liquidity provider is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how a forex LP, FX liquidity provider, or liquidity provider forex arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best forex liquidity provider” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

Original 2026-08-13 18:08

WikiFX Express

XM
FXTM
IC
EC markets
TMGM
D prime
FOREX.com
pepperstone
octa
SECURETRADE

WikiFX Broker

Eightcap

Eightcap

Regulated
vantage

vantage

Regulated
pepperstone

pepperstone

Frequent Complaint
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
FOREX.com

FOREX.com

Domestic Regulation
D prime

D prime

Regulated
Eightcap

Eightcap

Regulated
vantage

vantage

Regulated
pepperstone

pepperstone

Frequent Complaint
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
FOREX.com

FOREX.com

Domestic Regulation
D prime

D prime

Regulated

WikiFX Broker

Eightcap

Eightcap

Regulated
vantage

vantage

Regulated
pepperstone

pepperstone

Frequent Complaint
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
FOREX.com

FOREX.com

Domestic Regulation
D prime

D prime

Regulated
Eightcap

Eightcap

Regulated
vantage

vantage

Regulated
pepperstone

pepperstone

Frequent Complaint
TMGM

TMGM

Regulated
FOREX.com

FOREX.com

Domestic Regulation
D prime

D prime

Regulated

Latest News

Dollar and Asian FX Steady Before US CPI

WikiFX
2026-08-13 12:00

Vestrado Review: A 4.84 Score, an Offshore Base and an FSCA Status Worth Verifying

WikiFX
2026-08-14 13:00

KCB Review: Is Your Deposit Safe?

WikiFX
2026-08-13 15:00

Traze Review: What Traders Should Know Before Depositing

WikiFX
2026-08-12 13:00

Exness Review for Indian Traders 2026: The RBI Question Comes Before Leverage and Spreads

WikiFX
2026-08-12 19:25

Just Markets Review: 1.82 Score and No Regulation Despite Positive Reviews

WikiFX
2026-08-14 17:00

Octa Review 2026: Severe Withdrawal Complaints and High Risk Signals

WikiFX
2026-08-13 12:30

Review 2026: RoboMarkets Regulation, Platform Access, and Trader Feedback

WikiFX
2026-08-13 14:00

Why Importers Panic When Dollars Dry Up, and Why You Should Care

WikiFX
2026-08-14 16:00

Crypto Revenue Falls in Q2 as Another Platform Moves Into CFDs

WikiFX
2026-08-13 14:31

Rate Calc

USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0

Amount

USD

Available

CNY
Calculate

You may also like

CryptxQuantumAi

CryptxQuantumAi

Alternative Leaders GmbH

Alternative Leaders GmbH

Doronzo AG

Doronzo AG

Starling Capital FX

Starling Capital FX

Bullnex Markets

Bullnex Markets

Bitlencex

Bitlencex

Smart Eaners Market

Smart Eaners Market

Best On Binary

Best On Binary

FIFO Markets

FIFO Markets

Esope Hub

Esope Hub