Abstract:In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trade’s unethical practices.

In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trades unethical practices.

The Victim's Account
Abdel, a 23-year-old trader from Yemen, has detailed a troubling experience with PO Trade, also known as Pocket Option. According to Abdel, after successfully trading on the platform, his account was suddenly banned, and his substantial profits were confiscated. He states:
“I traded in PO TRADE LTD/POCKET OPTION correctly and officially, and I have evidence that my transactions are legitimate. My profits exceeded $115 million, but the company blocked my account and stole my earnings, claiming it was due to a technical glitch.”





Abdel alleges that PO Trade manipulated transaction timings in his account statement to justify their actions. He points out discrepancies in the timing of one particular transaction, stating:
“The transaction No. 35272010 shows a time of 11:45:54 on 5/26/2024, but the actual time was 00:45:54 on 5/27/2024. I have documented screenshots of my transactions that prove the legitimacy of my profits.”
Evidence of Fraudulent Practices
Abdel has gathered evidence, including screenshots of his account showing the correct transaction times and amounts. He asserts that he will not rest until he recovers his funds:
“I will continue to demand my rights until I recover all my profits. I have all the documents that prove my case, and I will not give up.”
WikiFX's Role in Protecting Traders
WikiFX is dedicated to safeguarding the legitimate rights of forex traders. This case against PO Trade serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with unregulated brokers. The platform's commitment to transparency and accountability in the forex industry is crucial for protecting traders from fraud.
On WikiFX, this broker has been given a low score of 2.14/10. This is a red flag.

Conclusion
The experience of Abdel with PO Trade is a cautionary tale for all forex traders. It underscores the importance of due diligence when choosing a broker and the potential consequences of trusting unregulated entities. As this case unfolds, it is vital for traders to remain vigilant and aware of their rights. WikiFX will continue to expose fraudulent practices and advocate for the rights of traders everywhere.
If you have experienced similar issues with PO Trade or any other broker, consider reaching out to WikiFX for assistance. Your voice can help bring attention to these fraudulent practices and protect fellow traders from potential scams.


For any trader doing research, the main question is always about safety and whether a broker is legitimate. When it comes to AssetsFX, the information shows a clear and worrying picture right from the start. This summary gives you the most important findings first, so you can understand the risks right away. Read on!

traze, a United Kingdom-based forex broker, recently received negative reviews mostly around the way it executed trades for its clients. Some vehemently accused the broker of closing trades before and after market hours, with some even claiming trade execution on weekends. Such trades reportedly piled losses for traders. As a result, many of them shared negative traze reviews online. In this article, we have investigated these claims. Read on!

LONG ASIA, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker, is repeatedly making headlines with users continuing to allege foul play in the trading activities. They keep making accusations of the broker denying their legitimate profits earned on the platform. Cases of withdrawal denials have reportedly taken precedence on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Also, the New Zealand Financial Market Authority (FMA) has denied any authorization to LONG ASIA. This made the LONG ASIA review article pertinent for all those traders who expect to grow their portfolio through this brokerage entity. Read on

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.