Abstract:Asian markets ended mixed, but mostly higher as investors across the region reacted to the news that President Biden and U.S. lawmakers struck a tentative deal to raise the debt ceiling in the U.S. The deal will be voted on later this week and if passed will allow the U.S. government to avoid a potentially catastrophic financial scenario.

Asian markets ended mixed, but mostly higher as investors across the region reacted to the news that President Biden and U.S. lawmakers struck a tentative deal to raise the debt ceiling in the U.S. The deal will be voted on later this week and if passed will allow the U.S. government to avoid a potentially catastrophic financial scenario.
Japans Nikkei finished the day with a 1% gain, leading the region. The Nikkei continues rising to new heights, and has now reached levels not seen since July 1990. Shares of Softbank Group surged 8.2% higher, while Sony shares retreated by 0.7%. Among the major exporters Toyota lost 0.4%, Panasonic climbed 0.8% higher, and Canon tacked on 1%.
In Australia the S&P/ASX 200 rose by 0.9%, with the big four banks supporting the broader market. Shares of ANZ were 1.2% higher, NAB added 1.3%, Commonwealth Bank advanced by 1.4%, and Westpac had a 1.2% gain. The major miners also provided support for the broader market, with BHP rising by 1.4% and Rio Tinto adding 1.2%.
Mainland China was one of the weak spots in the region as it delivered a mixed performance. The benchmark Shanghai Composite rose by 0.3%, but the smaller cap Shenzhen Composite retreated by 0.8%. Over in Hong Kong the Hang Seng also underperformed, dropping by 1% to lead losses for the region.
In South Korea the Kospi remained unchanged as markets there remained closed for a public holiday, while Taiwans Taiex rose by 0.8%.
Southeast Asian markets ended the day mixed as Malaysia‘s KLCI edged higher by 0.2%, while Singapore’s Straits Times Index retreated 0.4%.


tegasFX, a Comoros-based forex broker, has been reported by many traders as a fraudulent operation. Traders allege that the brokerage house deliberately deletes their profits while blaming them for abusive trading. In addition, some users have accused the broker of excessive slippage draining their capital. If you have been affected by these trading circumstances, you must read this tegasFX review, where we have highlighted allegations made by traders. These comments might resonate with you. Let’s read on!

OANDA presents a mixed picture for forex traders, earning a modest 5.8 out of 10 overall rating based on 218 reviews and a "Use with Caution" recommendation. While the broker demonstrates notable strengths in responsive customer support, maintains a generally good reputation for safety, and offers a user-friendly interface that appeals to both beginners and experienced traders, significant concerns emerge from the substantial 33.9% negative review rate. Read more.

Merrill Lynch presents a troubling picture for forex traders, with an alarming 95.1% negative review rate across 142 total reviews resulting in a concerning 2.3 out of 10 overall rating and a "Use with Caution" designation. The overwhelming sentiment from the trading community reveals serious operational challenges that potential clients must carefully consider before opening an account. Read this extensive report for an informed decision on this broker.

FOREX.com presents a troubling paradox that should give traders serious pause before committing their capital. Despite accumulating 218 reviews and showcasing notable strengths like responsive customer support, a user-friendly interface, and fast execution with low latency, the broker ultimately earns a "Not Recommended" status with a middling 6.5 out of 10 rating. While 154 positive reviews might initially seem encouraging, the concerning 19.7% negative rate reveals systemic issues that overshadow any technical advantages. The most alarming problems reported by traders center on fund safety issues, withdrawal delays and rejections, and support teams that are slow to respond with no meaningful solutions—a stark contradiction to claims of responsive service.