Abstract:EUR/USD holds at around 1.0860s as traders brace for the Fed and ECB's decisions. The US core PCE, the Fed's preferred gauge for inflation, edges down, sparking speculations for a Fed pivot. Consumer Sentiment improved, while inflation expectations ticked lower.

• The US core PCE, the Feds preferred gauge for inflation, edges down, sparking speculations for a Fed pivot.
• Consumer Sentiment improved, while inflation expectations ticked lower.
• EUR/USD Price Analysis: Upward biased, but short-term neutral, ahead of Fed and ECBs decisions.
EUR/USD holds at around 1.0860s as traders brace for the Fed and ECB's decisions. The US core PCE, the Fed's preferred gauge for inflation, edges down, sparking speculations for a Fed pivot. Consumer Sentiment improved, while inflation expectations ticked lower.
SOFT US CORE PCE INCREASED THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE FED LIFTING 25 BPS
The Core PCE price Index is the less volatile measure of the PCE price index which excludes the more volatile and seasonal food and energy prices. Wall Street finished the week with gains, shrugging off worries about an impending recession in the United States. Thursday‘s data cemented the case for a robust economy, with Q4’s expanding by 2.9% QoQ above estimates of 2.6%, while Q3 remained at 3.2%. That sparked conversations of a possible “soft landing” by the US Federal Reserve.
In the meantime, Friday‘s data revealed that inflation is cooling down, probably at a faster pace than estimated. The Fed’s favorite inflation gauge, the core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) was aligned with estimates of 4.4% YoY, but below Novembers 4.7%. That augmented speculations around the Fed would slash the size of rate hikes, as December marked the first lift in rates not being at 75 bps. Instead, Powell and Co. went for a 50 bps as it was appropriate, as mentioned by them while emphasizing that the pace was not as important as the peak of rates.
As Friday‘s session ends, the CME FedWatchTool shows that odds for a Fed’s 25 bps rate hike stand at 99.2%, and traders are foreseeing the Federal Funds rate (FFR) to peak at around 5%, by Marchs meeting.
In another tranche of data, a poll from the University of Michigan reported the US Consumer Sentiment, which improved vs. the preliminary reading of 64.6 to 64.9. Data revealed that inflation expectations for 1-year are estimated at 3.9%, lower than the previous poll, while for a 5-year, they stood at 2.9%.
Across the pond, European Central Bank (ECB) officials had reiterated they would raise rates at the upcoming meeting on February 2. ECBs President Christine Lagarde said that the bank would “stay the course” with a 50 bps rate hike in January and the next meeting after that, albeit inflation in the Eurozone slid to 9.2%.
That said, the stage is set with the Fed lifting rates to 4.50-4.75% and the ECB to 2.50%, which would reduce the spread between the US and the Eurozone. Hence, the EUR/USD could resume its upward bias and test 1.1000 unless an unpleasant dovish surprise by Lagarde caps the rally and tumbles the EUR/USD.
EUR/USD Technical Analysis
Ahead into the next week, the EUR/USD remains upward biased. The pullback in the last couple of days could be attributed to the 1.0900 mark probing to be difficult resistance to hurdle. Also, the monetary policy decisions of the ECB and the Fed were an excuse for traders to close their positions.
Even though the EUR/USD is pressured, the price action from Thursday and Friday formed a series of successive candlesticks with a long bottom wick, suggesting that some buying pressure is resting. Nevertheless, the commitment o hold EUR/USD long positions throughout the weekend, and with uncertainty in the financial markets, kept the EUR/USD shy of reclaiming 1.0900.
A breach of the latter would expose the 1.1000 mark. As an alternate scenario, the EUR/USD diving below 1.0835, the weekly low, and the pair would dip toward the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at 1.0788.

The visible fee in an MT4 white label proposal is rarely the real cost of operating it. For an existing broker, the decision is not simply whether an MT4 white label platform is “cheap” or “expensive.” The real question is whether the commercial model remains viable after integration, support, data, client migration, compliance, and exit costs are included. That is why an MT4 white label cost review should be built as a 24- to 36-month operating case. It should compare three credible choices: 1. Keep the present MT4 setup and improve its weakest controls. 2. Replace the MT4 white label provider but retain the client proposition. 3. Migrate selected clients or products to another platform while running MT4 in parallel. This guide explains how to build that case without relying on headline prices or generic vendor claims.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has grown remarkably recently. However, it has also amplified the scope for financial fraud. One such is the rapid use of deepfake technology involving AI-generated videos, images and audio clips imitating real people. Fraudsters are leveraging these technologies to impersonate financial advisers, celebrities, business leaders and government officials to lure victims into fake investment schemes. Understanding the emerging implications, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has cautioned investors of investment avenues promoted through convincing AI-generated content. Seemingly authentic, deepfakes are designed to manipulate trust and make people transfer funds before authenticating the investment’s legitimacy.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.

ABET, a Bulgaria-based brokerage firm, faces severe allegations from users for the reportedly inefficient way it handles their funds. While some alleged illegitimate account blocks by the broker, others reported fund scams and trade manipulations. These ABET reviews have raised question marks over the broker’s legitimacy.