Abstract:In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trade’s unethical practices.

In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trades unethical practices.

The Victim's Account
Abdel, a 23-year-old trader from Yemen, has detailed a troubling experience with PO Trade, also known as Pocket Option. According to Abdel, after successfully trading on the platform, his account was suddenly banned, and his substantial profits were confiscated. He states:
“I traded in PO TRADE LTD/POCKET OPTION correctly and officially, and I have evidence that my transactions are legitimate. My profits exceeded $115 million, but the company blocked my account and stole my earnings, claiming it was due to a technical glitch.”





Abdel alleges that PO Trade manipulated transaction timings in his account statement to justify their actions. He points out discrepancies in the timing of one particular transaction, stating:
“The transaction No. 35272010 shows a time of 11:45:54 on 5/26/2024, but the actual time was 00:45:54 on 5/27/2024. I have documented screenshots of my transactions that prove the legitimacy of my profits.”
Evidence of Fraudulent Practices
Abdel has gathered evidence, including screenshots of his account showing the correct transaction times and amounts. He asserts that he will not rest until he recovers his funds:
“I will continue to demand my rights until I recover all my profits. I have all the documents that prove my case, and I will not give up.”
WikiFX's Role in Protecting Traders
WikiFX is dedicated to safeguarding the legitimate rights of forex traders. This case against PO Trade serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with unregulated brokers. The platform's commitment to transparency and accountability in the forex industry is crucial for protecting traders from fraud.
On WikiFX, this broker has been given a low score of 2.14/10. This is a red flag.

Conclusion
The experience of Abdel with PO Trade is a cautionary tale for all forex traders. It underscores the importance of due diligence when choosing a broker and the potential consequences of trusting unregulated entities. As this case unfolds, it is vital for traders to remain vigilant and aware of their rights. WikiFX will continue to expose fraudulent practices and advocate for the rights of traders everywhere.
If you have experienced similar issues with PO Trade or any other broker, consider reaching out to WikiFX for assistance. Your voice can help bring attention to these fraudulent practices and protect fellow traders from potential scams.


The Indian rupee settled at 95.15 against the US dollar on 5 August 2026, gaining 13 paise after the Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee voted 6-0 to keep the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 percent for the third time in a row in FY27. The rupee had opened 46 paise higher, rallied to an intraday strongest of 94.89 ahead of the policy decision, and then drifted back as RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra noted that the currency 'has not appreciated as intended despite the high flows from foreign shores.' A weak dollar index, a sharp pullback in Brent crude from above USD 100 in July, and net FII equity inflows of Rs 2,447 crore on Tuesday combined to support the rupee. USD-INR is expected to trade in a 94.80-95.50 band in the near term.

Errante, a Seychelles-based brokerage entity, is facing serious trading allegations from users globally. Users claim to have earned profits legitimately using their strategies. However, on the Errante login dashboard, many users reported an automatic deduction of earned profits. At the same time, withdrawal issues allegedly haunt many traders here. While investigating, we also found complaints concerning trade order manipulations by the broker. In this Errante review, we have examined these allegations and given an overview of its regulatory status.

The Reserve Bank of India has appointed Monisha Chakraborty as Executive Director with effect from 3 August 2026; she will oversee the Foreign Exchange Department and the Financial Markets Regulation Department. Chakraborty is a career central banker with over three decades of experience in Supervision, Foreign Exchange, and Government and Bank Accounts, and previously served as Banking Ombudsman. This report explains the significance of the new RBI Executive Director appointment for forex regulation India, the scope of the Foreign Exchange Department and the Financial Markets Regulation Department, and what authorised persons, banks, and forex market participants should monitor as the new ED takes charge.

A forex liquidity provider decision now shapes the broker's spreads, fills, slippage, hedging cost, regulatory exposure, and exit options long after the platform is chosen. This 2026 guide explains what a forex LP actually delivers versus what the marketing claim says, how tier-1 banks, prime of prime, and multi-LP aggregators differ in practice, and how execution models (DMA, ECN, STP) change the broker's daily operating reality. It also walks through due diligence on credit, technology, reporting, governance, and exit, and shows how a 2026 broker can combine a primary LP with secondary routing without losing control of the client experience. Use the decision matrix, integration timeline, and operational tests to compare an fx liquidity provider before contract signature, not after a market event.