Moss Global Review 2026: Is This Forex Broker Safe?

Moss Global is a forex broker established in 2016 with a WikiFX Score of 7.60. According to the provided WikiFX data, it has multiple regulatory records across Malta, Australia, the United Kingdom, Cyprus, the UAE, and Belarus. However, the brokers regulatory profile is mixed: several licenses are marked as “regulated,” while others are listed as “revoked” or “unverified.” This means Moss Global should not be assessed only by its headline score; traders should examine each license carefully before opening or funding an account.

Pros and Cons of Moss Global

• ✅ WikiFX Score is 7.60, which is relatively strong based on the provided profile.
• ✅ The broker has been established since 2016.
• ✅ Multiple regulatory entries are shown as currently regulated.
• ✅ Customer service supports multiple languages according to the broker profile.
• ❌ Regulatory status is questionable because some records are marked as revoked or unverified.
• ❌ The profile notes multiple exposure records.
• ❌ Customer responses may be received, but the waiting time can be long.
• ❌ No trading condition details such as spreads, leverage, account types, or platform specifications are provided in the data.

Moss Global Regulation and License Safety

Moss Global has a complex regulatory profile. Several licenses are shown as active, but the presence of revoked and unverified records reduces overall clarity. For traders, this means the key safety question is not simply whether the broker has licenses, but whether the specific entity, license number, and regulatory status match the account being offered.

Malta MFSA License

The Malta Financial Services Authority record is listed under Test Inc. with license number C112331. Its status is marked as regulated. A regulated status can be a positive factor because it indicates that the broker entity is listed under an active supervisory framework in the provided WikiFX data.

Australia ASIC Licenses

Moss Global has multiple Australia ASIC-related records. One ASIC entry under Moss Global is marked as regulated with license number 652091 . Another ASIC entry under Moss Global is marked as unverified with license number 656221 . A separate ASIC record under is also marked as regulated with license number 0012478.

This mixed ASIC profile requires careful review. A regulated record may support credibility, but an unverified record can create uncertainty about whether a particular license is valid, applicable, or connected to the account being promoted.

United Kingdom FCA Record

The United Kingdom FCA record under Moss Global is marked as revoked with license number 240409. A revoked status is a significant warning sign because it indicates that the license is no longer active in the provided regulatory data. Traders should not treat a revoked record as current authorization.

Cyprus CYSEC License

The Cyprus CYSEC record under is marked as regulated with license number 776522. This is a positive regulatory entry in the profile, but traders should still confirm whether this entity is directly connected to the account and services they intend to use.

UAE CMA License

The UAE CMA record under Test Company is marked as regulated with the license number listed as Test. This adds another active regulatory entry to the profile, although the different organization name means entity matching remains important.

Belarus NBRB License

The Belarus NBRB record under is marked as regulated with license number 156958. As with the other entries, the status is positive, but the organization name should be checked carefully against the trading entity.

Risk Warning

The main concern is not the absence of regulation, but inconsistency within the regulatory profile. Moss Global includes active, revoked, and unverified records at the same time. Traders should confirm which legal entity they are dealing with and avoid relying on outdated or unrelated license claims.

Real User Feedback and Complaints

User feedback for Moss Global is mixed. The most serious report describes an investor who claimed to have invested 57k and accumulated profits but was unable to withdraw funds. The user suspected the issue was malicious. Withdrawal-related complaints are particularly important because they directly affect fund safety and trust.

Other feedback is more positive or neutral. One review described the platform as user-friendly, with diverse trading instruments, efficient transactions, responsive support, and useful educational resources.

Additional user comments were brief and generally favorable, suggesting the broker looked acceptable or was worth paying attention to. However, these comments provide limited detail and should not outweigh the more serious withdrawal-related exposure.

One unrelated-sounding review discussed product quality, rice, delivery, and politeness rather than trading performance. Because it does not clearly describe forex trading conditions or account experience, it should be treated with caution when evaluating the broker.

Final Verdict

Moss Global presents a stronger-than-average WikiFX Score of 7.60 and several regulated license records, but its safety profile is not straightforward. The existence of revoked and unverified regulatory entries, together with a serious withdrawal complaint, means traders should conduct careful due diligence before depositing funds.

Before using the Moss Global login, verify that you are accessing the official broker domain and that the account entity matches a valid, currently regulated license.

To stay safe and view the latest regulatory certificates, check Moss Global on the WikiFX App.