Abstract:Evaluating a broker’s safety requires a close look at its regulatory status, trading environment, and user feedback. Strifor is a brokerage firm established in 2022 with its headquarters in Mauritius. While it offers digital account opening and the popular MT5 platform, its low WikiFX score of 1.99 and regulatory status raise significant concerns.

Evaluating a brokers safety requires a close look at its regulatory status, trading environment, and user feedback. Strifor is a brokerage firm established in 2022 with its headquarters in Mauritius. While it offers digital account opening and the popular MT5 platform, its low WikiFX score of 1.99 and regulatory status raise significant concerns.
This review breaks down the safety, fees, and potential risks associated with trading on Strifor.
The most critical factor in choosing a broker is regulation. Our data indicates that Strifor does not hold a valid license from any major financial regulator. While the broker operates out of Mauritius, there is no record of effective regulation by a Tier-1 authority (such as the FCA or ASIC) or even an offshore regulator in the provided data.
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Broker Name | Strifor |
| Establishment Year | 2022 |
| Region | Mauritius |
| Regulatory License | None / Unregulated |
| WikiFX Score | 1.99 / 10 |
| Influence Rank | C |
Risk Warning: The lack of regulation means that client funds may not be protected by compensation schemes. The WikiFX system has assigned Strifor a low score of 1.99, classifying it as a high-risk broker. Dealing with unregulated entities significantly reduces a trader's legal recourse in the event of disputes.
Strifor provides trading services via the MT5 (MetaTrader 5) platform. This is a strong point for the broker, as MT5 is highly customizable and supports automated trading (EAs). However, the software does not support two-step login or biometric authentication, which is a security drawback.
Strifor offers four distinct account types. The leverage offered is high, reaching up to 1:500, which creates both high profit potential and high risk for traders.
| Account Type | Minimum Deposit | Max Leverage | Spreads From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | $0 | 1:500 | 0.1 pips |
| Islamic | $2,000 | 1:500 | 0.1 pips |
| Advanced | $10,000 | 1:500 | 0.0 pips |
| Professional | $20,000 | 1:200 | 0.0 pips |
The entry barrier varies significantly. While the Basic account requires no minimum deposit (“0”), the Islamic and Advanced accounts require substantial capital ($2,000 and $10,000, respectively). The Professional account requires a steep $20,000 deposit and actually caps leverage lower at 1:200 compared to the other accounts.
Analyzing user feedback helps identify operational realities that valid data might miss. Recent exposure reveals a mix of experiences, ranging from successful crypto withdrawals to severe deposit issues.
A significant complaint filed in March 2024 from a user in Pakistan reported that funds deposited into Strifor never reflected in the trading account. Despite sending bank statements and screenshots, the user received no response from support. This type of complaint—missing deposits and unresponsive service—is a serious red flag often associated with unregulated entities.
Conversely, some users have reported positive experiences. A user from India mentioned that while they struggled with other brokers, Strifor processed crypto withdrawals without delay. Another user from Italy highlighted the broker's suitability for scalping on MT5 and confirmed timely payouts via crypto.
Based on the factual data and user case history, here are the primary advantages and disadvantages of this broker.
Pros:
Cons:
Is Strifor safe? Based on the available data, the answer is likely no.
Strifor is an unregulated broker established recently (2022) with a very low safety score. While the provision of the MT5 platform and high leverage might appeal to aggressive traders, the lack of regulatory oversight presents a fundamental risk. The existence of unresolved complaints regarding missing deposits further underscores the danger of trading with a platform that is not accountable to a financial authority.
For the safety of your capital, it is highly recommended to choose brokers that hold valid Tier-1 licenses.
Stay protected in the markets. Before depositing money, always check the broker's regulatory status and latest complaints on the WikiFX App.

When evaluating a forex broker, the safety of funds and regulatory standing are paramount. Exness (specifically the entity operating via premiumexness.com) presents a complex profile for traders to consider. Established fairly recently in 2020 and headquartered in Seychelles, this broker has attracted attention, but not necessarily for the right reasons.

Stockity is an online brokerage firm established in 2022 and registered in the Marshall Islands. While it has established a marketing presence in regions such as Indonesia, South America (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Chile), and parts of Asia (India, Thailand), its regulatory standing raises significant concerns. With a WikiFX score of just 1.42 out of 10, Stockity is categorized as a high-risk entity due to the absence of valid regulatory licenses and multiple unresolved user complaints.

QuoMarkets is a UAE-based brokerage established in 2022, offering completely digital account opening and access to the MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platform. While the broker provides support for multiple account types and cryptocurrency funding, it currently holds a low WikiFX Score of 3.09. This score reflects significant concerns regarding its regulatory status, with licenses marked as "Exceeded" or "Unverified" and explicit warnings from financial authorities.

Titan Capital Markets, established in 2021, presents itself as a financial service provider headquartered in Australia. However, a detailed analysis of its regulatory status and user feedback suggests significant risks. With a dangerously low WikiFX Score of 1.45, this broker has been flagged for regulatory irregularities and a high volume of investor complaints regarding withdrawal failures.