Abstract:FXFP, whose full name is FIDANTE PARTNERS LIMITED, claims to be domiciled in Australia. However, the broker's supervision has lapsed. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission pass-through licence (STP) it holds is suspected to be a duplicate, and its current status is determined to be a suspected clone. Therefore, the broker is not under the supervision of any legal agency, is a complete fund disk fraud, please stay away from the fraud.
FXFP has been included in WikiFX's black platform list, traders are advised to stay away from this scam and beware of the following domain:
https://www.fxfps.com/
FXFP, whose full name is FIDANTE PARTNERS LIMITED, claims to be domiciled in Australia.
However, the broker's supervision has lapsed. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission pass-through licence (STP) it holds is suspected to be a duplicate, and its current status is determined to be a suspected clone.
Therefore, the broker is not under the supervision of any legal agency, is a complete fund disk fraud, please stay away from the fraud.
| Current Status | Suspicious Clone |
| Regulated by | Australia |
| License Type | Straight Through Processing (STP) |
| License No. | 234668 |
| Licensed Institution | FIDANTE PARTNERS LIMITED |

There is very limited disclosure of fraud information about FXFP.But a check of the brokerage's official website, https://www.fxfps.com/, showed that the domain had not yet been registered. So the broker is probably a scam.
Investors should stay away from it completely.


Did you incur trading losses on the Spreadex platform due to wider spreads? Have you experienced delays in trade processing by the United Kingdom-based forex broker? Has your Spreadex trading account been closed without any explanation? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns on online broker review platforms. In this Spreadex review 2026, we have covered user allegations and provided a regulatory framework the broker operates under.

A broker can launch a white-label platform quickly and still fail the first serious operating test. The failure often begins quietly: an assets expansion has been approved, the client app is branded, and a new account journey looks complete. Then a client asks why a trade-related status, funding hand-off, or account restriction looks different across channels. Support cannot see the same reference trail as operations. The product owns the screen, but no one owns the explanation. The issue is not a missing feature. It is an untested operating model. That is why a cTrader white label platform should be evaluated as a route to a multi-asset service - not as a shortcut to a more attractive terminal. The central question is whether the broker can add instruments, client channels, integrations, and service capacity without making its controls harder to operate or explain.

This Trading Pro broker review checks the FCA warning, Indonesia blocklist evidence, licence claims, and what South Asian users should verify before depositing.

The decision to switch white label providers or migrate to a modern white label trading platform is no longer a luxury for growth-minded brokers—it's a strategic necessity for survival in 2026. The convergence of technological stagnation, regulatory evolution, and shifting client expectations has created a perfect storm.