Abstract:In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trade’s unethical practices.

In the competitive world of forex trading, protecting the rights and interests of traders is paramount. Unfortunately, there are brokers who exploit traders' trust, leading to significant financial losses. One such case involves PO Trade, a forex broker that has come under scrutiny for allegedly defrauding its clients. This article highlights the experience of a victim, Abdel, who claims to have lost over $115 million in profits due to PO Trades unethical practices.

The Victim's Account
Abdel, a 23-year-old trader from Yemen, has detailed a troubling experience with PO Trade, also known as Pocket Option. According to Abdel, after successfully trading on the platform, his account was suddenly banned, and his substantial profits were confiscated. He states:
“I traded in PO TRADE LTD/POCKET OPTION correctly and officially, and I have evidence that my transactions are legitimate. My profits exceeded $115 million, but the company blocked my account and stole my earnings, claiming it was due to a technical glitch.”





Abdel alleges that PO Trade manipulated transaction timings in his account statement to justify their actions. He points out discrepancies in the timing of one particular transaction, stating:
“The transaction No. 35272010 shows a time of 11:45:54 on 5/26/2024, but the actual time was 00:45:54 on 5/27/2024. I have documented screenshots of my transactions that prove the legitimacy of my profits.”
Evidence of Fraudulent Practices
Abdel has gathered evidence, including screenshots of his account showing the correct transaction times and amounts. He asserts that he will not rest until he recovers his funds:
“I will continue to demand my rights until I recover all my profits. I have all the documents that prove my case, and I will not give up.”
WikiFX's Role in Protecting Traders
WikiFX is dedicated to safeguarding the legitimate rights of forex traders. This case against PO Trade serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with unregulated brokers. The platform's commitment to transparency and accountability in the forex industry is crucial for protecting traders from fraud.
On WikiFX, this broker has been given a low score of 2.14/10. This is a red flag.

Conclusion
The experience of Abdel with PO Trade is a cautionary tale for all forex traders. It underscores the importance of due diligence when choosing a broker and the potential consequences of trusting unregulated entities. As this case unfolds, it is vital for traders to remain vigilant and aware of their rights. WikiFX will continue to expose fraudulent practices and advocate for the rights of traders everywhere.
If you have experienced similar issues with PO Trade or any other broker, consider reaching out to WikiFX for assistance. Your voice can help bring attention to these fraudulent practices and protect fellow traders from potential scams.


Time is precious, more so in forex trading, where a millisecond delay can either make your winning position turn into a regretful loss or cut short your profit so much that it feels like a loss. While going through numerous user reviews, we often come across the disappointing experiences of slippage draining out their profits due to slow trade order execution. In this article, we have elaborated on low latency, its impact on your trading experience, a host of factors that determine it, etc.

As we examine plexytrade, we come across attractive terms like opening the account with just $50 and enjoying 100% tradable bonus and 120% cash bonus. These terms can prompt anyone to open a plexytrade trading account. But as an informed trader, you need to go beyond these marketing terms. What is the real-time trading experience? Are users receiving the benefits as promised? The plexytrade reviews shared by users online indicate that not everything is good at this broker. Traders have claimed pending withdrawals, high slippage eating into their margins and unwanted account suspensions by the broker. In this article, we have examined user allegations as well as provide our in-depth perspective into the broker’s regulatory status.

The moment the SQUARED FINANCIAL review column opens, a pattern of disturbing complaints appears, demonstrating massive user frustration over alleged withdrawal denials for months, fund disappearance from the platform, frequent login issues and more. These may be user allegations, but the lack of response from the broker side on many such reviews causes some doubt over this Seychelles-based brokerage firm. This article thus aims to provide an insight into the growing user resentment considering the nature of their complaints found until June 2026. Additionally, we will share the broker’s offerings and regulatory framework, allowing you to figure it out better.

Yes, it’s true! The Government of India decided to ban Telegram in the country on June 16, 2026, surprising many who rely on this platform for daily trading alerts & advisories. The ban has taken effect under Section 69A of the IT Act as part of the government’s plan to stop fraud during the NEET-UG re-examination. According to reports, fraudulent rackets were selling fake question papers for amounts ranging from INR 5,000 to 50,000. But the ban, which will be effective until June 22, 2026, affects far more than students. It transcended from a messaging blockout to a sudden disengagement from the app that shaped many traders’ daily routine over time. Out of the 15 crore plus unique registered investors in India, a large chunk sought trading tips, market news, along with buy and sell signals on Telegram. It must have taken investors by surprise. But is the ban detrimental to traders, or is there something more than meets the eye?